Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards.

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae443
Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati, Michael Hill, Natalie K Boyle, Pierre Ouvrard, Adrien Sicard, Christina M Grozinger
{"title":"Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards.","authors":"Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati, Michael Hill, Natalie K Boyle, Pierre Ouvrard, Adrien Sicard, Christina M Grozinger","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollinator-plant interactions represent a core mutualism that underpins biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems, and the loss of flowering plants is a major driver of pollinator declines. Bee attraction to flowers is mediated by both quantity of resources (the number of available flowers for exploration) and quality of resources (pollen nutritional value), but whether and how bees prioritize these factors is not well understood. Here, we leveraged a unique plant system to investigate the floral factors influencing bee foraging decisions. Recombinant inbred plant lines were generated by crossing the self-fertilizing <i>Capsella rubella</i> and the pollinator-dependent outcrosser <i>C. grandiflora</i>, to produce plants that varied across floral traits. Using enclosed arenas, we evaluated the foraging behavior of two solitary bee species, <i>Osmia cornifrons</i> and <i>Megachile rotundata</i>, to the isolated inflorescences from these lines. Visits from <i>O. cornifrons</i> were significantly positively correlated with the number of flowers, while <i>M. rotundata</i> visits were significantly positively associated with pollen nutrition, with a preference for plants with higher pollen protein-to-lipid content. Further experiments using artificial flowers confirmed that <i>M. rotundata</i> preferred flowers with higher protein:lipid ratios, while <i>O. cornifrons</i> visits were unaffected by nutrition. These studies demonstrate that, although both bee species collect pollen as their sole source of protein and lipids for themselves and/or their offspring, they differentially prioritize resource quantity (number of flowers) and quality (pollen nutritional content). These studies lay the groundwork for understanding how different foraging strategies evolved, and influence, plant-pollinator ecological networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pollinator-plant interactions represent a core mutualism that underpins biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems, and the loss of flowering plants is a major driver of pollinator declines. Bee attraction to flowers is mediated by both quantity of resources (the number of available flowers for exploration) and quality of resources (pollen nutritional value), but whether and how bees prioritize these factors is not well understood. Here, we leveraged a unique plant system to investigate the floral factors influencing bee foraging decisions. Recombinant inbred plant lines were generated by crossing the self-fertilizing Capsella rubella and the pollinator-dependent outcrosser C. grandiflora, to produce plants that varied across floral traits. Using enclosed arenas, we evaluated the foraging behavior of two solitary bee species, Osmia cornifrons and Megachile rotundata, to the isolated inflorescences from these lines. Visits from O. cornifrons were significantly positively correlated with the number of flowers, while M. rotundata visits were significantly positively associated with pollen nutrition, with a preference for plants with higher pollen protein-to-lipid content. Further experiments using artificial flowers confirmed that M. rotundata preferred flowers with higher protein:lipid ratios, while O. cornifrons visits were unaffected by nutrition. These studies demonstrate that, although both bee species collect pollen as their sole source of protein and lipids for themselves and/or their offspring, they differentially prioritize resource quantity (number of flowers) and quality (pollen nutritional content). These studies lay the groundwork for understanding how different foraging strategies evolved, and influence, plant-pollinator ecological networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
觅食蜂种类对花卉奖励的数量和质量有不同的优先考虑。
授粉昆虫与植物之间的相互作用是陆地生态系统生物多样性的核心互惠关系,而开花植物的减少是授粉昆虫减少的主要原因。蜜蜂对花朵的吸引力受资源数量(可供探索的花朵数量)和资源质量(花粉营养价值)两方面因素的影响,但蜜蜂是否以及如何优先考虑这些因素还不十分清楚。在这里,我们利用一个独特的植物系统来研究影响蜜蜂觅食决策的花卉因素。通过将自花受精的红帽草与依赖授粉者的外交植物 C. grandiflora 杂交,产生了重组近交植物品系,从而培育出不同花性状的植物。我们利用封闭的竞技场,评估了两种独居蜜蜂(茭白和Megachile rotundata)对这些品系的分离花序的觅食行为。禾花茭的觅食行为与花朵数量呈显著正相关,而Megachile rotundata的觅食行为则与花粉营养成分呈显著正相关,它们偏好花粉蛋白质-脂质含量较高的植物。使用人造花进行的进一步实验证实,M. rotundata 喜欢蛋白质与脂质比率较高的花,而 O. cornifrons 的访问量则不受营养的影响。这些研究表明,虽然两种蜜蜂都采集花粉作为自身和/或后代的蛋白质和脂质的唯一来源,但它们对资源数量(花朵数量)和质量(花粉营养成分)的优先考虑是不同的。这些研究为了解不同的觅食策略如何演变并影响植物-传粉昆虫生态网络奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pollen foraging mediates exposure to dichotomous stressor syndromes in honey bees. Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States. Attraction to politically extreme users on social media. Critical thinking and misinformation vulnerability: experimental evidence from Colombia. Descriptive norms can "backfire" in hyper-polarized contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1