{"title":"\"I'll Be That One Cockblocking Friend\": Understanding Student Experiences of Bystander Intervention in Alcohol-Related Sexual Assault.","authors":"Jasmine Temple, Gabrielle Haley, Anna Yoder, Annelise Mennicke, Jessamyn Moxie, Erin Meehan, Erika Montanaro","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2417026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of sexual assault (SA) among college students (13%) is unacceptable, underreported, and alcohol use by the perpetrator or victim is reported in 50% of SA cases. Bystander intervention (BI) programs, which use prosocial behaviors to prevent or stop a harmful situation from occurring, have been implemented across college campuses to reduce SA. There are several known barriers (e.g. self-intoxication) and facilitators (e.g. peer support) to BI for SA; however, less is known about barriers and facilitators to BI for alcohol-related SA. Alcohol-<i>related</i> SA includes situations in which the perpetrator and/or victim are intoxicated, whereas alcohol-<i>facilitated</i> SA includes situations in which individuals intentionally use alcohol as a perpetration strategy. The current study examined student perspectives of BI for SA opportunities, actions taken in response to opportunities, and barriers and facilitators to action. The team conducted content and deductive thematic analysis of data from focus groups and interviews with diverse undergraduate students (<i>N</i> = 79). Opportunities included perpetrator-focused, victim-focused, and sexual risk opportunities. Actions taken included staying vigilant, monitoring friends, communicating with friends, and removing friends. Barriers included self-intoxication, feeling helpless, peer pressure, not feeling personally responsible, and fearing the consequences of helping. Finally, facilitators included knowing friends' concerning signals and drinking motives, feeling like some intervention strategies are easy, understanding sex-related risks, acknowledging consent and personal boundaries, and feeling personally responsible for friends. Understanding these situations' nuances can help to inform more effective and comprehensive BI programs to reduce SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2417026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prevalence of sexual assault (SA) among college students (13%) is unacceptable, underreported, and alcohol use by the perpetrator or victim is reported in 50% of SA cases. Bystander intervention (BI) programs, which use prosocial behaviors to prevent or stop a harmful situation from occurring, have been implemented across college campuses to reduce SA. There are several known barriers (e.g. self-intoxication) and facilitators (e.g. peer support) to BI for SA; however, less is known about barriers and facilitators to BI for alcohol-related SA. Alcohol-related SA includes situations in which the perpetrator and/or victim are intoxicated, whereas alcohol-facilitated SA includes situations in which individuals intentionally use alcohol as a perpetration strategy. The current study examined student perspectives of BI for SA opportunities, actions taken in response to opportunities, and barriers and facilitators to action. The team conducted content and deductive thematic analysis of data from focus groups and interviews with diverse undergraduate students (N = 79). Opportunities included perpetrator-focused, victim-focused, and sexual risk opportunities. Actions taken included staying vigilant, monitoring friends, communicating with friends, and removing friends. Barriers included self-intoxication, feeling helpless, peer pressure, not feeling personally responsible, and fearing the consequences of helping. Finally, facilitators included knowing friends' concerning signals and drinking motives, feeling like some intervention strategies are easy, understanding sex-related risks, acknowledging consent and personal boundaries, and feeling personally responsible for friends. Understanding these situations' nuances can help to inform more effective and comprehensive BI programs to reduce SA.
大学生中的性侵犯(SA)发生率(13%)令人难以接受,而且报告不足,在 50%的性侵犯案件中,施暴者或受害者都曾酗酒。旁观者干预(BI)计划利用亲社会行为来预防或阻止有害情况的发生,已在大学校园中实施,以减少性侵犯。对 SA 进行旁观者干预有几种已知的障碍(如自我中毒)和促进因素(如同伴支持);但对与酒精相关的 SA 进行旁观者干预的障碍和促进因素却知之甚少。与酒精相关的 SA 包括施暴者和/或受害者喝醉的情况,而酒精促成的 SA 包括个人故意使用酒精作为施暴策略的情况。当前的研究考察了学生从 BI 角度看 SA 的机会、针对机会采取的行动以及行动的障碍和促进因素。研究小组对来自焦点小组和访谈的数据进行了内容和演绎主题分析,访谈对象为不同的本科生(79 人)。机会包括犯罪者机会、受害者机会和性风险机会。所采取的行动包括保持警惕、监督朋友、与朋友沟通以及移除朋友。障碍包括自我陶醉、无助感、同伴压力、不觉得自己有责任以及害怕帮助的后果。最后,促进因素包括了解朋友的相关信号和饮酒动机、感觉某些干预策略很简单、了解与性有关的风险、承认同意和个人界限,以及感觉自己要对朋友负责。了解这些情况的细微差别有助于制定更有效、更全面的 BI 计划,以减少 SA。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.