Trends and hospital practice variation for analgesia for children with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive pain episodes: An 11-year analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.028
Mohamed Eltorki MBChB, MSc , Matt Hall PhD , Sriram Ramgopal MD , Pradip P. Chaudhari MD , Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun MD, PhD , Chris A. Rees MD, MPH , Kelly R. Bergmann DO , Daniel J. Shapiro MD , Frank Gonzalez MD , Timothy Phamduy DO , Mark I. Neuman MD, MPH
{"title":"Trends and hospital practice variation for analgesia for children with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive pain episodes: An 11-year analysis","authors":"Mohamed Eltorki MBChB, MSc ,&nbsp;Matt Hall PhD ,&nbsp;Sriram Ramgopal MD ,&nbsp;Pradip P. Chaudhari MD ,&nbsp;Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Chris A. Rees MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kelly R. Bergmann DO ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Shapiro MD ,&nbsp;Frank Gonzalez MD ,&nbsp;Timothy Phamduy DO ,&nbsp;Mark I. Neuman MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This cross-sectional analysis of 86,111 visits for sickle cell disease and vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) in U.S. pediatric emergency departments between 2013 and 2023 shows increased use of NSAIDs, ketamine, and acetaminophen, with unchanged opioid use. Hospitals with a higher volume of VOE visits more frequently administered opioids.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are a hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to frequent emergency department (ED) visits. Effective pain management is crucial, with guidelines recommending routine use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with opioids, and emerging evidence supporting ketamine use. However, these recommendations are based on low-certainty evidence, and the impact of these guidelines on analgesia use over time remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze trends in analgesia use over an 11-year period in pediatric SCD patients presenting to U.S. EDs with VOE and assess variations in treatment across hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Pediatric Health Information System covering 34 U.S. children's hospitals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were the proportions of visits where opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and/or ketamine were administered on the first calendar day of the initial visit. Secondary outcomes included the co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess trends and hospital-level variations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 86,111 ED visits for VOE were analyzed. Opioids were administered in 82 % of encounters, NSAIDs in 72 %, acetaminophen in 17 %, and ketamine in 1 %. Co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids occurred in 59 % of the visits. Among discharged patients, there was a positive trend for NSAID use (slope: 1.68 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.91 %, 2.45 %) and NSAID-opioid co-administration (slope: 1.03 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.37 %, 1.69 %) over time. Acetaminophen use also increased over the study period (slope: 0.99 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.80 %, 1.17 %). In hospitalized patients, there was a significant upward trend for acetaminophen (slope: 1.29 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.69 %, 1.89 %) and ketamine (slope: 0.36 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.27 %, 0.45 %), while opioid use remained unchanged. Significant hospital-level variations were observed, with larger hospitals more likely to administer opioids but less likely to co-administer NSAIDs with opioids compared to medium-volume hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over the past decade, the use of NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and ketamine has increased in the management of VOE in pediatric SCD patients, while opioid use remains consistent. The co-administration of NSAIDs and opioids has also increased, reflecting guideline adherence. Variations in analgesia practices across hospitals underscore the need for standardizing pain management strategies in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073567572400545X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional analysis of 86,111 visits for sickle cell disease and vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) in U.S. pediatric emergency departments between 2013 and 2023 shows increased use of NSAIDs, ketamine, and acetaminophen, with unchanged opioid use. Hospitals with a higher volume of VOE visits more frequently administered opioids.

Background

Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are a hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to frequent emergency department (ED) visits. Effective pain management is crucial, with guidelines recommending routine use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with opioids, and emerging evidence supporting ketamine use. However, these recommendations are based on low-certainty evidence, and the impact of these guidelines on analgesia use over time remains unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to analyze trends in analgesia use over an 11-year period in pediatric SCD patients presenting to U.S. EDs with VOE and assess variations in treatment across hospitals.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Pediatric Health Information System covering 34 U.S. children's hospitals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were the proportions of visits where opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and/or ketamine were administered on the first calendar day of the initial visit. Secondary outcomes included the co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess trends and hospital-level variations.

Results

A total of 86,111 ED visits for VOE were analyzed. Opioids were administered in 82 % of encounters, NSAIDs in 72 %, acetaminophen in 17 %, and ketamine in 1 %. Co-administration of NSAIDs with opioids occurred in 59 % of the visits. Among discharged patients, there was a positive trend for NSAID use (slope: 1.68 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.91 %, 2.45 %) and NSAID-opioid co-administration (slope: 1.03 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.37 %, 1.69 %) over time. Acetaminophen use also increased over the study period (slope: 0.99 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.80 %, 1.17 %). In hospitalized patients, there was a significant upward trend for acetaminophen (slope: 1.29 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.69 %, 1.89 %) and ketamine (slope: 0.36 %/year, 95 % CI: 0.27 %, 0.45 %), while opioid use remained unchanged. Significant hospital-level variations were observed, with larger hospitals more likely to administer opioids but less likely to co-administer NSAIDs with opioids compared to medium-volume hospitals.

Conclusion

Over the past decade, the use of NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and ketamine has increased in the management of VOE in pediatric SCD patients, while opioid use remains consistent. The co-administration of NSAIDs and opioids has also increased, reflecting guideline adherence. Variations in analgesia practices across hospitals underscore the need for standardizing pain management strategies in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞病患儿血管闭塞性疼痛发作时的镇痛趋势和医院做法差异:11 年分析。
这项对2013年至2023年间美国儿科急诊部门86111例镰状细胞病和血管闭塞性发作(VOE)就诊病例的横断面分析显示,非甾体抗炎药、氯胺酮和对乙酰氨基酚的使用有所增加,而阿片类药物的使用则保持不变。VOE就诊量较高的医院更频繁地使用阿片类药物:背景:血管闭塞发作(VOE)是镰状细胞病(SCD)的特征之一,导致急诊科(ED)就诊次数频繁。有效的疼痛治疗至关重要,指南建议常规使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和阿片类药物,并有新证据支持使用氯胺酮。然而,这些建议都是基于确定性较低的证据,而且这些指南对镇痛药使用的长期影响仍不清楚:本研究旨在分析 11 年间因 VOE 而前往美国急诊室就诊的儿科 SCD 患者使用镇痛剂的趋势,并评估不同医院在治疗方面的差异:这项横断面研究使用了儿科健康信息系统(Pediatric Health Information System)的数据,涵盖了美国 34 家儿童医院,时间跨度为 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日。主要结果是在首次就诊的第一个日历日使用阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚和/或氯胺酮的就诊比例。次要结果包括非甾体抗炎药与阿片类药物的联合用药情况。采用逻辑和线性回归模型评估趋势和医院层面的差异:结果:共分析了86111例因VOE就诊的急诊患者。82%的就诊者使用了阿片类药物,72%使用了非甾体抗炎药,17%使用了对乙酰氨基酚,1%使用了氯胺酮。59%的就诊者在使用阿片类药物的同时使用了非甾体抗炎药。在出院患者中,非甾体抗炎药的使用(斜率:1.68 %/年,95 % CI:0.91 %,2.45 %)和非甾体抗炎药与阿片类药物的联合使用(斜率:1.03 %/年,95 % CI:0.37 %,1.69 %)随着时间的推移呈上升趋势。对乙酰氨基酚的使用在研究期间也有所增加(斜率:0.99%/年,95% CI:0.80%,1.17%)。在住院患者中,对乙酰氨基酚(斜率:1.29 %/年,95 % CI:0.69 %,1.89 %)和氯胺酮(斜率:0.36 %/年,95 % CI:0.27 %,0.45 %)的使用呈显著上升趋势,而阿片类药物的使用则保持不变。与中等规模的医院相比,规模较大的医院更有可能使用阿片类药物,但在使用阿片类药物的同时使用非甾体抗炎药的可能性较小:结论:在过去十年中,非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚和氯胺酮在治疗小儿 SCD 患者 VOE 方面的使用有所增加,而阿片类药物的使用则保持一致。非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物的联合用药也有所增加,这反映了对指南的遵守情况。各家医院镇痛方法的差异凸显了对这一人群实施标准化疼痛管理策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid warfare tactics and novel injury patterns in the Beirut pager explosions. Successful recovery of vision following intravenous thrombolysis using low-dose alteplase in central retinal artery occlusion. Adenosine dose for supraventricular tachycardia. Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department. Interfacial plane block: A new technique or "old wine in a new bottle"?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1