Age differences in the change in cognition after stroke

Mellanie V. Springer MD, MS , Bingxin Chen MA , Rachael T. Whitney PhD , Emily M. Briceño PhD , Alden L. Gross PhD , Hugo J. Aparicio MD, MPH , Alexa S. Beiser PhD , James F. Burke MD, MS , Bruno Giordani PhD , Rebecca F. Gottesman MD, PhD , Rodney A. Hayward MD , Virginia J. Howard PhD , Silvia Koton PhD, RN , Ronald M. Lazar PhD , Jeremy B. Sussman MD, MS , Wen Ye PhD , Deborah A. Levine MD, MPH
{"title":"Age differences in the change in cognition after stroke","authors":"Mellanie V. Springer MD, MS ,&nbsp;Bingxin Chen MA ,&nbsp;Rachael T. Whitney PhD ,&nbsp;Emily M. Briceño PhD ,&nbsp;Alden L. Gross PhD ,&nbsp;Hugo J. Aparicio MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Alexa S. Beiser PhD ,&nbsp;James F. Burke MD, MS ,&nbsp;Bruno Giordani PhD ,&nbsp;Rebecca F. Gottesman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rodney A. Hayward MD ,&nbsp;Virginia J. Howard PhD ,&nbsp;Silvia Koton PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Ronald M. Lazar PhD ,&nbsp;Jeremy B. Sussman MD, MS ,&nbsp;Wen Ye PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah A. Levine MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare changes in cognitive trajectories after stroke between younger (18-64) and older (65+) adults, accounting for pre-stroke cognitive trajectories.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Pooled cohort study using individual participant data from 3 US cohorts (1971-2019), the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study (ARIC), Framingham Offspring Study (FOS), and REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke Study (REGARDS). Linear mixed effect models evaluated the association between age and the initial change (intercept) and rate of change (slope) in cognition after compared to before stroke. Outcomes were global cognition (primary), memory and executive function.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 1,292 participants with stroke; 197 younger (47.2 % female, 32.5 % Black race) and 1,095 older (50.2 % female, 46.4 % Black race). Median (IQR) age at stroke was 59.7 (56.6-61.7) (younger group) and 75.2 (70.5-80.2) years (older group). Compared to the young, older participants had greater declines in global cognition (-1.69 point [95 % CI, -2.82 to -0.55] greater), memory (-1.05 point [95 % CI, -1.92 to -0.17] greater), and executive function (-3.72 point [95 % CI, -5.23 to -2.21] greater) initially after stroke. Older age was associated with faster declines in global cognition (-0.18 points per year [95 % CI, -0.36 to -0.01] faster) and executive function (-0.16 [95 % CI, -0.26 to -0.06] points per year for every 10 years of higher age), but not memory (-0.006 [95 % CI, -0.15 to 0.14]), after compared to before stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Older age was associated with greater post-stroke cognitive declines, accounting for differences in pre-stroke cognitive trajectories between the old and the young.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724005317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare changes in cognitive trajectories after stroke between younger (18-64) and older (65+) adults, accounting for pre-stroke cognitive trajectories.

Materials and methods

Pooled cohort study using individual participant data from 3 US cohorts (1971-2019), the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study (ARIC), Framingham Offspring Study (FOS), and REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke Study (REGARDS). Linear mixed effect models evaluated the association between age and the initial change (intercept) and rate of change (slope) in cognition after compared to before stroke. Outcomes were global cognition (primary), memory and executive function.

Results

We included 1,292 participants with stroke; 197 younger (47.2 % female, 32.5 % Black race) and 1,095 older (50.2 % female, 46.4 % Black race). Median (IQR) age at stroke was 59.7 (56.6-61.7) (younger group) and 75.2 (70.5-80.2) years (older group). Compared to the young, older participants had greater declines in global cognition (-1.69 point [95 % CI, -2.82 to -0.55] greater), memory (-1.05 point [95 % CI, -1.92 to -0.17] greater), and executive function (-3.72 point [95 % CI, -5.23 to -2.21] greater) initially after stroke. Older age was associated with faster declines in global cognition (-0.18 points per year [95 % CI, -0.36 to -0.01] faster) and executive function (-0.16 [95 % CI, -0.26 to -0.06] points per year for every 10 years of higher age), but not memory (-0.006 [95 % CI, -0.15 to 0.14]), after compared to before stroke.

Conclusion

Older age was associated with greater post-stroke cognitive declines, accounting for differences in pre-stroke cognitive trajectories between the old and the young.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后认知变化的年龄差异。
目的:比较年轻人(18-64 岁)和老年人(65 岁以上)中风后认知轨迹的变化:比较年轻人(18-64 岁)和老年人(65 岁以上)中风后认知轨迹的变化,同时考虑中风前的认知轨迹:使用 3 个美国队列(1971-2019 年)的个人参与者数据进行汇总队列研究,这 3 个美国队列分别是社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)、弗雷明汉后代研究(FOS)和中风的地域和种族差异原因研究(REGARDS)。线性混合效应模型评估了年龄与认知能力的初始变化(截距)和变化率(斜率)之间的关系。结果包括总体认知(主要)、记忆和执行功能:我们纳入了 1,292 名中风患者,其中年轻患者 197 人(女性占 47.2%,黑人占 32.5%),年长者 1,095 人(女性占 50.2%,黑人占 46.4%)。中风时的中位(IQR)年龄为 59.7(56.6-61.7)岁(年轻组)和 75.2(70.5-80.2)岁(老年组)。与年轻人相比,老年参与者在中风后初期的整体认知(-1.69 分 [95 % CI, -2.82 to -0.55])、记忆(-1.05 分 [95 % CI, -1.92 to -0.17])和执行功能(-3.72 分 [95 % CI, -5.23 to -2.21])下降幅度更大。与脑卒中前相比,年龄越大,脑卒中后总体认知(每年下降 0.18 分 [95 % CI, -0.36 到 -0.01])和执行功能(年龄每增加 10 岁,每年下降 0.16 分 [95 % CI, -0.26 到 -0.06])下降越快,但记忆力(-0.006 [95 % CI, -0.15 到 0.14])下降不明显:结论:年龄越大,脑卒中后认知能力下降的幅度越大,这与老年人和年轻人脑卒中前认知轨迹的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Utilization and Impact of Hospital Procedural Volume on Mortality after Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Corrigendum to "Spontaneous Neuronal Plasticity in the Contralateral Motor Cortex and Corticospinal Tract after Focal Cortical Infarction in Hypertensive Rats" [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2020 Dec;29(12):105235/Manuscript NO:JSCVD-D-20-00162]. Incidence and Characterization of Late Onset Movement Disorders Following Thrombolysis or Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Stroke education: Engaging learners and the community to advance care for cerebrovascular disease Contextual and clinical factors as explainers of stroke severity, residual motor impairments, and functional independence during hospitalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1