Advancing Precision Oncology: Whole-Exome Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer Liquid-Based Cytology.

Reika Takamatsu, Kohei Nakamura, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosuke Tsuji, Ryutaro Kawano, Naoki Yoshimi, Wataru Yamagami, Hiroshi Nishihara
{"title":"Advancing Precision Oncology: Whole-Exome Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer Liquid-Based Cytology.","authors":"Reika Takamatsu, Kohei Nakamura, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosuke Tsuji, Ryutaro Kawano, Naoki Yoshimi, Wataru Yamagami, Hiroshi Nishihara","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0137-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Diagnostic strategies for endometrial cancer have been evolving, with cytologic analysis being considered a key method in integrated oncologic diagnostics because of its less invasive nature and adaptability to various assessments. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has emerged as a promising method for intact DNA preservation; it exhibits improved efficiency in advanced sequencing applications such as next-generation sequencing. However, despite the use of LBC in panel assays, its application in whole-exome sequencing (WES) for comprehensive genomic profiling remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To investigate whether molecular classification is possible based on WES using DNA derived from LBC specimens.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We combined WES with targeted gene panel analysis to compare genomic findings of LBC and traditional tissue samples obtained from 7 cases of endometrial cancer. We investigated pathogenic mutations, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability, and achieved molecular classification with high accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>We found a substantial concordance between LBC and traditional tissue samples in terms of pathogenic mutation detection, with a 95% match in the LBC samples and 94% in the tissue samples. Notably, our results highlight the importance of combining WES with panel-based analysis in identifying the ultramutated status of a case that had been missed during panel analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Our findings emphasize the potential of LBC samples in the precise and noninvasive genomic analysis of cases of endometrial cancer and offer a new avenue for developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"561-567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0137-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Diagnostic strategies for endometrial cancer have been evolving, with cytologic analysis being considered a key method in integrated oncologic diagnostics because of its less invasive nature and adaptability to various assessments. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has emerged as a promising method for intact DNA preservation; it exhibits improved efficiency in advanced sequencing applications such as next-generation sequencing. However, despite the use of LBC in panel assays, its application in whole-exome sequencing (WES) for comprehensive genomic profiling remains underexplored.

Objective.—: To investigate whether molecular classification is possible based on WES using DNA derived from LBC specimens.

Design.—: We combined WES with targeted gene panel analysis to compare genomic findings of LBC and traditional tissue samples obtained from 7 cases of endometrial cancer. We investigated pathogenic mutations, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability, and achieved molecular classification with high accuracy.

Results.—: We found a substantial concordance between LBC and traditional tissue samples in terms of pathogenic mutation detection, with a 95% match in the LBC samples and 94% in the tissue samples. Notably, our results highlight the importance of combining WES with panel-based analysis in identifying the ultramutated status of a case that had been missed during panel analysis.

Conclusions.—: Our findings emphasize the potential of LBC samples in the precise and noninvasive genomic analysis of cases of endometrial cancer and offer a new avenue for developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in precision oncology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进精准肿瘤学:子宫内膜癌全基因组测序液基细胞学。
背景子宫内膜癌的诊断策略一直在不断发展,细胞学分析因其微创性和对各种评估的适应性而被视为综合肿瘤诊断的关键方法。液基细胞学(LBC)已成为一种很有前景的完整保存DNA的方法;它在下一代测序等高级测序应用中表现出更高的效率。然而,尽管 LBC 可用于面板检测,但其在全外显子组测序(WES)中用于全面基因组剖析的应用仍未得到充分探索:研究是否可以利用 LBC 标本的 DNA 在 WES 基础上进行分子分类:我们将 WES 与靶向基因面板分析相结合,比较了从 7 例子宫内膜癌中获得的 LBC 和传统组织样本的基因组结果。我们研究了致病突变、肿瘤突变负荷和微卫星不稳定性,并实现了高准确度的分子分类:我们发现 LBC 与传统组织样本在致病突变检测方面具有很高的一致性,LBC 样本的匹配率为 95%,组织样本的匹配率为 94%。值得注意的是,我们的研究结果强调了将 WES 与基于面板的分析相结合,对确定面板分析中遗漏的病例的超突变状态的重要性:我们的研究结果强调了 LBC 样本在对子宫内膜癌病例进行精确、无创基因组分析方面的潜力,并为精准肿瘤学诊断和治疗策略的开发提供了一条新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors in Developing Countries: Challenges, Opportunities, and Feasibility in a Pathology Reference Laboratory. CD274 Alterations and PD-L1 Expression on Tumor Cells and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Melanoma: Relationships to Histopathologic Features and Outcomes. Clinical Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Lymph Node Evaluation in Metastatic Gastric, Colorectal, and Breast Cancer. A Departmental Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Survey, and Identification of Action Items, to Improve the Climate in Pathology and Laboratory Medicine in One Academic Medical Center. Pediatric Sarcomas With BCOR and CIC Aberrations: Advanced Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1