Are the self-stigma and perceived stigma of patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine still a problem fifty years after the marketing authorization for opioid agonist treatment? The observational STIGMA study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00506-1
Mélanie Pinhal, Benoit Schreck, Juliette Leboucher, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau, Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Marie Grall-Bronnec
{"title":"Are the self-stigma and perceived stigma of patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine still a problem fifty years after the marketing authorization for opioid agonist treatment? The observational STIGMA study.","authors":"Mélanie Pinhal, Benoit Schreck, Juliette Leboucher, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau, Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Marie Grall-Bronnec","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00506-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of the opioid overdose crisis, understanding the barriers to seeking, attaining and remaining in treatment for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) is a public health issue. To date, very few studies have assessed the \"self-stigma\" (i.e., the internalization of negative societal attitudes and stereotypes about oneself, leading to self-judgment) and \"perceived stigma\" (i.e., the belief that others hold negative attitudes towards oneself due to a particular condition) experienced by patients with OUD receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and none have done so in France. Our study aimed to quantify self-stigma, explore some aspects of perceived stigma, determine the factors associated with greater self-stigma and examine whether the level of self-stigma was related to a delay in seeking care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The STIGMA study was a monocentric, cross-sectional study. The data were collected in a French hospital addiction medicine department. Participants were outpatients with current or past OUD who were still receiving or had received OAT. A questionnaire assessing sociodemographics; OUD characteristics; perceived stigma; and quantification of self-stigma by the Self-Stigma Scale-Short, was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Nearly two-thirds of the patients had a \"moderate to high\" level of self-stigma. These patients were significantly younger at OUD onset and were significantly more likely to have at least one dependent child than patients reporting a \"very low to low\" level of self-stigma. Nearly half of the participants experienced perceived stigma from a healthcare professional regarding their OUD or OAT, and nearly one-third of the participants were refused care from a healthcare professional because of their OUD or OAT. Moreover, a quarter of the sample reported delaying care due to fear of being stigmatized. We did not find a relationship between self-stigma levels and a delay in seeking care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the need to detect stigma and to improve training in addiction medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00506-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of the opioid overdose crisis, understanding the barriers to seeking, attaining and remaining in treatment for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) is a public health issue. To date, very few studies have assessed the "self-stigma" (i.e., the internalization of negative societal attitudes and stereotypes about oneself, leading to self-judgment) and "perceived stigma" (i.e., the belief that others hold negative attitudes towards oneself due to a particular condition) experienced by patients with OUD receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and none have done so in France. Our study aimed to quantify self-stigma, explore some aspects of perceived stigma, determine the factors associated with greater self-stigma and examine whether the level of self-stigma was related to a delay in seeking care.

Methods: The STIGMA study was a monocentric, cross-sectional study. The data were collected in a French hospital addiction medicine department. Participants were outpatients with current or past OUD who were still receiving or had received OAT. A questionnaire assessing sociodemographics; OUD characteristics; perceived stigma; and quantification of self-stigma by the Self-Stigma Scale-Short, was administered.

Results: A total of 73 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Nearly two-thirds of the patients had a "moderate to high" level of self-stigma. These patients were significantly younger at OUD onset and were significantly more likely to have at least one dependent child than patients reporting a "very low to low" level of self-stigma. Nearly half of the participants experienced perceived stigma from a healthcare professional regarding their OUD or OAT, and nearly one-third of the participants were refused care from a healthcare professional because of their OUD or OAT. Moreover, a quarter of the sample reported delaying care due to fear of being stigmatized. We did not find a relationship between self-stigma levels and a delay in seeking care.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the need to detect stigma and to improve training in addiction medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿片类激动剂治疗获得市场授权五十年后,接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的患者的自我污名和感知到的污名是否仍是一个问题?STIGMA 观察性研究。
背景:在阿片类药物过量危机的背景下,了解阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者寻求、获得和坚持治疗的障碍是一个公共卫生问题。迄今为止,很少有研究对接受阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的阿片类药物使用障碍患者所经历的 "自我污名"(即对自己的负面社会态度和刻板印象的内在化,从而导致自我评判)和 "感知污名"(即认为他人因特定病症而对自己持有负面态度)进行评估,在法国也没有此类研究。我们的研究旨在量化自我污名,探索感知到的污名的某些方面,确定与更大程度的自我污名相关的因素,并研究自我污名的程度是否与延迟就医有关:STIGMA 研究是一项单中心横断面研究。数据在法国一家医院的成瘾医学科收集。研究对象为正在接受或已经接受 OAT 治疗的当前或过去患有 OUD 的门诊患者。研究人员发放了一份调查问卷,评估社会人口统计学特征、OUD特征、感知到的耻辱感,并通过自我耻辱感量表--简表对自我耻辱感进行量化:共有 73 份问卷被纳入分析。近三分之二的患者有 "中度至高度 "的自我耻辱感。与自我鄙视程度 "极低至低 "的患者相比,这些患者在出现 OUD 时明显更年轻,而且至少有一个受抚养子女的可能性也明显更高。近一半的参与者认为自己的 OUD 或 OAT 遭到了医疗专业人员的羞辱,近三分之一的参与者因为 OUD 或 OAT 而被医疗专业人员拒绝治疗。此外,四分之一的样本报告称,由于害怕被污名化而延误了治疗。我们没有发现自我污名化程度与延迟就医之间存在关系:我们的研究强调了发现污名化和改善成瘾医学培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Addiction consult service involvement in PrEP and PEP delivery for patients who inject drugs admitted to an urban essential hospital. Expanding access to addictions care: Implementation of a 24-hour healthcare provider support line in British Columbia, Canada. The effects of neighborhood perceptions on response to a technology-assisted parenting intervention for adolescent substance use: protocol of a diversity supplement to parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment). Are the self-stigma and perceived stigma of patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine still a problem fifty years after the marketing authorization for opioid agonist treatment? The observational STIGMA study. Acceptability of "DIDE", a mobile application designed at facilitating care adherence of patients with substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1