ECHO-MPS, a dual modality strategy of cardiac imaging to identify myocardial ischemia.

Cezary A Szmigielski, Nikant Sabharwal, James D Newton, Harald Becher
{"title":"ECHO-MPS, a dual modality strategy of cardiac imaging to identify myocardial ischemia.","authors":"Cezary A Szmigielski, Nikant Sabharwal, James D Newton, Harald Becher","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03257-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate an approach with resting echocardiography (TTE) and stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) compared to standard MPS in patients with stable angina and normal left ventricle (LV). We hypothesized that normal LV on TTE may allow for the elimination of rest MPS without compromising accuracy and offering an efficient diagnostic pathway with reduced radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective, non-randomized study TTE was performed prior to MPS in patients (pts) referred for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). In pts with normal LV assessment was performed using the hybrid and the standard approach. TTE and MPS were interpreted by two TTE readers (ER1-2) and two MPS readers (NR1-2). ECHO-MPS was compared with standard MPS for diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 patients, mean age 61 ± 12 year, (63 M, 40 W) were recruited. Standard MPS were normal in 75 patients and abnormal in 28 patients, with the hybrid approach 79 studies were reported as normal and 24 studies as abnormal. Kappa values were 0.580, (p < 0.001) for large, 0.394, (p < 0.001) for medium, and 0.298 (p = 0.002) for small defects. With standard MPS as a reference, sensitivity for detection of perfusion defects by ECHO-MPS was 75% (95% CI 0.67-0.83) [NR2] and 78% (95% CI 0.70-0.86)[NR1]. Specificity was 95% (95% CI 0.90-0.99) [NR2] and 95% (CI 95%CI 0.90-0.99) [NR1].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECHO-MPS protocol provides similar diagnostic accuracy as standard stress-rest MPS. In patients with normal systolic LV function in TTE, performing only stress MPS provides similar information as standard rest and stress MPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2513-2521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03257-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate an approach with resting echocardiography (TTE) and stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) compared to standard MPS in patients with stable angina and normal left ventricle (LV). We hypothesized that normal LV on TTE may allow for the elimination of rest MPS without compromising accuracy and offering an efficient diagnostic pathway with reduced radiation exposure.

Methods: In a prospective, non-randomized study TTE was performed prior to MPS in patients (pts) referred for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). In pts with normal LV assessment was performed using the hybrid and the standard approach. TTE and MPS were interpreted by two TTE readers (ER1-2) and two MPS readers (NR1-2). ECHO-MPS was compared with standard MPS for diagnostic accuracy.

Results: 103 patients, mean age 61 ± 12 year, (63 M, 40 W) were recruited. Standard MPS were normal in 75 patients and abnormal in 28 patients, with the hybrid approach 79 studies were reported as normal and 24 studies as abnormal. Kappa values were 0.580, (p < 0.001) for large, 0.394, (p < 0.001) for medium, and 0.298 (p = 0.002) for small defects. With standard MPS as a reference, sensitivity for detection of perfusion defects by ECHO-MPS was 75% (95% CI 0.67-0.83) [NR2] and 78% (95% CI 0.70-0.86)[NR1]. Specificity was 95% (95% CI 0.90-0.99) [NR2] and 95% (CI 95%CI 0.90-0.99) [NR1].

Conclusions: ECHO-MPS protocol provides similar diagnostic accuracy as standard stress-rest MPS. In patients with normal systolic LV function in TTE, performing only stress MPS provides similar information as standard rest and stress MPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ECHO-MPS,一种识别心肌缺血的心脏成像双模式策略。
目的:我们的目的是评估在稳定型心绞痛和左心室(LV)正常的患者中采用静息超声心动图(TTE)和应激心肌灌注闪烁成像(MPS)与标准 MPS 相比的方法。我们推测,TTE检查左心室正常可省去静息MPS而不影响准确性,并提供一种减少辐射暴露的高效诊断途径:在一项前瞻性、非随机研究中,对转诊评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者(pts)在MPS前进行TTE检查。对于左心室正常的患者,采用混合和标准方法进行评估。TTE 和 MPS 分别由两名 TTE 阅读器(ER1-2)和两名 MPS 阅读器(NR1-2)判读。就诊断准确性而言,ECHO-MPS 与标准 MPS 进行了比较:共招募了 103 名患者,平均年龄为 61 ± 12 岁,其中 63 名男性,40 名女性。标准 MPS 有 75 例正常,28 例异常;混合方法有 79 例正常,24 例异常。Kappa 值为 0.580,(P 结论:ECHO-MPS 方案与标准 MPS 相似:ECHO-MPS方案的诊断准确性与标准压力-静息MPS相似。对于 TTE 中左心室收缩功能正常的患者,仅进行应激 MPS 可提供与标准静息和应激 MPS 相似的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1