Associations of PFASs and Pesticides with Lung Function Changes from Adolescence to Young Adulthood in the ESPINA study.

Kayleigh Kornher, Carlos F Gould, Jomel Meeko Manzano, Katie Baines, Georgia Kayser, Xin Tu, Jose Suarez-Torres, Danilo Martinez, Jose R Suarez-Lopez
{"title":"Associations of PFASs and Pesticides with Lung Function Changes from Adolescence to Young Adulthood in the ESPINA study.","authors":"Kayleigh Kornher, Carlos F Gould, Jomel Meeko Manzano, Katie Baines, Georgia Kayser, Xin Tu, Jose Suarez-Torres, Danilo Martinez, Jose R Suarez-Lopez","doi":"10.1101/2024.10.09.24315189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and pesticides are ubiquitous environmental exposures with increasingly recognized adverse health outcomes; however, their impact on lung function, particularly in combination, remains poorly understood. We included 381 adolescent participants from a prospective cohort study in Ecuador who underwent measurements of serum PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS] and perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA]) and urinary herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4D) and fungicides (ethylene thiourea) and had spirometric measurements in either 2016 or 2022. We characterized the association between each PFAS or pesticide and each lung function measure in log-log models estimated via ordinary least squares regression. We used quantile g-computation to assess the association of the mixture of PFAS and pesticides with lung function outcomes. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and in models adjusting for household income, parental education, and exposure to tobacco, we found that, individually, PFOA, glyphosate, and ETU were associated with slight increases in FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC between 2016 and 2022. No other individual associations were significant. In mixtures analyses, a one quartile increase in all PFASs and pesticides simultaneously was also not associated with statistically significant changes in lung function outcomes after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. In large part, we do not provide evidence for associations of PFAS and herbicide and fungicide pesticides with lung function among adolescents in moderate-to-high-altitude agricultural communities in Ecuador.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.24315189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and pesticides are ubiquitous environmental exposures with increasingly recognized adverse health outcomes; however, their impact on lung function, particularly in combination, remains poorly understood. We included 381 adolescent participants from a prospective cohort study in Ecuador who underwent measurements of serum PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS] and perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA]) and urinary herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4D) and fungicides (ethylene thiourea) and had spirometric measurements in either 2016 or 2022. We characterized the association between each PFAS or pesticide and each lung function measure in log-log models estimated via ordinary least squares regression. We used quantile g-computation to assess the association of the mixture of PFAS and pesticides with lung function outcomes. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and in models adjusting for household income, parental education, and exposure to tobacco, we found that, individually, PFOA, glyphosate, and ETU were associated with slight increases in FEV1/FVC between 2016 and 2022. No other individual associations were significant. In mixtures analyses, a one quartile increase in all PFASs and pesticides simultaneously was also not associated with statistically significant changes in lung function outcomes after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. In large part, we do not provide evidence for associations of PFAS and herbicide and fungicide pesticides with lung function among adolescents in moderate-to-high-altitude agricultural communities in Ecuador.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESPINA研究中全氟辛烷磺酸和杀虫剂与青春期至成年期肺功能变化的关系。
全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)和杀虫剂是无处不在的环境接触物,其对健康的不良影响日益得到认可;然而,人们对它们对肺功能的影响,尤其是结合使用时的影响,仍然知之甚少。我们从厄瓜多尔的一项前瞻性队列研究中纳入了 381 名青少年参与者,他们在 2016 年或 2022 年接受了血清 PFAS(全氟辛酸 [PFOA]、全氟辛烷磺酸 [PFOS] 和全氟壬酸 [PFNA])和尿液除草剂(草甘膦、2,4D)及杀菌剂(乙烯硫脲)的测量,并进行了肺活量测量。我们在通过普通最小二乘法回归估算的对数模型中描述了每种全氟辛烷磺酸或杀虫剂与每种肺功能指标之间的关联。我们使用量化 g 计算方法来评估 PFAS 和农药混合物与肺功能结果之间的关联。在考虑了多重假设检验,并对家庭收入、父母教育程度和烟草暴露进行调整后,我们发现,在 2016 年至 2022 年期间,PFOA、草甘膦和 ETU 单独与 FEV 1 /FVC 的轻微增加有关。其他单项关联均不显著。在混合物分析中,在考虑多重假设检验后,所有全氟辛烷磺酸和杀虫剂同时增加一个四分位数也与肺功能结果的统计学显著变化无关。在很大程度上,我们没有提供证据证明厄瓜多尔中高纬度农业社区青少年的肺功能与全氟辛烷磺酸、除草剂和杀真菌剂农药有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioids Diminish the Placebo Antidepressant Response: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Ketamine Trial. Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon. Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults from Preoperative Cognition and Occipital Alpha Power from Resting-State Electroencephalogram. Reduced Cortical Excitability is Associated with Cognitive Symptoms in Concussed Adolescent Football Players. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor BHLHE22 monoallelic and biallelic variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with agenesis of the corpus callosum, intellectual disability, tone and movement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1