Palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases: real-world effectiveness.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae273
Adam Brufsky, Xianchen Liu, Benjamin Li, Lynn McRoy, Connie Chen, Doris Makari, Rachel M Layman, Hope S Rugo
{"title":"Palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases: real-world effectiveness.","authors":"Adam Brufsky, Xianchen Liu, Benjamin Li, Lynn McRoy, Connie Chen, Doris Makari, Rachel M Layman, Hope S Rugo","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. Consequently, data to inform treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and CVD are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) vs an AI alone and evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database were captured for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD who initiated first-line treatment with palbociclib plus an AI or an AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cutoff: September 30, 2020). Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment patterns were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 469 patients with identifiable CVD, 160 received palbociclib plus an AI, and 309 received an AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, both median OS (40.7 vs 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.732 [95% CI, 0.537-0.997]; P = .048) and median real-world PFS (20.0 vs 12.5 months; HR, 0.679 [95% CI, 0.512-0.900]; P = .007) were significantly prolonged in patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI vs an AI alone. Among patients with a documented palbociclib starting dose, 78.5% started palbociclib at 125 mg/day, and 38.6% experienced dose adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world analysis, first-line palbociclib plus an AI was associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05361655 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. Consequently, data to inform treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and CVD are limited.

Objective: We compared the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) vs an AI alone and evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Data from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database were captured for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD who initiated first-line treatment with palbociclib plus an AI or an AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cutoff: September 30, 2020). Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment patterns were evaluated.

Results: Of the 469 patients with identifiable CVD, 160 received palbociclib plus an AI, and 309 received an AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, both median OS (40.7 vs 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.732 [95% CI, 0.537-0.997]; P = .048) and median real-world PFS (20.0 vs 12.5 months; HR, 0.679 [95% CI, 0.512-0.900]; P = .007) were significantly prolonged in patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI vs an AI alone. Among patients with a documented palbociclib starting dose, 78.5% started palbociclib at 125 mg/day, and 38.6% experienced dose adjustment.

Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, first-line palbociclib plus an AI was associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD.

Trial registration: NCT05361655 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕博西尼(Palbociclib)联合芳香化酶抑制剂治疗转移性乳腺癌和心血管疾病患者:实际效果。
背景:合并心血管疾病(CVD)的患者通常被排除在乳腺癌临床试验之外。因此,为激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HR+/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)和心血管疾病患者的治疗决策提供参考的数据非常有限:我们比较了一线帕博西尼(palbociclib)联合芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)与单独使用AI的疗效,并评估了常规临床实践中HR+/HER2- mBC和心血管疾病患者的帕博西尼治疗模式:从Flatiron健康分析数据库中获取了HR+/HER2- mBC和CVD患者的数据,这些患者在2015年2月至2020年3月期间(数据截止日期:2020年9月30日)开始接受palbociclib联合AI或单独AI的一线治疗。对总生存期(OS)、实际无进展生存期(PFS)和治疗模式进行了评估:结果:在469例可确定患有心血管疾病的患者中,160例接受了palbociclib加AI治疗,309例单独接受了AI治疗。经过稳定的逆概率治疗加权后,palbociclib联合AI与单用AI相比,中位OS(40.7个月 vs 26.5个月;危险比[HR],0.732 [95% CI,0.537-0.997];P = .048)和中位实际PFS(20.0个月 vs 12.5个月;HR,0.679 [95% CI,0.512-0.900];P = .007)均显著延长。在有palbociclib起始剂量记录的患者中,78.5%的患者从125 mg/天开始服用palbociclib,38.6%的患者经历了剂量调整:在这项真实世界分析中,对于HR+/HER2- mBC和心血管疾病患者,一线palbociclib加一种AI比单独使用AI更有效:NCT05361655(ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
Updated overall survival in patients with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the phase III TIVO-3 study. The pathologic and genomic evolution of primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective cohort study and case-control genomic analysis. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors Show Activity in Colorectal Cancer With ALK Rearrangements: Case Series and Literature Review. Primary Resistance to RET Inhibition in a RET Fusion-Positive Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Association of opioid use with survival in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: it is time for evidence-based behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1