Racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2024.2417392
Rachel McPherson, Barbara Resnick, Elizabeth Galik, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Sarah Holmes, Nancy Kusmaul
{"title":"Racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.","authors":"Rachel McPherson, Barbara Resnick, Elizabeth Galik, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Sarah Holmes, Nancy Kusmaul","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2024.2417392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The resident population in nursing homes is increasingly racially diverse. The purpose of this study was to assess racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study utilized baseline data from the Testing the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD), a randomized controlled pragmatic trial. The Quality of Interaction Scale (QuIS) was used to measure quality of staff-resident care interactions. The sample included 531 residents. An analysis of covariance was conducted to address the aim.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of interactions were positive social (42%) or positive care (37%). Black residents living with dementia had higher QuIS scores (<i>M </i>= 5.98, <i>SD </i>= 1.66) than White residents with dementia (<i>M </i>= 5.40, <i>SD </i>= 1.75), whereas higher QuIS scores indicating more positive interactions. However, the results of the analysis of covariance indicated that there was not a significant difference in QuIS scores between Black versus White residents living with dementia (<i>p </i>=.203).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that care interactions in nursing homes are consistent between Black residents and White residents. Future research should evaluate the impact of staff race on the quality of care interaction among nursing home residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2417392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The resident population in nursing homes is increasingly racially diverse. The purpose of this study was to assess racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.

Design: The study utilized baseline data from the Testing the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD), a randomized controlled pragmatic trial. The Quality of Interaction Scale (QuIS) was used to measure quality of staff-resident care interactions. The sample included 531 residents. An analysis of covariance was conducted to address the aim.

Results: The majority of interactions were positive social (42%) or positive care (37%). Black residents living with dementia had higher QuIS scores (M = 5.98, SD = 1.66) than White residents with dementia (M = 5.40, SD = 1.75), whereas higher QuIS scores indicating more positive interactions. However, the results of the analysis of covariance indicated that there was not a significant difference in QuIS scores between Black versus White residents living with dementia (p =.203).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that care interactions in nursing homes are consistent between Black residents and White residents. Future research should evaluate the impact of staff race on the quality of care interaction among nursing home residents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养老院痴呆症患者在护理互动质量方面的种族差异。
目的:养老院中的居民越来越具有种族多样性。本研究旨在评估患有痴呆症的养老院居民在护理互动质量方面的种族差异:本研究利用了 "痴呆症行为和心理症状证据整合三角测试"(EIT-4-BPSD)的基线数据,这是一项随机对照实用试验。互动质量量表(QuIS)用于测量工作人员与住院患者之间的护理互动质量。样本包括 531 名住院患者。为达到目的,进行了协方差分析:大多数互动是积极的社交(42%)或积极的护理(37%)。与患有痴呆症的白人居民相比,患有痴呆症的黑人居民的QuIS得分更高(中位数=5.98,标定数=1.66),而QuIS得分越高,表示积极的互动越多。然而,协方差分析的结果表明,患有痴呆症的黑人与白人居民之间的QuIS得分差异并不显著(P =.203):研究结果表明,养老院中黑人居民与白人居民之间的护理互动是一致的。未来的研究应评估员工种族对养老院居民护理互动质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
期刊最新文献
'COVID impacted my life in so many ways': a qualitative study of the lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among people of Black ethnicities living with HIV in England. A paradox of white privilege: race, psychological resilience, and mental well-being during a public health crisis. 'I didn't expect to be so close to being diabetic': beliefs of prediabetes and diabetes prevention among Hispanic men at a federally qualified health center. Psychological distress in Asian American informal caregivers: an analysis by disaggregated ethnic groups. Racial diversity, interracial trust, and mental distress in post-apartheid South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1