Increasing expenditures on home- and community-based services: Do home care workers benefit?

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14399
Katherine E M Miller, Norma B Coe, Amanda R Kreider, Allison Hoffman, Katherine Rhode, Pilar Gonalons-Pons
{"title":"Increasing expenditures on home- and community-based services: Do home care workers benefit?","authors":"Katherine E M Miller, Norma B Coe, Amanda R Kreider, Allison Hoffman, Katherine Rhode, Pilar Gonalons-Pons","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of Medicaid home- and community-based services (HCBS) expenditures on the home care workforce.</p><p><strong>Data sources/study setting: </strong>We use two national, secondary data sources from 2008 to 2019: state-level Medicaid HCBS expenditures and the American Community Survey, in which we identify direct care workers in the home (i.e., home care workers), defined as nursing, psychiatric, and home health aides or personal care aides working in home health care services, individual and family services, and private households.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Our key explanatory variable is HCBS expenditures per state per year. To estimate the association between changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and the workforce size, hourly wages and hours worked, we use negative binomial, linear, and generalized ordered logit regression, respectively. All models include demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the number of potential HCBS beneficiaries (individuals with a disability and income under the federal maximum income eligibility limits), indicators for minimum wage and/or overtime protections for direct care workers, wage pass-through policies, and state and year fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>We exclude states with incomplete reporting of expenditures.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>States' HCBS expenditures increased between 2008 and 2019 after adjusting for inflation and the number of potential HCBS beneficiaries. Yet, home care workers' wages remained stagnant at $11-12/h. We find no association between changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and wages. For every additional $1 million in Medicaid HCBS expenditures, the expected number of workers increases by 1.2 and the probability of working overtime increased (0.0015% points; p < 0.05). Results are largely robust under multiple sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We find no evidence of a statistically significant relationship between changes in state-level changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and worker wages but do find a significant, but small, association with hours worked and workforce size.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association of Medicaid home- and community-based services (HCBS) expenditures on the home care workforce.

Data sources/study setting: We use two national, secondary data sources from 2008 to 2019: state-level Medicaid HCBS expenditures and the American Community Survey, in which we identify direct care workers in the home (i.e., home care workers), defined as nursing, psychiatric, and home health aides or personal care aides working in home health care services, individual and family services, and private households.

Study design: Our key explanatory variable is HCBS expenditures per state per year. To estimate the association between changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and the workforce size, hourly wages and hours worked, we use negative binomial, linear, and generalized ordered logit regression, respectively. All models include demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the number of potential HCBS beneficiaries (individuals with a disability and income under the federal maximum income eligibility limits), indicators for minimum wage and/or overtime protections for direct care workers, wage pass-through policies, and state and year fixed effects.

Data collection/extraction methods: We exclude states with incomplete reporting of expenditures.

Principal findings: States' HCBS expenditures increased between 2008 and 2019 after adjusting for inflation and the number of potential HCBS beneficiaries. Yet, home care workers' wages remained stagnant at $11-12/h. We find no association between changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and wages. For every additional $1 million in Medicaid HCBS expenditures, the expected number of workers increases by 1.2 and the probability of working overtime increased (0.0015% points; p < 0.05). Results are largely robust under multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: We find no evidence of a statistically significant relationship between changes in state-level changes in Medicaid HCBS expenditures and worker wages but do find a significant, but small, association with hours worked and workforce size.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭和社区服务支出不断增加:家庭护理人员是否受益?
目标:研究医疗补助家庭和社区服务(HCBS)支出与家庭护理人员队伍的关系:数据来源/研究环境:我们使用了 2008 年至 2019 年的两个国家二级数据来源:州一级的医疗补助家庭和社区服务支出以及美国社区调查,其中我们确定了家庭中的直接护理人员(即家庭护理人员),定义为在家庭医疗保健服务、个人和家庭服务以及私人家庭中工作的护理、精神科和家庭健康助理或个人护理助理:我们的关键解释变量是各州每年的家庭医疗服务支出。为了估算医疗补助 HCBS 支出变化与劳动力规模、小时工资和工作时间之间的关联,我们分别采用了负二项回归、线性回归和广义有序对数回归。所有模型都包括人口和社会经济特征、潜在的 HCBS 受益人(残疾且收入低于联邦最高收入资格限制的个人)数量、直接护理人员最低工资和/或加班保护指标、工资转嫁政策以及州和年份固定效应:我们排除了支出报告不完整的州:在对通货膨胀和潜在的家庭护理服务受益者人数进行调整后,各州的家庭护理服务支出在 2008 年至 2019 年期间有所增加。然而,居家护理人员的工资仍然停滞在 11-12 美元/小时。我们发现,医疗补助 HCBS 支出的变化与工资之间没有关联。医疗补助 HCBS 支出每增加 100 万美元,工人的预期人数就会增加 1.2 人,加班的概率也会增加(0.0015% 点;P 结论):我们没有发现任何证据表明州一级的医疗补助 HCBS 支出变化与工人工资之间存在显著的统计关系,但确实发现了与工作时间和劳动力规模之间存在显著但较小的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the "Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook". Connecting unstably housed veterans living in rural areas to health care: Perspectives from Health Care Navigators. A structured approach to modifying an implementation package while scaling up a complex evidence-based practice. Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users. Effect of mental health staffing inputs on initiation of care among recently separated Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1