Fulfilling the criteria for CLP classification: the implications for substances under the EU chemicals legislation.

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2024.1452065
Diana Kättström, Anna Beronius, Urban Boije Af Gennäs, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand
{"title":"Fulfilling the criteria for CLP classification: the implications for substances under the EU chemicals legislation.","authors":"Diana Kättström, Anna Beronius, Urban Boije Af Gennäs, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2024.1452065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The CLP mandates manufacturers and importers to classify substances and mixtures according to hazard criteria, with notifications submitted to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Substances meeting hazard criteria must be appropriately labelled and packaged to communicate hazards effectively. The CLP establishes hazard classification criteria but does not independently prohibit or restrict the use of hazardous chemicals. Instead, it serves as a basis for regulatory obligations in other specific regulations. This study investigates the regulatory implications of meeting hazard criteria under the CLP across EU regulations and directives listed in EU Chemicals Legislation Finder (EUCLEF). The results show that fulfilling criteria for human health hazard classes trigger regulatory obligations in the highest number of regulations/directives, with carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity (CMR) leading to obligations in 19 of 20 pieces of legislation linked to the CLP. Conversely, physical, environmental, and ozone layer hazards are associated with fewer regulations and directives, and lead to fewer prohibitions. The study underscores the pivotal role of the CLP in EU chemical legislation and the need for coherence and consistency across regulations. While regulatory obligations are primarily aimed at substances meeting hazard criteria, the variability in self-classification notifications and limitations in harmonized classification processes were observed. Moreover, the complexity of the regulatory structure poses challenges for stakeholders and policymakers, including inconsistencies, compliance difficulties, and the need for frequent revisions. Addressing these challenges is critical for enhancing regulatory effectiveness and ensuring a more coherent and harmonized approach to chemical management in the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1452065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CLP mandates manufacturers and importers to classify substances and mixtures according to hazard criteria, with notifications submitted to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Substances meeting hazard criteria must be appropriately labelled and packaged to communicate hazards effectively. The CLP establishes hazard classification criteria but does not independently prohibit or restrict the use of hazardous chemicals. Instead, it serves as a basis for regulatory obligations in other specific regulations. This study investigates the regulatory implications of meeting hazard criteria under the CLP across EU regulations and directives listed in EU Chemicals Legislation Finder (EUCLEF). The results show that fulfilling criteria for human health hazard classes trigger regulatory obligations in the highest number of regulations/directives, with carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity (CMR) leading to obligations in 19 of 20 pieces of legislation linked to the CLP. Conversely, physical, environmental, and ozone layer hazards are associated with fewer regulations and directives, and lead to fewer prohibitions. The study underscores the pivotal role of the CLP in EU chemical legislation and the need for coherence and consistency across regulations. While regulatory obligations are primarily aimed at substances meeting hazard criteria, the variability in self-classification notifications and limitations in harmonized classification processes were observed. Moreover, the complexity of the regulatory structure poses challenges for stakeholders and policymakers, including inconsistencies, compliance difficulties, and the need for frequent revisions. Addressing these challenges is critical for enhancing regulatory effectiveness and ensuring a more coherent and harmonized approach to chemical management in the EU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满足 CLP 分类标准:欧盟化学品立法对物质的影响。
CLP 要求制造商和进口商根据危害标准对物质和混合物进行分类,并向欧洲化学品管理局 (ECHA) 提交通知。符合危害标准的物质必须贴上适当的标签并进行包装,以有效传达危害信息。CLP 制定了危害分类标准,但并不单独禁止或限制使用危险化学品。相反,它是其他具体法规中监管义务的基础。本研究调查了欧盟化学品立法搜索器(EUCLEF)中列出的欧盟法规和指令中,满足 CLP 危险标准的监管影响。结果表明,满足人体健康危害类别的标准会触发最多法规/指令中的监管义务,其中致癌性、诱变性和生殖毒性(CMR)会导致与 CLP 相关的 20 项法规中的 19 项产生监管义务。相反,与物理、环境和臭氧层危害相关的法规和指令较少,导致的禁令也较少。这项研究强调了 CLP 在欧盟化学品立法中的关键作用,以及各法规之间保持连贯性和一致性的必要性。虽然监管义务主要针对符合危害标准的物质,但也观察到了自我分类通知的差异性和统一分类流程的局限性。此外,监管结构的复杂性也给利益相关者和政策制定者带来了挑战,包括不一致、合规困难以及需要频繁修订。应对这些挑战对于提高监管效力和确保欧盟在化学品管理方面采用更加一致和协调的方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new approach methodology to identify tumorigenic chemicals using short-term exposures and transcript profiling. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of triclosan exposure on human semen quality. Reproductive toxicology: keeping up with our changing world. Microplastics and nanoplastics in cardiovascular disease-a narrative review with worrying links. Ergot alkaloid control in biotechnological processes and pharmaceuticals (a mini review).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1