Differentiating primary from metastatic ovarian tumors of gastrointestinal origin by CT.

Olivia Li, Aya Hamadeh, Ali Pourvaziri, Sarah Mercaldo, Jeffrey Clark, Katherine McLay, Mukesh Harisinghani
{"title":"Differentiating primary from metastatic ovarian tumors of gastrointestinal origin by CT.","authors":"Olivia Li, Aya Hamadeh, Ali Pourvaziri, Sarah Mercaldo, Jeffrey Clark, Katherine McLay, Mukesh Harisinghani","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine differentiating CT imaging features of primary ovarian cancers from ovarian metastases of gastrointestinal origin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of 50 patients with new ovarian lesions on CT, half were primary ovarian cancers and half gastrointestinal metastases. Two blinded independent readers described tumor characteristics on CT (size, laterality, margin, etc.) and ancillary features (ascites, peritoneal seeding, lymphadenopathy, etc.). Patient age, sex, cancer history, and tumor marker levels for CA-125 and CEA were collected. Wilcoxon test and Pearson's chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 patients with mean age of 62.1 years were included. Ovarian metastases were more likely to be cystic/mainly cystic (p=0.013), have smooth margins (p=0.011), and have no/mild enhancement (p<0.001). Primary ovarian lesions were associated with moderate to large volume of ascites (p=0.047) and more commonly seen with lymphadenopathy (p=0.008). Laterality was not significantly different between the two groups. CA-125 level was more commonly elevated in primary ovarian lesions (87% vs 50%, p=0.018), and with much higher values (1076.5 vs 155.1, p=0.013). CEA level was more commonly elevated in metastatic ovarian lesions (83.3% vs 15.4%, p<0.001), and with higher values (72.4 vs 2.1, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ovarian metastases were more frequently smooth-margined and cystic with little enhancement. Primary ovarian lesions were more commonly associated with lymphadenopathy and larger volume of ascites. Tumor markers CEA and CA-125 were more frequently elevated in metastatic and primary lesions, respectively. Cancer history was the only variable that increased the odds of metastasis and therefore it is important to always correlate with history of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.10.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine differentiating CT imaging features of primary ovarian cancers from ovarian metastases of gastrointestinal origin.

Methods: Retrospective study of 50 patients with new ovarian lesions on CT, half were primary ovarian cancers and half gastrointestinal metastases. Two blinded independent readers described tumor characteristics on CT (size, laterality, margin, etc.) and ancillary features (ascites, peritoneal seeding, lymphadenopathy, etc.). Patient age, sex, cancer history, and tumor marker levels for CA-125 and CEA were collected. Wilcoxon test and Pearson's chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: 50 patients with mean age of 62.1 years were included. Ovarian metastases were more likely to be cystic/mainly cystic (p=0.013), have smooth margins (p=0.011), and have no/mild enhancement (p<0.001). Primary ovarian lesions were associated with moderate to large volume of ascites (p=0.047) and more commonly seen with lymphadenopathy (p=0.008). Laterality was not significantly different between the two groups. CA-125 level was more commonly elevated in primary ovarian lesions (87% vs 50%, p=0.018), and with much higher values (1076.5 vs 155.1, p=0.013). CEA level was more commonly elevated in metastatic ovarian lesions (83.3% vs 15.4%, p<0.001), and with higher values (72.4 vs 2.1, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Ovarian metastases were more frequently smooth-margined and cystic with little enhancement. Primary ovarian lesions were more commonly associated with lymphadenopathy and larger volume of ascites. Tumor markers CEA and CA-125 were more frequently elevated in metastatic and primary lesions, respectively. Cancer history was the only variable that increased the odds of metastasis and therefore it is important to always correlate with history of cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 CT 鉴别胃肠道来源的原发性和转移性卵巢肿瘤。
目的:确定原发性卵巢癌与胃肠道源性卵巢转移瘤的 CT 成像特征:回顾性研究:50 例 CT 检查发现卵巢新病变的患者,其中一半为原发性卵巢癌,一半为胃肠道转移瘤。两名独立的盲人阅片员描述 CT 上的肿瘤特征(大小、侧位、边缘等)和辅助特征(腹水、腹膜播散、淋巴结病等)。收集了患者的年龄、性别、癌症病史以及 CA-125 和 CEA 的肿瘤标志物水平。统计分析采用 Wilcoxon 检验和皮尔逊卡方检验:结果:共纳入 50 名患者,平均年龄为 62.1 岁。卵巢转移灶更倾向于囊性/主要为囊性(P=0.013)、边缘光滑(P=0.011)、无/轻度强化(P结论:卵巢转移灶更倾向于囊性/主要为囊性(P=0.013)、边缘光滑(P=0.011)、无/轻度强化(P=0.011):卵巢转移瘤多为边缘光滑、囊性且几乎无强化。原发性卵巢病变多伴有淋巴结病和较大的腹水。肿瘤标志物CEA和CA-125分别在转移灶和原发灶中更常升高。癌症史是增加转移几率的唯一变量,因此必须始终与癌症史相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiology quick cash? Kickbacks, compliance, and consequences. Preliminary investigation: Feasibility study of a virtual reality breast biopsy simulation. Musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program directors: A study of educational paths, and scholarly engagement in the United States. Clinical opinion spotlight: A sustainable model for improving access to mobile mammography for underserved populations. Is there still protected health information in openly available PowerPoint files?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1