CT-derived myocardial strain measurement in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis.

Han Na Lee, Junho Hyun, Sung Ho Jung, Jun Bum Kim, Jong En Lee, Dong Hyun Yang, Joon-Won Kang, Hyun Jung Koo
{"title":"CT-derived myocardial strain measurement in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis.","authors":"Han Na Lee, Junho Hyun, Sung Ho Jung, Jun Bum Kim, Jong En Lee, Dong Hyun Yang, Joon-Won Kang, Hyun Jung Koo","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to compare computed tomography (CT)-derived myocardial strain between patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP) and a matched healthy control group and to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes after pericardiectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 65 patients with CP (mean age: 58.9 ​± ​8.0 years) and 65 healthy individuals (mean age: 58.0 ​± ​6.5 years) who underwent multiphase cardiac CT. The type of CP was classified as calcified CP or fibrotic CP. CT-derived strains from four cardiac chambers were compared between the CP and control groups, as well as between different types of CP. Clinical and CT-derived factors associated with adverse outcomes were identified using Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, the CP group showed significantly lower values of left atrium (LA) reservoir strain (15.7 ​% vs. 27.4 ​%), right atrium (RA) reservoir strain (15.1 ​% vs. 27.0 ​%), left ventricle (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-17.0 ​% vs. -19.5 ​%), and right ventricle free wall longitudinal strain (-21.1 ​% vs. -25.9 ​%) (all p ​< ​0.001). Biatrial reservoir strains and LV GLS were significantly lower in those with calcified CP compared to those with fibrotic CP. LA reservoir strain (hazard ratio, 0.91-95 ​% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96- p ​= ​0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for adverse events in patients with CP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardiac strain differences in CP were predominantly observed in the LA and RA compared to the healthy control group. Biatrial reservoir strains were specifically impaired in those with calcified CP than in those with fibrotic CP. LA reservoir strain was associated with prognosis in patients with CP following pericardiectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare computed tomography (CT)-derived myocardial strain between patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP) and a matched healthy control group and to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes after pericardiectomy.

Methods: This retrospective study included 65 patients with CP (mean age: 58.9 ​± ​8.0 years) and 65 healthy individuals (mean age: 58.0 ​± ​6.5 years) who underwent multiphase cardiac CT. The type of CP was classified as calcified CP or fibrotic CP. CT-derived strains from four cardiac chambers were compared between the CP and control groups, as well as between different types of CP. Clinical and CT-derived factors associated with adverse outcomes were identified using Cox regression analysis.

Results: Compared with the control group, the CP group showed significantly lower values of left atrium (LA) reservoir strain (15.7 ​% vs. 27.4 ​%), right atrium (RA) reservoir strain (15.1 ​% vs. 27.0 ​%), left ventricle (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-17.0 ​% vs. -19.5 ​%), and right ventricle free wall longitudinal strain (-21.1 ​% vs. -25.9 ​%) (all p ​< ​0.001). Biatrial reservoir strains and LV GLS were significantly lower in those with calcified CP compared to those with fibrotic CP. LA reservoir strain (hazard ratio, 0.91-95 ​% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96- p ​= ​0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for adverse events in patients with CP.

Conclusion: Cardiac strain differences in CP were predominantly observed in the LA and RA compared to the healthy control group. Biatrial reservoir strains were specifically impaired in those with calcified CP than in those with fibrotic CP. LA reservoir strain was associated with prognosis in patients with CP following pericardiectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性缩窄性心包炎患者的 CT 心肌应变测量。
背景:我们旨在比较缩窄性心包炎(CP)患者与匹配的健康对照组之间计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的心肌应变,并确定与心包切除术后临床结果相关的因素:这项回顾性研究纳入了 65 名接受多相心脏 CT 检查的 CP 患者(平均年龄:58.9 ± 8.0 岁)和 65 名健康人(平均年龄:58.0 ± 6.5 岁)。CP 的类型分为钙化 CP 和纤维化 CP。比较了 CP 组和对照组之间以及不同类型 CP 之间来自四个心腔的 CT 导出应变。通过 Cox 回归分析确定了与不良后果相关的临床和 CT 衍生因素:与对照组相比,CP 组的左心房(LA)贮液器应变(15.7 % vs. 27.4 %)、右心房(RA)贮液器应变(15.1 % vs. 27.0 %)、左心室(LV)整体纵向应变(GLS)(-17.0 % vs. -19.5%)和右心室游离壁纵向应变(-21.1 % vs. -25.9%)的值均显著降低(均为 p与健康对照组相比,CP 的心脏应变差异主要体现在 LA 和 RA。与纤维化心肌梗死患者相比,钙化心肌梗死患者的心房储层应变明显受损。心包切除术后,LA 储层应变与 CP 患者的预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness of ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of stable chest pain. Association of coronary inflammation with plaque vulnerability and fractional flow reserve in coronary artery disease. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass measured on coronary computed tomography angiography. Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of significant left main coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1