Determining the effectiveness of a virtual service /patient-based education program on patient care and clinical decision-making in nursing: A quasi-experimental study.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2024.78095
Taner Onay, Mehmet Ali Gulpinar, Merve Saracoglu, Esra Akdeniz
{"title":"Determining the effectiveness of a virtual service /patient-based education program on patient care and clinical decision-making in nursing: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Taner Onay, Mehmet Ali Gulpinar, Merve Saracoglu, Esra Akdeniz","doi":"10.14744/nci.2024.78095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a virtual service/patient-based program (vSPBP) developed for nursing education and its effect on the development of care plan preparation and clinical decision-making skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a quasi-experimental design with a sample of fourth-year nursing students. Participants were assigned to the intervention group (n=44) and control group (n=51). The intervention group participated in a full-day vSPBP in addition to clinical training, whereas the control group received only the clinical training. Both groups were evaluated at the end of the intervention for care planning skills and at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic year for clinical decision-making skills. The Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (mSET) and focused group interview were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the vSPBP; nursing students' Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDM-NS) and Care Plan Evaluation Form were used to evaluate learning outcomes. Quantitative data were analyzed using the t-test and ANOVA. Qualitative data were analyzed by three researchers, and themes were identified. Ethical permissions were obtained from the relevant units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total score of the Turkish Version of the mSET was 84.39±12.08 (51-95) and the education program was found to be highly effective. The mean care plan preparation skills scores of the intervention and control groups were 44.84±2.77 and 27.75±4.28 (0-50), respectively, and the total scores of the CDM-NS (at the last measurement) were 147.90±11.28 and 146.42±12.21. While there was a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the ability to prepare a care plan (p=0.001), there was no difference between the groups in clinical decision-making skills over time (p=0.433), between the second and third measurements over time (p>0.05), but both measurements increased significantly compared with the first measurement (p=0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vSPBP was determined to be an effective learning activity for the development of care plan preparation and clinical reasoning skills, as well as effective in closing the gap between theoretical and clinical knowledge and adaptation to the nursing process when applied in an integrated manner with the existing nursing program.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 5","pages":"422-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2024.78095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a virtual service/patient-based program (vSPBP) developed for nursing education and its effect on the development of care plan preparation and clinical decision-making skills.

Methods: The study was conducted in a quasi-experimental design with a sample of fourth-year nursing students. Participants were assigned to the intervention group (n=44) and control group (n=51). The intervention group participated in a full-day vSPBP in addition to clinical training, whereas the control group received only the clinical training. Both groups were evaluated at the end of the intervention for care planning skills and at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic year for clinical decision-making skills. The Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (mSET) and focused group interview were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the vSPBP; nursing students' Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDM-NS) and Care Plan Evaluation Form were used to evaluate learning outcomes. Quantitative data were analyzed using the t-test and ANOVA. Qualitative data were analyzed by three researchers, and themes were identified. Ethical permissions were obtained from the relevant units.

Results: The total score of the Turkish Version of the mSET was 84.39±12.08 (51-95) and the education program was found to be highly effective. The mean care plan preparation skills scores of the intervention and control groups were 44.84±2.77 and 27.75±4.28 (0-50), respectively, and the total scores of the CDM-NS (at the last measurement) were 147.90±11.28 and 146.42±12.21. While there was a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the ability to prepare a care plan (p=0.001), there was no difference between the groups in clinical decision-making skills over time (p=0.433), between the second and third measurements over time (p>0.05), but both measurements increased significantly compared with the first measurement (p=0.000).

Conclusion: The vSPBP was determined to be an effective learning activity for the development of care plan preparation and clinical reasoning skills, as well as effective in closing the gap between theoretical and clinical knowledge and adaptation to the nursing process when applied in an integrated manner with the existing nursing program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定虚拟服务/以病人为基础的教育计划对病人护理和护理临床决策的有效性:准实验研究。
研究目的本研究旨在确定为护理教育开发的虚拟服务/基于患者的程序(vSPBP)的有效性,以及其对护理计划准备和临床决策技能发展的影响:研究采用准实验设计,以护理专业四年级学生为样本。参与者被分配到干预组(44 人)和对照组(51 人)。干预组除临床培训外,还参加了全天的 vSPBP,而对照组只接受临床培训。在干预结束时对两组的护理计划技能进行评估,在学年初、学年中和学年末对两组的临床决策技能进行评估。改良模拟效果工具(mSET)和焦点小组访谈用于评估 vSPBP 的效果;护理学生的护理临床决策量表(CDM-NS)和护理计划评估表用于评估学习成果。定量数据采用 t 检验和方差分析。定性数据由三名研究人员进行分析,并确定主题。结果:土耳其版 mSET 的总得分为 84.39±12.08(51-95)分,教育计划被认为非常有效。干预组和对照组的护理计划准备技能平均分分别为(44.84±2.77)分和(27.75±4.28)分(0-50)分,CDM-NS(最后一次测量)总分分别为(147.90±11.28)分和(146.42±12.21)分。虽然干预组和对照组在制定护理计划的能力上有显著差异(P=0.001),但随着时间的推移,两组在临床决策能力上没有差异(P=0.433),第二次和第三次测量结果也没有差异(P>0.05),但与第一次测量结果相比,两次测量结果都有显著提高(P=0.000):vSPBP被认为是培养护理计划准备和临床推理能力的有效学习活动,在与现有护理课程整合应用时,还能有效缩小理论与临床知识之间的差距,适应护理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can HALP (Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score distinguish malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic cholestasis in patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction? Do we know about dynapenia? Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye. Investigation of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in patients who had Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Contact Lesions with Real-time PCR method in serum, tissue, and saliva samples. Vena cava and renal vein thrombosis with pheochromocytoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1