The development of a tool for GPs to manage overweight and obesity in children: A Delphi study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2413877
Maxime Adriana Maria van der Velden, Madelon van Tilborg-den Boeft, Sylvia Buis, Wilma Jansen, Patrick Jan Eugène Bindels, Marienke van Middelkoop
{"title":"The development of a tool for GPs to manage overweight and obesity in children: A Delphi study.","authors":"Maxime Adriana Maria van der Velden, Madelon van Tilborg-den Boeft, Sylvia Buis, Wilma Jansen, Patrick Jan Eugène Bindels, Marienke van Middelkoop","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2413877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) could play an important role in the management of overweight and obesity in children. However, GPs experience different barriers and are in need of supportive tools. In order to support GPs to identify, address and refer these children, new tools should be developed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish consensus among GPs about the content topics of a supportive tool to identify, address and refer children with overweight and obesity in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi study was conducted with GPs identified as experts. A concept of a supportive tool was constructed based on focus-group interviews with GPs, practice nurses and parents of children with and without overweight and literature. The tool was categorised into five topics: identifying, initiating and continuing weight-related conversations, referring and evaluating a tool manual. GPs evaluated statements on the tool's topics in terms of importance. All statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and consensus was set at ≥70% of respondents agreeing with the statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs agreed that a supportive tool must contain a child's specialised BMI calculator; examples to initiate and to continue weight-related conversations with parents and children; a map with available interventions; and a manual including information and resources about health risks of overweight and obesity during childhood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The content topics of a supportive tool for GPs to identify, discuss and refer children with overweight and obesity were determined through a consensus-driven process. Further validation and assessment are required through a feasibility and implementation study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2413877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) could play an important role in the management of overweight and obesity in children. However, GPs experience different barriers and are in need of supportive tools. In order to support GPs to identify, address and refer these children, new tools should be developed.

Objective: To establish consensus among GPs about the content topics of a supportive tool to identify, address and refer children with overweight and obesity in general practice.

Methods: A two-round Delphi study was conducted with GPs identified as experts. A concept of a supportive tool was constructed based on focus-group interviews with GPs, practice nurses and parents of children with and without overweight and literature. The tool was categorised into five topics: identifying, initiating and continuing weight-related conversations, referring and evaluating a tool manual. GPs evaluated statements on the tool's topics in terms of importance. All statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and consensus was set at ≥70% of respondents agreeing with the statements.

Results: GPs agreed that a supportive tool must contain a child's specialised BMI calculator; examples to initiate and to continue weight-related conversations with parents and children; a map with available interventions; and a manual including information and resources about health risks of overweight and obesity during childhood.

Conclusion: The content topics of a supportive tool for GPs to identify, discuss and refer children with overweight and obesity were determined through a consensus-driven process. Further validation and assessment are required through a feasibility and implementation study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为全科医生开发管理儿童超重和肥胖症的工具:德尔菲研究。
背景:全科医生(GPs)在管理儿童超重和肥胖方面可以发挥重要作用。然而,全科医生会遇到不同的障碍,需要辅助工具。为了支持全科医生识别、处理和转诊这些儿童,应开发新的工具:目的:在全科医生中就全科医生识别、处理和转诊超重和肥胖儿童的辅助工具的内容主题达成共识:方法:与被确定为专家的全科医生进行了两轮德尔菲研究。根据与全科医生、执业护士以及超重和未超重儿童的家长进行的焦点小组访谈,构建了支持性工具的概念。该工具分为五个主题:识别、启动和继续与体重有关的对话、转诊和评估工具手册。全科医生根据工具主题的重要性对陈述进行评估。所有陈述均采用 5 点李克特量表评分,同意陈述的受访者比例≥70% 即为达成共识:结果:全科医生一致认为,支持性工具必须包含儿童专用的体重指数计算器;与家长和儿童开展并继续进行体重相关对话的范例;可采取干预措施的地图;以及包括有关儿童期超重和肥胖的健康风险的信息和资源的手册:全科医生识别、讨论和转诊超重和肥胖儿童的辅助工具的内容主题是通过共识驱动过程确定的。需要通过可行性和实施研究进一步验证和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
期刊最新文献
Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view. Diagnostic flow for all patients referred with non-specific symptoms of cancer to a diagnostic centre in Denmark: A descriptive study. Monitoring COVID-19 in Belgian general practice: A tool for syndromic surveillance based on electronic health records. Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire. The experiences of transgender and nonbinary adults in primary care: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1