Antiseizure medication practices in the adult traumatic brain injury patient population

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.009
Aubree J. Houston PharmD , Charles S. Wilson Jr PharmD, BCCCP , Brian W. Gilbert PharmD, MBA, BCCCP, FCCM, FNCS
{"title":"Antiseizure medication practices in the adult traumatic brain injury patient population","authors":"Aubree J. Houston PharmD ,&nbsp;Charles S. Wilson Jr PharmD, BCCCP ,&nbsp;Brian W. Gilbert PharmD, MBA, BCCCP, FCCM, FNCS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antiseizure medication (ASM) use in traumatic brain injuries (TBI) reduces the risk of early post-traumatic seizure (PTS). Agent selection and dosing strategies remain inconsistent among trauma centers in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the most common PTS prophylaxis regimens among adult trauma centers in brain injured patients throughout the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey assessing PTS prophylaxis practices of trauma centers was created and distributed in March 2023. Data was then evaluated based on practice site demographics and various sub-group analyses including academic vs. non-academic centers, trauma center designation, geographic practice location, and total number of TBI activations annually.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 84 different trauma centers responded of which, 82 (97.6 %) respondents reporting levetiracetam (LEV) as their ASM of choice for PTS prophylaxis. The most reported dosing regimen included an initial dose of 1000 mg (<em>n</em> = 24, 46.2 %) followed by a maintenance dose of 500 mg BID (<em>n</em> = 39, 48.8 %). There were no statistically significant differences in practice between sub-group analyses evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and relevance</h3><div>This multicenter, survey study, identified variances in practice for PTS prophylaxis for brain injured patients throughout the U.S. Interestingly, the overwhelming majority of trauma centers do not conform to the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and utilize LEV as their agent of choice. Further studies should evaluate ideal patient selection for PTS prophylaxis, optimal agent, and dosing schemes within this cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Antiseizure medication (ASM) use in traumatic brain injuries (TBI) reduces the risk of early post-traumatic seizure (PTS). Agent selection and dosing strategies remain inconsistent among trauma centers in the United States.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the most common PTS prophylaxis regimens among adult trauma centers in brain injured patients throughout the United States.

Methods

A survey assessing PTS prophylaxis practices of trauma centers was created and distributed in March 2023. Data was then evaluated based on practice site demographics and various sub-group analyses including academic vs. non-academic centers, trauma center designation, geographic practice location, and total number of TBI activations annually.

Results

A total of 84 different trauma centers responded of which, 82 (97.6 %) respondents reporting levetiracetam (LEV) as their ASM of choice for PTS prophylaxis. The most reported dosing regimen included an initial dose of 1000 mg (n = 24, 46.2 %) followed by a maintenance dose of 500 mg BID (n = 39, 48.8 %). There were no statistically significant differences in practice between sub-group analyses evaluated.

Conclusion and relevance

This multicenter, survey study, identified variances in practice for PTS prophylaxis for brain injured patients throughout the U.S. Interestingly, the overwhelming majority of trauma centers do not conform to the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and utilize LEV as their agent of choice. Further studies should evaluate ideal patient selection for PTS prophylaxis, optimal agent, and dosing schemes within this cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年脑外伤患者的抗癫痫药物治疗方法。
背景:在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中使用抗癫痫药物(ASM)可降低早期创伤后癫痫发作(PTS)的风险。美国各创伤中心的药剂选择和剂量策略仍不一致:本研究旨在确定和描述美国各地成人创伤中心对脑损伤患者最常用的 PTS 预防方案:方法: 2023 年 3 月,我们制作并分发了一份调查表,评估创伤中心的 PTS 预防方法。然后根据实践地点的人口统计学特征和各种分组分析(包括学术中心与非学术中心、创伤中心的指定、实践地点的地理位置和每年 TBI 激活的总次数)对数据进行评估:共有 84 个不同的创伤中心做出了回复,其中 82 个(97.6%)回复者称左乙拉西坦(LEV)是其预防创伤后应激障碍的首选 ASM。报告最多的给药方案包括初始剂量 1000 毫克(24 人,占 46.2%),然后是维持剂量 500 毫克,每日两次(39 人,占 48.8%)。在所评估的分组分析中,各组之间的做法没有明显的统计学差异:有趣的是,绝大多数创伤中心并不遵守脑外伤基金会的指导方针,而是将 LEV 作为首选药物。进一步的研究应评估 PTS 预防的理想患者选择、最佳药剂和剂量方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid warfare tactics and novel injury patterns in the Beirut pager explosions. Successful recovery of vision following intravenous thrombolysis using low-dose alteplase in central retinal artery occlusion. Crush syndrome and nitric oxide. Adenosine dose for supraventricular tachycardia. Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1