Piloting the role of the chief well-being officer in Veterans Health Administration: The auspicious start.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000918
Tamara M Schult, Mary Gallagher-Seaman, Jana Boehmer, David C Mohr, Susan Stockdale, Taylor Harris, Kavitha Reddy
{"title":"Piloting the role of the chief well-being officer in Veterans Health Administration: The auspicious start.","authors":"Tamara M Schult, Mary Gallagher-Seaman, Jana Boehmer, David C Mohr, Susan Stockdale, Taylor Harris, Kavitha Reddy","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emerging evidence from private sector hospitals indicates that a chief well-being officer (CWO) can be an impactful role to lead organizational burnout mitigation efforts in health care systems. A descriptive process evaluation was conducted to learn about facilitators and barriers of integrating this role within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). A pilot intervention inclusive of three domains-culture of well-being, efficiency of practice, and personal resilience-was implemented.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eight VA medical centers and two regional network offices received 18 months of implementation support from October 2021 to March 2023. Appointed CWOs were tasked with implementing key interventions in at least two work units at each location. Administrative records were used to track implementation progress. Surveys were administered to participating work units pre- and postintervention to assess changes in key measures. Qualitative interviews elicited information about intervention implementation including barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Not formally hiring CWOs in the role resulted in limited time to work on intervention implementation. This was insufficient and it impacted their ability to truly function in the role. Several work units experienced multiple challenges and were unable to implement the full intervention. Despite these challenges, when examining work unit changes, improvements in culture of health and well-being and change readiness were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the importance of a formalized CWO role; however, findings highlight important factors that must be addressed for successful integration of role to drive intervention effectiveness. Comprehensive interventions addressing both system- and individual-level drivers of burnout show promise for improving VA workforce well-being but warrant further study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emerging evidence from private sector hospitals indicates that a chief well-being officer (CWO) can be an impactful role to lead organizational burnout mitigation efforts in health care systems. A descriptive process evaluation was conducted to learn about facilitators and barriers of integrating this role within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). A pilot intervention inclusive of three domains-culture of well-being, efficiency of practice, and personal resilience-was implemented.

Method: Eight VA medical centers and two regional network offices received 18 months of implementation support from October 2021 to March 2023. Appointed CWOs were tasked with implementing key interventions in at least two work units at each location. Administrative records were used to track implementation progress. Surveys were administered to participating work units pre- and postintervention to assess changes in key measures. Qualitative interviews elicited information about intervention implementation including barriers and facilitators.

Results: Not formally hiring CWOs in the role resulted in limited time to work on intervention implementation. This was insufficient and it impacted their ability to truly function in the role. Several work units experienced multiple challenges and were unable to implement the full intervention. Despite these challenges, when examining work unit changes, improvements in culture of health and well-being and change readiness were observed.

Conclusion: The results support the importance of a formalized CWO role; however, findings highlight important factors that must be addressed for successful integration of role to drive intervention effectiveness. Comprehensive interventions addressing both system- and individual-level drivers of burnout show promise for improving VA workforce well-being but warrant further study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在退伍军人健康管理局试行首席福利官的角色:吉祥的开端。
导言:来自私立医院的新证据表明,首席幸福官(CWO)可以在医疗保健系统中发挥重要作用,领导缓解组织倦怠的工作。我们开展了一项描述性过程评估,以了解退伍军人健康管理局(VA)内部整合这一角色的促进因素和障碍。试点干预包括三个领域--幸福文化、实践效率和个人复原力:从 2021 年 10 月到 2023 年 3 月,八个退伍军人医疗中心和两个地区网络办事处接受了 18 个月的实施支持。被任命的 CWO 负责在每个地点的至少两个工作单位实施关键干预措施。行政记录用于跟踪实施进度。在干预前和干预后对参与的工作单位进行调查,以评估关键措施的变化。定性访谈收集了有关干预措施实施的信息,包括障碍和促进因素:没有正式聘用社区工作干事,导致他们从事干预措施实施工作的时间有限。由于时间不足,影响了他们真正发挥作用的能力。一些工作单位遇到了多重挑战,无法全面实施干预措施。尽管存在这些挑战,但在研究工作单位的变化时,还是观察到了健康和幸福文化以及变革准备方面的改进:结论:研究结果表明,正式确立首席保健官(CWO)角色非常重要;但是,研究结果也强调了成功整合角色以提高干预效果所必须解决的重要因素。针对系统和个人层面的职业倦怠驱动因素的综合干预措施有望改善退伍军人队伍的福祉,但还需要进一步研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study on the dyadic coping experience of human papillomavirus-infected patients of childbearing age and their spouses. Identifying the need for a nurse-driven palliative care intervention for American Indian and rural family caregivers. Penetration rates of behavioral health consultants targeting cardiovascular disease and associated modifiable risk factors among military health care beneficiaries. Psychiatric Health, Life Skills, and Opportunities for Wellness Program: Addressing psychiatric need through integrated consultation, collaboration, and brief episodes of care. Strengthening community capacity to address trauma through a Community Ambassador Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1