Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S440072
Alan W Kong, Adrian Au, Weilin Song, Angela J Oh, Tara A McCannel
{"title":"Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma.","authors":"Alan W Kong, Adrian Au, Weilin Song, Angela J Oh, Tara A McCannel","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S440072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distinguishing an iris melanoma from an iris nevus can be challenging as few clinical features other than documented growth are helpful in making the diagnosis. In this study, we compared the presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and iris nevus.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients treated for iris melanoma and iris nevus from January 2013 to October 2022. Thirty-nine subjects with iris melanoma and forty age-matched patients with iris nevus were included. We analyzed the difference in IOP, CDR, and diagnosis of glaucoma between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and control iris nevus cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average IOP for eyes with iris melanoma and iris nevus was 18.8±6.1 mmHg and 14.6±3.5 mmHg (P<0.001), respectively. The average CDR was 0.36±0.27 and 0.24±0.14 (P=0.02), respectively. The average IOP of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma patients was 16.3±3.5 mmHg, significantly less than the affected eye (P=0.03). The average CDR of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma was 0.25±0.15, which was trending towards being less than the affected eye (P=0.05). There was no difference in the average IOP (P=0.89) or average CDR (P=0.49) between the affected and unaffected eye in patients with iris nevus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate that patients with iris melanoma are more likely to have greater IOP and CDR in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye, and a diagnosis of unilateral glaucoma than eyes with iris nevus. Patients with iris melanoma had greater IOP asymmetry between the affected and unaffected eye. Therefore, IOP and CDR asymmetry may suggest a diagnosis of iris melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S440072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Distinguishing an iris melanoma from an iris nevus can be challenging as few clinical features other than documented growth are helpful in making the diagnosis. In this study, we compared the presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and iris nevus.

Patients and methods: This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients treated for iris melanoma and iris nevus from January 2013 to October 2022. Thirty-nine subjects with iris melanoma and forty age-matched patients with iris nevus were included. We analyzed the difference in IOP, CDR, and diagnosis of glaucoma between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and control iris nevus cohort.

Results: The average IOP for eyes with iris melanoma and iris nevus was 18.8±6.1 mmHg and 14.6±3.5 mmHg (P<0.001), respectively. The average CDR was 0.36±0.27 and 0.24±0.14 (P=0.02), respectively. The average IOP of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma patients was 16.3±3.5 mmHg, significantly less than the affected eye (P=0.03). The average CDR of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma was 0.25±0.15, which was trending towards being less than the affected eye (P=0.05). There was no difference in the average IOP (P=0.89) or average CDR (P=0.49) between the affected and unaffected eye in patients with iris nevus.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that patients with iris melanoma are more likely to have greater IOP and CDR in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye, and a diagnosis of unilateral glaucoma than eyes with iris nevus. Patients with iris melanoma had greater IOP asymmetry between the affected and unaffected eye. Therefore, IOP and CDR asymmetry may suggest a diagnosis of iris melanoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断虹膜黑色素瘤时的眼压和杯盘比不对称。
目的:将虹膜黑色素瘤与虹膜痣区分开来很有难度,因为除了有据可查的生长情况外,几乎没有其他临床特征有助于诊断。在这项研究中,我们比较了虹膜黑色素瘤和虹膜痣患者患病眼和未患病眼的眼压(IOP)和杯盘比(CDR):这是一项单一机构的回顾性病例系列研究,研究对象是2013年1月至2022年10月期间接受过虹膜黑色素瘤和虹膜痣治疗的患者。共纳入 39 名虹膜黑色素瘤患者和 40 名年龄匹配的虹膜痣患者。我们分析了虹膜黑色素瘤患者和对照组虹膜痣患者患眼与未患眼在眼压、CDR和青光眼诊断方面的差异:结果:虹膜黑色素瘤患者和虹膜痣对照组的平均眼压分别为 18.8±6.1 mmHg 和 14.6±3.5 mmHg(PC):我们的研究表明,与虹膜痣患者相比,虹膜黑色素瘤患者患眼的眼压和CDR更有可能高于未患眼且更有可能被诊断为单侧青光眼。虹膜黑色素瘤患者患眼和非患眼间的眼压不对称程度更高。因此,眼压和 CDR 不对称可能提示虹膜黑色素瘤的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter]. Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1