The great reconnection: Restorative justice as remedy for fragmented healthcare communities.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000904
Janet Yarboi, Kyle A Bersted, Jay M Behel
{"title":"The great reconnection: Restorative justice as remedy for fragmented healthcare communities.","authors":"Janet Yarboi, Kyle A Bersted, Jay M Behel","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exacerbated by a global pandemic, healthcare organizations have become increasingly isolated spaces and healthcare professionals suffer from threats to psychological safety, occupational burnout, and attrition. Restorative justice (RJ) is a human- and community-centered framework used to foster connections and promote healing among groups and has recently been implemented in healthcare settings. It may serve as a novel approach to promote the well-being of healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this article, we describe the conceptual underpinnings of RJ, briefly reviewing the existing literature supporting restorative approaches and exploring its early applications within healthcare. We provide a case example of our own efforts to implement an RJ program to support healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using our own program as reference, we describe how we have monitored engagement to guide program improvement and utilized participant feedback to understand impact.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>RJ offers unique potential for promoting a safe workplace for healthcare professionals and advancing inclusion in medicine. With regularly implemented restorative practices, we hope to effect lasting change within our institution (i.e., improved retention), which should be explored with future studies. In order to improve the health of diverse communities we serve, we must also prioritize the well-being of our own healthcare communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Exacerbated by a global pandemic, healthcare organizations have become increasingly isolated spaces and healthcare professionals suffer from threats to psychological safety, occupational burnout, and attrition. Restorative justice (RJ) is a human- and community-centered framework used to foster connections and promote healing among groups and has recently been implemented in healthcare settings. It may serve as a novel approach to promote the well-being of healthcare professionals.

Method: In this article, we describe the conceptual underpinnings of RJ, briefly reviewing the existing literature supporting restorative approaches and exploring its early applications within healthcare. We provide a case example of our own efforts to implement an RJ program to support healthcare professionals.

Results: Using our own program as reference, we describe how we have monitored engagement to guide program improvement and utilized participant feedback to understand impact.

Discussion: RJ offers unique potential for promoting a safe workplace for healthcare professionals and advancing inclusion in medicine. With regularly implemented restorative practices, we hope to effect lasting change within our institution (i.e., improved retention), which should be explored with future studies. In order to improve the health of diverse communities we serve, we must also prioritize the well-being of our own healthcare communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伟大的重新连接:将恢复性司法作为分散的医疗保健社区的补救措施。
导言:由于全球大流行病的加剧,医疗保健机构已成为日益孤立的空间,医疗保健专业人员的心理安全受到威胁,职业倦怠和自然减员现象日益严重。恢复性司法(RJ)是一种以人为本、以社区为中心的框架,用于促进群体间的联系和愈合,最近已在医疗机构中实施。它可以作为促进医疗保健专业人员福祉的一种新方法:在本文中,我们描述了 RJ 的概念基础,简要回顾了支持恢复性方法的现有文献,并探讨了其在医疗保健领域的早期应用。我们提供了一个案例,说明我们自己在实施 RJ 计划以支持医疗保健专业人员方面所做的努力:结果:以我们自己的计划为参考,我们描述了我们如何监测参与情况以指导计划的改进,以及如何利用参与者的反馈来了解其影响:讨论:RJ 为促进医护专业人员的工作场所安全和推动医学的包容性提供了独特的潜力。通过定期实施恢复性实践,我们希望能在我们的机构内产生持久的变化(即提高留任率),这一点应在今后的研究中加以探讨。为了改善我们所服务的多元化社区的健康状况,我们还必须优先考虑自身医疗保健社区的福祉。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study on the dyadic coping experience of human papillomavirus-infected patients of childbearing age and their spouses. Identifying the need for a nurse-driven palliative care intervention for American Indian and rural family caregivers. Penetration rates of behavioral health consultants targeting cardiovascular disease and associated modifiable risk factors among military health care beneficiaries. Psychiatric Health, Life Skills, and Opportunities for Wellness Program: Addressing psychiatric need through integrated consultation, collaboration, and brief episodes of care. Strengthening community capacity to address trauma through a Community Ambassador Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1