The impacts of New York's balance billing regulation on ground ambulance pricing.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14387
Wendy Y Xu, Christopher Garmon, Sheldon M Retchin, Yiting Li
{"title":"The impacts of New York's balance billing regulation on ground ambulance pricing.","authors":"Wendy Y Xu, Christopher Garmon, Sheldon M Retchin, Yiting Li","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of New York's surprise billing regulations on price changes by emergency ground ambulance service providers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We exploited a natural experiment using a difference-in-differences design with randomization inference (RI) to examine the effects of New York state regulations on the prices of emergency ground ambulances, analyzing 2012-2019 commercial claims data. In March 2015, New York implemented a law protecting patients from surprise out-of-network (OON) balance bills, including ground ambulance services. New York's policy tied OON ground ambulance reimbursements to usual, customary, and reasonable rates that typically reflect charges. The control group consisted of similar states that never enacted surprise billing laws. Although self-funded plans are exempted from state laws, we also examined for spillover effects on self-funded plans.</p><p><strong>Data source and analytic sample: </strong>Multi-payer national commercial plan claims data were used. The study sample was selected by isolating claims involving an emergency ground ambulance activation code.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The event study findings indicated that New York's law led to a continuous increase in prices, relative to controls. The law's implementation was associated with an overall emergency ground ambulance price increase of 13 percentage points (RI p-value: 0.07). We observed a 21-percentage-point increase in in-network prices (RI p-value: 0.07) and a 19-percentage-point increase in OON prices (RI p-value: 0.07), relative to controls, for fully insured health plans. Similar changes in overall prices and in in-network prices were observed in self-insured plans. Last, our study did not find statistically significant evidence of changes in out-of-pocket cost-sharing amounts under New York's regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balance billing laws based on charges can lead to price increases for emergency ground ambulance services. Legislation intended to inoculate patients from these surprise billings for ground ambulance transportation may have unintended consequences for costs of care.</p><p><strong>What is known on this topic: </strong>Emergency ground ambulances are a major source of surprise billing. The federal No Surprises Act of 2020 excluded emergency ground ambulance services. Some states have regulations that prohibit out-of-network balance bills for ground ambulance services.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>The study provides the first empirical evidence on the potential impacts of regulations on price changes among emergency ground ambulance providers. The study offers evidence of state policies' effects on fully insured plans and potential spillover effects on self-funded plans. Experiences from New York's state ambulance out-of-network billing regulation indicate that tying reimbursement policies to charges may have the unintended consequences of increasing health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of New York's surprise billing regulations on price changes by emergency ground ambulance service providers.

Study design: We exploited a natural experiment using a difference-in-differences design with randomization inference (RI) to examine the effects of New York state regulations on the prices of emergency ground ambulances, analyzing 2012-2019 commercial claims data. In March 2015, New York implemented a law protecting patients from surprise out-of-network (OON) balance bills, including ground ambulance services. New York's policy tied OON ground ambulance reimbursements to usual, customary, and reasonable rates that typically reflect charges. The control group consisted of similar states that never enacted surprise billing laws. Although self-funded plans are exempted from state laws, we also examined for spillover effects on self-funded plans.

Data source and analytic sample: Multi-payer national commercial plan claims data were used. The study sample was selected by isolating claims involving an emergency ground ambulance activation code.

Principal findings: The event study findings indicated that New York's law led to a continuous increase in prices, relative to controls. The law's implementation was associated with an overall emergency ground ambulance price increase of 13 percentage points (RI p-value: 0.07). We observed a 21-percentage-point increase in in-network prices (RI p-value: 0.07) and a 19-percentage-point increase in OON prices (RI p-value: 0.07), relative to controls, for fully insured health plans. Similar changes in overall prices and in in-network prices were observed in self-insured plans. Last, our study did not find statistically significant evidence of changes in out-of-pocket cost-sharing amounts under New York's regulation.

Conclusions: Balance billing laws based on charges can lead to price increases for emergency ground ambulance services. Legislation intended to inoculate patients from these surprise billings for ground ambulance transportation may have unintended consequences for costs of care.

What is known on this topic: Emergency ground ambulances are a major source of surprise billing. The federal No Surprises Act of 2020 excluded emergency ground ambulance services. Some states have regulations that prohibit out-of-network balance bills for ground ambulance services.

What this study adds: The study provides the first empirical evidence on the potential impacts of regulations on price changes among emergency ground ambulance providers. The study offers evidence of state policies' effects on fully insured plans and potential spillover effects on self-funded plans. Experiences from New York's state ambulance out-of-network billing regulation indicate that tying reimbursement policies to charges may have the unintended consequences of increasing health care costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约余额计费条例对地面救护车定价的影响。
研究目的研究设计:我们利用随机化推断(RI)的差分设计进行自然实验,通过分析 2012-2019 年的商业索赔数据,研究纽约州法规对地面急救车价格的影响。2015 年 3 月,纽约州实施了一项法律,保护患者免受网络外(OON)余额账单的意外伤害,包括地面救护车服务。纽约州的政策将 OON 地面救护车的报销与通常反映收费的惯常、习惯和合理费率挂钩。对照组由从未颁布过突击收费法的类似州组成。虽然自筹资金计划不受州法律的约束,但我们也检查了自筹资金计划的溢出效应:数据来源和分析样本:我们使用了多方支付的全国商业计划索赔数据。研究样本的选择是通过分离涉及紧急地面救护车启动代码的索赔:事件研究结果表明,相对于控制措施,纽约州的法律导致价格持续上涨。该法律的实施与地面紧急救护车价格的整体上涨有关,涨幅为 13 个百分点(RI p 值:0.07)。与对照组相比,我们观察到全额投保的医疗保险计划的网络内价格上涨了 21 个百分点(相关性指标 p 值:0.07),网络外价格上涨了 19 个百分点(相关性指标 p 值:0.07)。自保计划的总体价格和网络内价格也出现了类似的变化。最后,我们的研究没有发现在纽约法规下自付费用分摊额发生变化的显著证据:结论:以收费为基础的平衡计费法可能会导致地面紧急救护服务的价格上涨。旨在使患者免受地面救护车运输意外收费的立法可能会对医疗成本产生意想不到的后果:紧急地面救护车是意外收费的主要来源。2020 年联邦《无意外法案》将地面紧急救护车服务排除在外。一些州的法规禁止地面救护车服务的网络外余额账单:本研究首次提供了有关法规对地面紧急救护服务提供商价格变化的潜在影响的经验证据。该研究提供了各州政策对全额投保计划的影响以及对自费计划的潜在溢出效应的证据。纽约州救护车网络外计费法规的经验表明,将报销政策与收费挂钩可能会产生增加医疗成本的意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the "Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook". Connecting unstably housed veterans living in rural areas to health care: Perspectives from Health Care Navigators. A structured approach to modifying an implementation package while scaling up a complex evidence-based practice. Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users. Effect of mental health staffing inputs on initiation of care among recently separated Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1