Tian Wang, Matthew Pelletier, James Johnson, Courtney Kline, William Walsh, Craig Lareau, David Safranski
{"title":"Biomechanical Performance of 4-Leg Sustained Dynamic Compression Staples in First Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis.","authors":"Tian Wang, Matthew Pelletier, James Johnson, Courtney Kline, William Walsh, Craig Lareau, David Safranski","doi":"10.1177/19386400241281898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\n <i>This study investigates the biomechanical efficacy of new 4-leg Sustained Dynamic Compression (SDC) NiTiNOL staples, hypothesized to offer superior stability and resilience to loading before fusion completion, compared with conventional hardware.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\n <i>Twenty sawbones left full foot models were divided into 4 treatment groups: (1) 4-leg Inline Staple, (2) 4-leg Inline Staple + 2-leg Staple, (3) 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw, and (4) Plate + Screw. An osteotomy was performed to simulate a Lapidus procedure, and the respective fixation methods were applied. Mechanical testing was conducted using a servo-hydraulic testing machine to evaluate constructs' load, contact force, contact area, and plantar gap.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>The 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw group demonstrated significantly increased joint contact force, joint contact area, and decreased plantar gap compared with the Plate + Screw group, both before and after cyclic testing. All SDC-containing constructs exhibited post-cyclic joint contact areas that were 2.36</i>×, <i>3.87</i>×, <i>and 5.49</i>× <i>greater than the post-cyclic plate + screw group. Most notably, the 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw group maintained a plantar gap of less than 3 mm throughout the testing, unlike other groups.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <i>The 4-leg Inline SDC Staple, particularly when combined with a static screw, demonstrated biomechanical superiority over traditional plate and screw constructs in Lapidus procedures. These findings suggest a promising avenue for enhanced post-operative stability, which could translate into quicker patient recovery, improved fusion rates, and potentially lower non-union rates. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these biomechanical advantages in patient outcomes.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong><i>Therapeutic, Level V: Bench Testing</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241281898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241281898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the biomechanical efficacy of new 4-leg Sustained Dynamic Compression (SDC) NiTiNOL staples, hypothesized to offer superior stability and resilience to loading before fusion completion, compared with conventional hardware.
Methods: Twenty sawbones left full foot models were divided into 4 treatment groups: (1) 4-leg Inline Staple, (2) 4-leg Inline Staple + 2-leg Staple, (3) 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw, and (4) Plate + Screw. An osteotomy was performed to simulate a Lapidus procedure, and the respective fixation methods were applied. Mechanical testing was conducted using a servo-hydraulic testing machine to evaluate constructs' load, contact force, contact area, and plantar gap.
Results: The 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw group demonstrated significantly increased joint contact force, joint contact area, and decreased plantar gap compared with the Plate + Screw group, both before and after cyclic testing. All SDC-containing constructs exhibited post-cyclic joint contact areas that were 2.36×, 3.87×, and 5.49× greater than the post-cyclic plate + screw group. Most notably, the 4-leg Inline Staple + Screw group maintained a plantar gap of less than 3 mm throughout the testing, unlike other groups.
Conclusions: The 4-leg Inline SDC Staple, particularly when combined with a static screw, demonstrated biomechanical superiority over traditional plate and screw constructs in Lapidus procedures. These findings suggest a promising avenue for enhanced post-operative stability, which could translate into quicker patient recovery, improved fusion rates, and potentially lower non-union rates. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these biomechanical advantages in patient outcomes.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic, Level V: Bench Testing.