Environmentally sustainable person-centred care: Occupational therapy students' attitudes, perceptions and self-perceived preparedness for practice.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12998
Felicity Murray, Ka Yan Hess, Tanya Rihtman
{"title":"Environmentally sustainable person-centred care: Occupational therapy students' attitudes, perceptions and self-perceived preparedness for practice.","authors":"Felicity Murray, Ka Yan Hess, Tanya Rihtman","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Climate change threatens the environments in which person-centred occupational therapy occurs. Environmental sustainability is directly linked with the health and wellbeing of current and future generations, presenting occupational therapists with a unique advocacy and activist role. As practitioners of the future, there is an urgent need to understand students' attitudes, perceptions of, and self-perceived preparedness for, dealing with environmental determinants of health and intergenerational occupational and climate justice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional exploratory descriptive survey collected United Kingdom (UK) based allied health professional students' attitudes, perceptions, and self-perceived preparedness for advocating for environmental sustainability in the context of person-centred care. The survey was distributed to 48 gatekeepers in UK institutions with approved allied health professional training programmes (44 offered occupational therapy); 62 occupational therapy students responded. Descriptive and non-parametric inferential statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Text and short answers were analysed qualitatively via inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>The study was co-designed and implemented with MSc (pre-registration) occupational therapy students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (94%) expressed concerns for climate change, with 84% feeling responsible for addressing environmental sustainability in health care. While 64.5% identified climate justice as a top priority, a perceived challenge emerged between person-centred care and sustainability, with only 18% of participants feeling prepared for environmental sustainability in occupational therapy practice. Participants requested education on personal and professional sustainability practices, as well as collective action. Sharing personal climate change experiences, advocating with family and friends, and facilitating connections for collective action were highlighted as potentially transformative educational tools in this area.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occupational therapy curricula should address environmental sustainability through pragmatic, critical, and ethical lenses to enhance students' preparedness for this advocacy and activist role. Reflection and continuous professional development for environmentally sustainable practices is recommended.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Occupational therapists believe that it is important to support people to participate in occupations that matter to them. However, the activities that some people choose to participate in may have negative effects on the environment and the planet. It is important to ensure that when occupational therapists support people in their choices of activities, this does not lead to unequal access to healthy and meaningful occupations of others, now or in the future. That is because occupational therapists also have a responsibility to prevent occupational injustice. Occupational therapy students are the professionals of the future, so it is important to include them in research about this topic. They need to develop skills that allow them to simultaneously make sure that they are delivering person-centred care, which is not environmentally detrimental and that does not lead to occupational injustice. Making sure that occupational therapists provide person-centred care while also managing risks of occupational injustice may be seen as a profession-specific dilemma. In this study, occupational therapy students in the UK completed a survey about their feelings, views, and readiness for managing this dilemma. Results showed that most respondents are concerned about climate change, but do not feel that their occupational therapy education sufficiently prepared them to practise in an environmentally sustainable way. They were asked to propose ideas for addressing this issue, and the article discusses how occupational therapy curricula might be changed in accordance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Climate change threatens the environments in which person-centred occupational therapy occurs. Environmental sustainability is directly linked with the health and wellbeing of current and future generations, presenting occupational therapists with a unique advocacy and activist role. As practitioners of the future, there is an urgent need to understand students' attitudes, perceptions of, and self-perceived preparedness for, dealing with environmental determinants of health and intergenerational occupational and climate justice.

Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory descriptive survey collected United Kingdom (UK) based allied health professional students' attitudes, perceptions, and self-perceived preparedness for advocating for environmental sustainability in the context of person-centred care. The survey was distributed to 48 gatekeepers in UK institutions with approved allied health professional training programmes (44 offered occupational therapy); 62 occupational therapy students responded. Descriptive and non-parametric inferential statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Text and short answers were analysed qualitatively via inductive content analysis.

Consumer and community involvement: The study was co-designed and implemented with MSc (pre-registration) occupational therapy students.

Results: Participants (94%) expressed concerns for climate change, with 84% feeling responsible for addressing environmental sustainability in health care. While 64.5% identified climate justice as a top priority, a perceived challenge emerged between person-centred care and sustainability, with only 18% of participants feeling prepared for environmental sustainability in occupational therapy practice. Participants requested education on personal and professional sustainability practices, as well as collective action. Sharing personal climate change experiences, advocating with family and friends, and facilitating connections for collective action were highlighted as potentially transformative educational tools in this area.

Conclusion: Occupational therapy curricula should address environmental sustainability through pragmatic, critical, and ethical lenses to enhance students' preparedness for this advocacy and activist role. Reflection and continuous professional development for environmentally sustainable practices is recommended.

Plain language summary: Occupational therapists believe that it is important to support people to participate in occupations that matter to them. However, the activities that some people choose to participate in may have negative effects on the environment and the planet. It is important to ensure that when occupational therapists support people in their choices of activities, this does not lead to unequal access to healthy and meaningful occupations of others, now or in the future. That is because occupational therapists also have a responsibility to prevent occupational injustice. Occupational therapy students are the professionals of the future, so it is important to include them in research about this topic. They need to develop skills that allow them to simultaneously make sure that they are delivering person-centred care, which is not environmentally detrimental and that does not lead to occupational injustice. Making sure that occupational therapists provide person-centred care while also managing risks of occupational injustice may be seen as a profession-specific dilemma. In this study, occupational therapy students in the UK completed a survey about their feelings, views, and readiness for managing this dilemma. Results showed that most respondents are concerned about climate change, but do not feel that their occupational therapy education sufficiently prepared them to practise in an environmentally sustainable way. They were asked to propose ideas for addressing this issue, and the article discusses how occupational therapy curricula might be changed in accordance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为本的环境可持续护理:职业治疗专业学生对实践的态度、看法和自我认知准备。
导言:气候变化威胁着以人为本的职业疗法所处的环境。环境的可持续发展直接关系到当代人和子孙后代的健康和福祉,为职业治疗师提供了一个独特的宣传和活动角色。作为未来的从业人员,我们迫切需要了解学生对处理健康环境决定因素以及代际职业和气候正义的态度、看法和自我认知准备情况:一项横断面探索性描述性调查收集了英国(UK)专职医疗专业学生在以人为本的护理背景下倡导环境可持续发展方面的态度、认知和自我认知准备情况。该调查问卷分发给了英国拥有经批准的联合健康专业培训课程(44 个提供职业疗法)的院校中的 48 名把关人;62 名职业疗法专业的学生作了回复。对定量数据采用了描述性和非参数推断统计法进行分析。通过归纳内容分析对文本和简答进行了定性分析:消费者和社区参与:这项研究是与职业治疗硕士(注册前)学生共同设计和实施的:结果:94%的参与者对气候变化表示担忧,84%的参与者认为有责任在医疗保健中解决环境可持续性问题。64.5%的参与者认为气候公正是当务之急,但在以人为本的护理和可持续发展之间出现了明显的挑战,只有18%的参与者认为自己已经为职业治疗实践中的环境可持续发展做好了准备。参与者要求开展有关个人和专业可持续发展实践以及集体行动的教育。他们强调,分享个人气候变化经验、与家人和朋友一起倡导以及促进集体行动的联系,是这一领域具有潜在变革性的教育工具:职业治疗课程应通过务实、批判和伦理的视角来解决环境可持续性问题,以提高学生为扮演这一倡导者和积极分子角色所做的准备。建议对环境可持续实践进行反思和持续的专业发展。通俗易懂的语言总结:职业治疗师认为,支持人们参与对他们重要的职业是非常重要的。然而,一些人选择参与的活动可能会对环境和地球造成负面影响。重要的是,要确保职业治疗师在支持人们选择活动时,不会导致现在或将来在获得他人健康和有意义的职业方面出现不平等。这是因为职业治疗师也有责任防止职业不公正。职业治疗专业的学生是未来的专业人员,因此必须让他们参与有关这一主题的研究。他们需要掌握一些技能,以便同时确保提供以人为本的护理,既不损害环境,也不会导致职业不公正。既要确保职业治疗师提供以人为本的护理,又要控制职业不公正的风险,这可能被视为职业特有的两难选择。在这项研究中,英国的职业治疗专业学生完成了一项调查,内容涉及他们的感受、观点以及应对这一困境的准备情况。结果显示,大多数受访者关注气候变化,但认为他们所接受的职业疗法教育没有为他们以环境可持续的方式从业做好充分准备。他们被要求提出解决这一问题的想法,文章讨论了如何根据这一想法改变职业疗法课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
期刊最新文献
Interoception and its application to paediatric occupational therapy: A scoping review. The experiences of rural generalist occupational therapists in provision of palliative care in rural, regional, and remote Australia: A phenomenological inquiry. The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients. Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of the revised functional autonomy measurement system for hospitalised people: An implementation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1