Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record.

Dori A Cross, Josh Weiner, Andrew P J Olson
{"title":"Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record.","authors":"Dori A Cross, Josh Weiner, Andrew P J Olson","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attending physicians in academic hospitals work in supervisory team structures with medical residents to provide patient care. How attendings utilize the electronic health record (EHR) to support learning through supervision is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare EHR behavior on teaching versus direct care, including evidence of supervisory calibration to learners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study analysis of EHR metadata from 1721 shifts of hospital medicine faculty at a large, urban academic medical center, January to June 2022. Measures included total EHR time per shift, EHR time outside shift, and time spent on: note-writing, note review/attestation, order entry, and other clinical review. We assessed within physician differences across these service types and used multilevel modeling to determine whether these behaviors varied with resident physicians' experience, accounting for physician-specific signature behavior patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attendings spent substantially less time in the EHR while on teaching service than on direct service (129 vs. 240 min; p < .001) and apportioned their work differently throughout the day. Physicians were less behaviorally consistent and varied more than their peers when on teaching service. Attendings calibrated their supervision to learners. Attendings logged 12.7% less EHR time when paired with more senior residents than postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) residents (137 vs. 120 min, p = .002). PGY1 presence was also associated with reduced EHR time, suggesting some delegation of supervision to senior trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EHR behaviors on teaching service are highly variable and differ substantially from direct care; a lack of consistency suggests important opportunities to establish best practices for EHR-based supervision and create an effective clinical learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attending physicians in academic hospitals work in supervisory team structures with medical residents to provide patient care. How attendings utilize the electronic health record (EHR) to support learning through supervision is not well understood.

Objective: To compare EHR behavior on teaching versus direct care, including evidence of supervisory calibration to learners.

Methods: Cross-sectional study analysis of EHR metadata from 1721 shifts of hospital medicine faculty at a large, urban academic medical center, January to June 2022. Measures included total EHR time per shift, EHR time outside shift, and time spent on: note-writing, note review/attestation, order entry, and other clinical review. We assessed within physician differences across these service types and used multilevel modeling to determine whether these behaviors varied with resident physicians' experience, accounting for physician-specific signature behavior patterns.

Results: Attendings spent substantially less time in the EHR while on teaching service than on direct service (129 vs. 240 min; p < .001) and apportioned their work differently throughout the day. Physicians were less behaviorally consistent and varied more than their peers when on teaching service. Attendings calibrated their supervision to learners. Attendings logged 12.7% less EHR time when paired with more senior residents than postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) residents (137 vs. 120 min, p = .002). PGY1 presence was also associated with reduced EHR time, suggesting some delegation of supervision to senior trainees.

Conclusion: EHR behaviors on teaching service are highly variable and differ substantially from direct care; a lack of consistency suggests important opportunities to establish best practices for EHR-based supervision and create an effective clinical learning environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床学习环境中的数字化监督:电子健康记录中的团队合作特征。
背景:学术医院的主治医师与住院医师组成督导团队,为患者提供护理服务。人们对主治医师如何利用电子病历(EHR)通过督导支持学习还不甚了解:比较电子病历在教学和直接护理方面的行为,包括对学习者进行监督校准的证据:对一家大型城市学术医疗中心 2022 年 1 月至 6 月期间医院医学教员 1721 个班次的电子病历元数据进行横断面研究分析。测量指标包括每个班次的电子病历总时间、班次外的电子病历时间以及用于笔记书写、笔记审核/认证、医嘱输入和其他临床审核的时间。我们评估了医生内部在这些服务类型上的差异,并使用多层次模型来确定这些行为是否会随着住院医生经验的变化而变化,同时考虑到医生特有的签名行为模式:结果:主治医师在教学服务中使用电子病历的时间大大少于直接服务(129 分钟对 240 分钟;P 结论:在教学服务中使用电子病历的行为与直接服务中使用电子病历的行为不同:教学服务中的电子病历行为变化很大,与直接护理有很大不同;缺乏一致性表明,为基于电子病历的督导建立最佳实践和创造有效的临床学习环境提供了重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study. Guideline concordance of electronic health record order sets for hospital-based treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Methodological progress note: Purposeful sampling in qualitative research. Streamlining diuresis: A quality improvement approach to implementing a sodium-based predictive diuresis protocol. From rounds to retweets: A digital media fellowship perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1