Can salivary cortisol be used in diagnosing adrenal insufficiency during the acute and subacute phases of traumatic brain injury?

Emre Urhan, Gulsah Elbuken, Zuleyha Karaca, Kursad Unluhizarci, Mustafa Kula, Ahmed Selcuklu, Fahrettin Kelestimur
{"title":"Can salivary cortisol be used in diagnosing adrenal insufficiency during the acute and subacute phases of traumatic brain injury?","authors":"Emre Urhan, Gulsah Elbuken, Zuleyha Karaca, Kursad Unluhizarci, Mustafa Kula, Ahmed Selcuklu, Fahrettin Kelestimur","doi":"10.1055/a-2444-4386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a challenge. We investigated the basal and low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-stimulated serum cortisol and salivary cortisol (SaC) levels and the diagnostic utility of SaC levels during 28 days following TBI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected for basal levels [sequentially from day 1 (D1) to D7 and on D28)] and for peak serum cortisol and SaC responses to the low-dose ACTH stimulation test (on D1, D7, and D28). After the patient enrollment period was completed, patients were retrospectively categorized as AI or AS (adrenal sufficiency) for each day separately, based on a basal serum cortisol cut-off level of 11 µg/dL, and data analysis was performed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven patients and 40 healthy controls were included. Median basal serum cortisol levels were higher in patients on D1 but were similar on other days. Median basal SaC levels were higher in patients on D1 and D2 but were similar on other days. Median peak serum cortisol and SaC levels were similar on D1 but were lower in patients on D7 and D28. Median basal SaC levels were higher in the AS group than in the AI group on all days.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>When evaluating AI during the course of TBI, the cut-off for basal SaC levels is 0.5-0.6 µg/dL throughout the first week, except for 1.38 µg/dL on D2. SaC levels may serve as a surrogate marker for accurately reflecting circulating glucocorticoid activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94001,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2444-4386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a challenge. We investigated the basal and low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-stimulated serum cortisol and salivary cortisol (SaC) levels and the diagnostic utility of SaC levels during 28 days following TBI.

Materials and methods: Blood samples were collected for basal levels [sequentially from day 1 (D1) to D7 and on D28)] and for peak serum cortisol and SaC responses to the low-dose ACTH stimulation test (on D1, D7, and D28). After the patient enrollment period was completed, patients were retrospectively categorized as AI or AS (adrenal sufficiency) for each day separately, based on a basal serum cortisol cut-off level of 11 µg/dL, and data analysis was performed between the groups.

Results: Thirty-seven patients and 40 healthy controls were included. Median basal serum cortisol levels were higher in patients on D1 but were similar on other days. Median basal SaC levels were higher in patients on D1 and D2 but were similar on other days. Median peak serum cortisol and SaC levels were similar on D1 but were lower in patients on D7 and D28. Median basal SaC levels were higher in the AS group than in the AI group on all days.

Discussion and conclusions: When evaluating AI during the course of TBI, the cut-off for basal SaC levels is 0.5-0.6 µg/dL throughout the first week, except for 1.38 µg/dL on D2. SaC levels may serve as a surrogate marker for accurately reflecting circulating glucocorticoid activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液皮质醇能否用于诊断脑外伤急性期和亚急性期的肾上腺功能不全?
导言:与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)相关的肾上腺功能不全(AI)的诊断仍是一项挑战。我们研究了创伤性脑损伤后 28 天内的基础和低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)刺激血清皮质醇和唾液皮质醇(SaC)水平,以及 SaC 水平的诊断效用:采集血样以检测基础水平(从第 1 天(D1)至第 7 天(D7)和第 28 天(D28)依次采集)以及血清皮质醇和 SaC 对低剂量促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验的峰值反应(D1、D7 和 D28)。患者登记期结束后,根据基础血清皮质醇临界水平 11 µg/dL,每天分别对患者进行回顾性 AI 或 AS(肾上腺功能充足)分类,并在各组之间进行数据分析:结果:共纳入 37 名患者和 40 名健康对照组。患者在 D1 日的基础血清皮质醇水平中位数较高,但在其他日子的基础血清皮质醇水平中位数相近。在 D1 和 D2 日,患者的中位基础 SaC 水平较高,但在其他日子则相似。D1日患者的血清皮质醇和SaC峰值水平中位数相似,但D7和D28日患者的血清皮质醇和SaC峰值水平中位数较低。AS组的基础SaC水平中位数在所有日期都高于AI组:在评估创伤性脑损伤过程中的人工干预时,除了 D2 的 1.38 µg/dL 外,整个第一周基础 SaC 水平的临界值为 0.5-0.6 µg/dL。SaC 水平可作为替代指标,准确反映循环中糖皮质激素的活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel Treatment Options in Patients with Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young. The mechanism and treatment of cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: A review. 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Detected in Neonatal Screening: High Probability of False Negativity in Late Onset Form. Ocular motor mononeuropathies in diabetes mellitus: A brief review. Efficacy of Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Radiation-Induced Subclinical Hypothyroidism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1