Diagnostic process of cancer in a health system without gatekeeping: a single centre survey analysis.

Ayşenur Duman Dilbaz, Saliha Serap Çifçili
{"title":"Diagnostic process of cancer in a health system without gatekeeping: a single centre survey analysis.","authors":"Ayşenur Duman Dilbaz, Saliha Serap Çifçili","doi":"10.1017/S146342362400029X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is essential to increase the rates of early diagnosis in cancer control, and the diagnostic process needs to be improved to achieve this goal. Previous studies showed that in countries where there is a gatekeeping system, there might be a delay in cancer diagnosis. Our aim is to examine the process of cancer diagnosis in a healthcare system without gatekeeping.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative descriptive study has been conducted in various outpatient clinics of Pendik Training and Research Hospital, between 1 February and 31 May 2019, with individuals aged over 18 and diagnosed with cancer in the last six months. The data was collected through a questionnaire filled in by face-to-face interview method. Patient's socio-economic characteristics, their symptoms at the time of the diagnosis and the diagnosis process were questioned.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median diagnostic interval was 30 days (min-max 1-365), and the median patient interval was 60 (1-600) days. Patients pointed out that the diagnostic tests, especially the pathology reporting process, caused the diagnostic interval to be prolonged. Of the patients, 84% (<i>n</i> 135) stated that they did not consider their symptoms as a sign of serious illness. The patient interval was shortest with symptoms of haematuria and haematochezia and longest with dysuria and change in bladder habit.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study examined the diagnosis process in our health system, where patients can apply for health services at any stage. The results showed that there were no superior outcomes to those observed in primary care-led health systems. Patients reported that waiting times for medical tests led to prolongation of the diagnosis time. Cancer awareness of patients should also be increased to shorten patient admission times.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S146342362400029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is essential to increase the rates of early diagnosis in cancer control, and the diagnostic process needs to be improved to achieve this goal. Previous studies showed that in countries where there is a gatekeeping system, there might be a delay in cancer diagnosis. Our aim is to examine the process of cancer diagnosis in a healthcare system without gatekeeping.

Method: A quantitative descriptive study has been conducted in various outpatient clinics of Pendik Training and Research Hospital, between 1 February and 31 May 2019, with individuals aged over 18 and diagnosed with cancer in the last six months. The data was collected through a questionnaire filled in by face-to-face interview method. Patient's socio-economic characteristics, their symptoms at the time of the diagnosis and the diagnosis process were questioned.

Result: The median diagnostic interval was 30 days (min-max 1-365), and the median patient interval was 60 (1-600) days. Patients pointed out that the diagnostic tests, especially the pathology reporting process, caused the diagnostic interval to be prolonged. Of the patients, 84% (n 135) stated that they did not consider their symptoms as a sign of serious illness. The patient interval was shortest with symptoms of haematuria and haematochezia and longest with dysuria and change in bladder habit.

Discussion: The study examined the diagnosis process in our health system, where patients can apply for health services at any stage. The results showed that there were no superior outcomes to those observed in primary care-led health systems. Patients reported that waiting times for medical tests led to prolongation of the diagnosis time. Cancer awareness of patients should also be increased to shorten patient admission times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有把关的医疗系统中的癌症诊断过程:单一中心调查分析。
导言:在癌症控制中,提高早期诊断率至关重要,而要实现这一目标,就必须改进诊断过程。以往的研究表明,在实行把关制度的国家,癌症诊断可能会出现延误。我们的目的是研究没有把关制度的医疗系统中的癌症诊断过程:方法:2019 年 2 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日期间,我们在彭迪克培训与研究医院的多个门诊诊所开展了一项定量描述性研究,研究对象为年龄在 18 岁以上、在过去 6 个月中被诊断出患有癌症的人。数据通过面对面访谈法填写的调查问卷收集。调查内容包括患者的社会经济特征、诊断时的症状以及诊断过程:结果:诊断间隔中位数为 30 天(最小值-最大值为 1-365),患者间隔中位数为 60 天(1-600)。患者指出,诊断检查,尤其是病理报告过程导致诊断间隔延长。84%的患者(135 人)表示,他们并不认为自己的症状是严重疾病的征兆。患者出现血尿和血尿症状的间隔时间最短,出现排尿困难和膀胱习惯改变的间隔时间最长:本研究考察了我国医疗系统的诊断过程,患者可在任何阶段申请医疗服务。结果显示,与以初级保健为主导的医疗系统相比,该系统的诊断结果并无优势。患者表示,医疗检查的等待时间导致诊断时间延长。此外,还应提高患者对癌症的认识,以缩短患者的入院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy ageing in long-term care? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: a position paper. Early structured communication between general practitioner, sick-listed patient, and employer: Results and lessons learned from a pragmatic trial in the Capacity Note project. The impact of COVID-19 on referrals among general practitioners and specialists in Shanghai, China. The unrevealed links: periodontal health, human milk composition, and infant gut microbiome dynamics. Primary healthcare as a strategy for eliminating hepatitis C: the METRIC toolkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1