Methylene Blue and Blood Transfusion in Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation: An Experimental Porcine Study.

André Luppi, Agnes Afrodite S Albuquerque, Marelaine Prandi, Jessyca M Barbosa, Maria Cecília Jordani, Suely Fazio Ferraciolli, Sergio Wechsler, Paulo Roberto B Evora
{"title":"Methylene Blue and Blood Transfusion in Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation: An Experimental Porcine Study.","authors":"André Luppi, Agnes Afrodite S Albuquerque, Marelaine Prandi, Jessyca M Barbosa, Maria Cecília Jordani, Suely Fazio Ferraciolli, Sergio Wechsler, Paulo Roberto B Evora","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemorrhagic shock requires immediate treatment to prevent mortality and organ dysfunction. This study evaluates the efficacy of methylene blue (MB) with blood transfusion (BT) as a potential rescue therapy in acute severe bleeding in pigs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty animals were randomly assigned to one of six groups following the induction of fixed-pressure hemorrhagic shock, after reaching a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 55 mmHg - Group 1 (60 BT: BT after 60 minutes), Group 2 (60 MB: MB infusion after 60 minutes), Group 3 (60 MB + BT: MB and BT after 60 minutes), Group 4 (15 MB + BT: MB and BT after 15 minutes), Group 5 (15 BT + 60 MB: BT after 15 minutes and MB infusion after 60 minutes), and Group 6 (15 MB + 60 BT: MB infusion after 15 minutes and BT after 60 minutes). Hemodynamic and blood gas parameters were meticulously recorded, reversal of the shock was considered when MAP reached 90% of the baseline MAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for Group 2, all groups reverted from the shock. However, groups that received MB in combination with BT, specifically Groups 3 and 4, exhibited statistically significant higher ratios of maximum MAP to baseline MAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using MB concomitant with BT allowed the reversal of hemorrhagic shock with higher median arterial pressure levels compared to BT alone or applying MB separately from BT. This suggests that simultaneous application of MB and BT could be a more effective strategy for reversing the effects of severe acute bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"e20230480 e20230480","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhagic shock requires immediate treatment to prevent mortality and organ dysfunction. This study evaluates the efficacy of methylene blue (MB) with blood transfusion (BT) as a potential rescue therapy in acute severe bleeding in pigs.

Methods: Thirty animals were randomly assigned to one of six groups following the induction of fixed-pressure hemorrhagic shock, after reaching a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 55 mmHg - Group 1 (60 BT: BT after 60 minutes), Group 2 (60 MB: MB infusion after 60 minutes), Group 3 (60 MB + BT: MB and BT after 60 minutes), Group 4 (15 MB + BT: MB and BT after 15 minutes), Group 5 (15 BT + 60 MB: BT after 15 minutes and MB infusion after 60 minutes), and Group 6 (15 MB + 60 BT: MB infusion after 15 minutes and BT after 60 minutes). Hemodynamic and blood gas parameters were meticulously recorded, reversal of the shock was considered when MAP reached 90% of the baseline MAP.

Results: Except for Group 2, all groups reverted from the shock. However, groups that received MB in combination with BT, specifically Groups 3 and 4, exhibited statistically significant higher ratios of maximum MAP to baseline MAP.

Conclusion: Using MB concomitant with BT allowed the reversal of hemorrhagic shock with higher median arterial pressure levels compared to BT alone or applying MB separately from BT. This suggests that simultaneous application of MB and BT could be a more effective strategy for reversing the effects of severe acute bleeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失血性休克复苏中的亚甲蓝和输血:猪实验研究。
导言:失血性休克需要立即治疗,以防止死亡和器官功能障碍。本研究评估了亚甲蓝(MB)和输血(BT)作为猪急性大出血潜在抢救疗法的疗效:方法:在诱导固定压力失血性休克,平均动脉压(MAP)达到 55 mmHg 后,将 30 只动物随机分配到六个组中的一组--第 1 组(60 BT:60 分钟后 BT)、第 2 组(60 MB:60 分钟后输注 MB)、第 3 组(60 MB + BT:60 分钟后输注 MB 和 BT)、第 4 组(60 MB + BT:60 分钟后输注 MB 和 BT)、第 5 组(60 MB + BT:60 分钟后输注 MB 和 BT):第 4 组(15 MB + BT:15 分钟后注射 MB 和 BT)、第 5 组(15 BT + 60 MB:15 分钟后注射 BT,60 分钟后输注 MB)和第 6 组(15 MB + 60 BT:15 分钟后输注 MB,60 分钟后注射 BT)。对血流动力学和血气参数进行了详细记录,当血压达到基线血压的 90% 时即认为休克逆转:除第 2 组外,其他各组均从休克中恢复。然而,同时接受 MB 和 BT 的组别,特别是第 3 组和第 4 组,其最大血压与基线血压之比明显高于其他组别:结论:与单独使用 BT 或在 BT 之外单独使用 MB 相比,在使用 BT 的同时使用 MB 可以逆转失血性休克,且中位动脉压水平更高。这表明,同时使用 MB 和 BT 可能是逆转严重急性出血影响的更有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multisociety endorsement of the 2024 European guideline recommendations on coronary revascularization. Effects of Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Usage and Different Cannulation Techniques on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Terms of Organ Perfusion. Survival and Mid-Term Outcomes of On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in A First Peruvian Registry. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Plus Mitral Valve Plasty May Not Provide More Advantage in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Retrospective Cohort Study. The Effect of Silymarin on the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1