Stand-alone transarterial flow diversion for treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas

Arevik Abramyan MD, PhD , Gaurav Gupta MD , Sanjeev Sreenivasan MCh , Jonathan Lowenthal MD , Mena Samaan BA , Priyank Khandelwal MD , Srihari Sundararajan MD , Hai Sun MD , Emad Nourollah-Zadeh MD , Sudipta Roychowdhury MD
{"title":"Stand-alone transarterial flow diversion for treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas","authors":"Arevik Abramyan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gaurav Gupta MD ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Sreenivasan MCh ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lowenthal MD ,&nbsp;Mena Samaan BA ,&nbsp;Priyank Khandelwal MD ,&nbsp;Srihari Sundararajan MD ,&nbsp;Hai Sun MD ,&nbsp;Emad Nourollah-Zadeh MD ,&nbsp;Sudipta Roychowdhury MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare arteriovenous communications allowing blood to flow from the carotid artery into the cavernous sinus. Although currently coil and/or liquid embolization remain the preferred treatment methods for CCFs, flow diverters (FD) stents represent a viable alternative to traditional embolization techniques. This study explores both the technical aspects and rationale behind using FD stents as a stand-alone treatment approach for CCFs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study includes records of 7 patients with CCFs treated at two comprehensive stroke centers from 2019 to 2023. Patients treated with FD stenting in conjunction with coil and/or liquid embolization were excluded from the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five patients were diagnosed with direct CCFs and 2 patients with indirect CCFs. Six patients were treated with the Surpass Evolve FD stent and 1 patient with the Pipeline FD stent. DSA follow-up was performed for an average duration of 14.4 months following FD placement. Complete fistula obliteration with no residual shunting was observed in all patients. Furthermore, all patients experienced a complete resolution of symptoms following treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The authors’ experiences suggest the efficacy and safety of FD stenting as a stand-alone treatment option for CCFs. Compared to embolization, FD stents can better preserve the parent vessel and promote healing with less associated mass effect. Despite being a retrospective self-assessment with a relatively small sample size, to the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the largest individual case series of patients with CCF treated with stand-alone FD stenting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724004919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare arteriovenous communications allowing blood to flow from the carotid artery into the cavernous sinus. Although currently coil and/or liquid embolization remain the preferred treatment methods for CCFs, flow diverters (FD) stents represent a viable alternative to traditional embolization techniques. This study explores both the technical aspects and rationale behind using FD stents as a stand-alone treatment approach for CCFs.

Methods

The study includes records of 7 patients with CCFs treated at two comprehensive stroke centers from 2019 to 2023. Patients treated with FD stenting in conjunction with coil and/or liquid embolization were excluded from the study.

Results

Five patients were diagnosed with direct CCFs and 2 patients with indirect CCFs. Six patients were treated with the Surpass Evolve FD stent and 1 patient with the Pipeline FD stent. DSA follow-up was performed for an average duration of 14.4 months following FD placement. Complete fistula obliteration with no residual shunting was observed in all patients. Furthermore, all patients experienced a complete resolution of symptoms following treatment.

Conclusions

The authors’ experiences suggest the efficacy and safety of FD stenting as a stand-alone treatment option for CCFs. Compared to embolization, FD stents can better preserve the parent vessel and promote healing with less associated mass effect. Despite being a retrospective self-assessment with a relatively small sample size, to the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the largest individual case series of patients with CCF treated with stand-alone FD stenting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗颈动脉海绵状瘘的独立经动脉导流术
目的:颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是一种罕见的动静脉沟通疾病,可使血液从颈动脉流入海绵窦。尽管目前线圈和/或液体栓塞仍是治疗 CCF 的首选方法,但血流分流(FD)支架是传统栓塞技术的可行替代方案。本研究探讨了将 FD 支架作为单独治疗 CCFs 方法的技术方面和原理:研究包括 2019 年至 2023 年期间在两家综合卒中中心治疗的 7 名 CCFs 患者的记录。研究排除了使用 FD 支架与线圈和/或液体栓塞联合治疗的患者:5名患者被诊断为直接CCF,2名患者被诊断为间接CCF。六名患者接受了 Surpass Evolve FD 支架治疗,一名患者接受了 Pipeline FD 支架治疗。放置 FD 后,进行了平均 14.4 个月的 DSA 随访。所有患者的瘘管均完全闭塞,没有残余分流。此外,所有患者在治疗后症状均完全消失:作者的经验表明,FD 支架植入术作为一种独立的 CCF 治疗方案,具有良好的疗效和安全性。与栓塞治疗相比,FD 支架能更好地保护母血管并促进愈合,同时减少相关的肿块效应。尽管这是一项样本量相对较小的回顾性自我评估,但据作者所知,这项研究代表了单独使用 FD 支架治疗 CCF 患者的最大个体病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Spontaneous Neuronal Plasticity in the Contralateral Motor Cortex and Corticospinal Tract after Focal Cortical Infarction in Hypertensive Rats" [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2020 Dec;29(12):105235/Manuscript NO:JSCVD-D-20-00162]. CONTEXTUAL AND CLINICAL FACTORS AS EXPLAINERS OF STROKE SEVERITY, RESIDUAL MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS, AND FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE DURING HOSPITALIZATION. CTP-Derived Venous Outflow Profiles Correlate With Tissue-Level Collaterals Regardless of Arterial Collateral Status. Relationship between hyoid-carotid distance, hyoid position and morphology and degree of stenosis and associated stroke. Stroke education: Engaging learners and the community to advance care for cerebrovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1