ALTERATION OF TREATMENT CHOICES AND THE VISUAL PROGNOSIS FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN THE ERA OF ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR DRUGS: Analysis of the STREAT-DME 2 Study.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004301
Masahiko Shimura, Takao Hirano, Eiko Tsuiki, Yoshihiro Takamura, Yuki Morizane, Kunihiko Akiyama, Kaori Yamamoto, Taiichi Hikichi, Takashi Koto, Takamasa Kinoshita, Sentaro Kusuhara, Shigeo Yoshida, Shin-Ichi Sakamoto, Kazuhiro Kimura, Masahiko Sugimoto, Teruyo Kida, Yoshinori Mitamura, Yoko Takatsuna, Noriaki Washio, Rie Osaka, Tetsuki Ueda, Akira Minamoto, Jiro Kogo, Fumiki Okamoto, Hiroshi Enaida, Yoshihito Sakanishi, Taiji Nagaoka, Fumi Gomi, Mariko Sasaki, Hiroto Terasaki, Takeshi Iwase, Tomoaki Tatsumi, Kosuke Nishi, Kei Shinoda, Shunichiro Ueda, Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo, Hiroyuki Nakashizuka, Toshinori Murata, Shigehiko Kitano, Taiji Sakamoto
{"title":"ALTERATION OF TREATMENT CHOICES AND THE VISUAL PROGNOSIS FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN THE ERA OF ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR DRUGS: Analysis of the STREAT-DME 2 Study.","authors":"Masahiko Shimura, Takao Hirano, Eiko Tsuiki, Yoshihiro Takamura, Yuki Morizane, Kunihiko Akiyama, Kaori Yamamoto, Taiichi Hikichi, Takashi Koto, Takamasa Kinoshita, Sentaro Kusuhara, Shigeo Yoshida, Shin-Ichi Sakamoto, Kazuhiro Kimura, Masahiko Sugimoto, Teruyo Kida, Yoshinori Mitamura, Yoko Takatsuna, Noriaki Washio, Rie Osaka, Tetsuki Ueda, Akira Minamoto, Jiro Kogo, Fumiki Okamoto, Hiroshi Enaida, Yoshihito Sakanishi, Taiji Nagaoka, Fumi Gomi, Mariko Sasaki, Hiroto Terasaki, Takeshi Iwase, Tomoaki Tatsumi, Kosuke Nishi, Kei Shinoda, Shunichiro Ueda, Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo, Hiroyuki Nakashizuka, Toshinori Murata, Shigehiko Kitano, Taiji Sakamoto","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the real-world outcome of best-corrected visual acuity after 2-year intervention for treatment-naive diabetic macular edema since the approval of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,780 treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema for which intervention was initiated between 2015 and 2019, and which were followed for 2 years, were extracted from the longitudinal medical records of 37 retinal disease institutions in Japan. Interventions included anti-VEGF therapy, topical corticosteroid therapy, macular photocoagulation, and vitrectomy. The baseline and final best-corrected visual acuity, and the number and timing of interventions were recorded. Eyes were classified according to the year in which intervention was initiated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 2-year period, best-corrected visual acuity improved annually, finally reaching seven letters. The proportion of eyes in which good vision was maintained (best-corrected visual acuity >20/40) increased to 73.3% in the latest period. The administration of anti-VEGF therapy remained stable, accounting for approximately 90% of eyes. Notably, the proportion of eyes receiving anti-VEGF drugs as first-line treatment increased dramatically to approximately 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-VEGF therapy has become the first-line treatment since the approval of anti-VEGF drugs for diabetic macular edema. These findings reflect the evolution of diabetic macular edema treatment and highlight the superiority of anti-VEGF therapy and its increased uptake over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"335-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the real-world outcome of best-corrected visual acuity after 2-year intervention for treatment-naive diabetic macular edema since the approval of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

Methods: A total of 1,780 treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema for which intervention was initiated between 2015 and 2019, and which were followed for 2 years, were extracted from the longitudinal medical records of 37 retinal disease institutions in Japan. Interventions included anti-VEGF therapy, topical corticosteroid therapy, macular photocoagulation, and vitrectomy. The baseline and final best-corrected visual acuity, and the number and timing of interventions were recorded. Eyes were classified according to the year in which intervention was initiated.

Results: Over a 2-year period, best-corrected visual acuity improved annually, finally reaching seven letters. The proportion of eyes in which good vision was maintained (best-corrected visual acuity >20/40) increased to 73.3% in the latest period. The administration of anti-VEGF therapy remained stable, accounting for approximately 90% of eyes. Notably, the proportion of eyes receiving anti-VEGF drugs as first-line treatment increased dramatically to approximately 80%.

Conclusion: Anti-VEGF therapy has become the first-line treatment since the approval of anti-VEGF drugs for diabetic macular edema. These findings reflect the evolution of diabetic macular edema treatment and highlight the superiority of anti-VEGF therapy and its increased uptake over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗血管内皮生长因子药物时代糖尿病黄斑水肿治疗选择的改变和视觉预后:STREAT-DME 2 研究分析。
目的:评估自抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法获批以来,对治疗无效的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者进行为期2年的干预后,最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的真实世界结果:从日本37家视网膜疾病机构的纵向病历中提取了1780只在2015年至2019年期间开始干预并随访2年的DME治疗无效眼。干预措施包括抗血管内皮生长因子疗法、局部皮质类固醇疗法、黄斑光凝术和玻璃体切除术。记录了基线和最终BCVA以及干预的次数和时间。根据开始干预的年份对眼球进行分类:结果:在两年的时间里,BCVA 逐年提高,最终达到 7 个字母。视力保持良好(BCVA >20/40)的眼睛比例在最近一期增加到 73.3%。接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的眼数保持稳定,约占 90%。值得注意的是,接受抗血管内皮生长因子药物作为一线治疗的眼睛比例大幅上升至约 80%:结论:自抗血管内皮生长因子药物被批准用于 DME 治疗以来,抗血管内皮生长因子治疗已成为一线治疗方法。这些研究结果反映了 DME 治疗的演变过程,突出了抗血管内皮生长因子疗法的优越性,以及随着时间的推移,该疗法的使用率越来越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features And Prognosis Analysis Of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment In Patients With Implantable Collamer Lens. Optical density ratio as a prognostic biomarker for chronicity in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Retinal Displacement After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: Scleral Buckling versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy (The BEVERLEY Study). Early Onset Inherited Retinal Diseases: Characterizing Clinical Manifestations and Common Involved Genes. Giant Macular Hole in Regressed Retinopathy of Prematurity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1