The importance of quantitative evaluation of constipation in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2023.59827
Tarik Emre Sener, Dogancan Dorucu, Sebahat Cam
{"title":"The importance of quantitative evaluation of constipation in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction.","authors":"Tarik Emre Sener, Dogancan Dorucu, Sebahat Cam","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.59827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a known association between lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and constipation. The objective of this study was to investigate any correlation between voiding and bowel symptoms in children with LUTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children presenting with LUTD to our pediatric urology unit were prospectively included. Demographic data were recorded. All patients filled out the \"Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score\" (P-LUTSS) and \"Constipation and Fecal Incontinence Symptom Severity\" (CFISS) questionnaires. Symptom score correlation and associations with clinical findings were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 patients were included. The mean P-LUTSS was 11±7.1; mean CFISS was 7.7±7.5. According to P-LUTSS risk groups, median CFISS score increased as the risk group was increased. There was direct correlation between P-LUTSS and CFISS for all patients. 6<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup>, 8<sup>th</sup>, 9<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> questions of P-LUTSS were correlated with CFISS; the 1<sup>st</sup> and 7<sup>th</sup> questions of CFISS were correlated with P-LUTSS. Patients who responded not to have constipation on P-LUTSS had lower CFISS scores compared to those who had constipation. Patients who had a 0 score on CFISS had a mean P-LUTSS of 7.7±6.2, which put the majority of patients in low-risk group. Also, out of these 11 patients, 10 of them responded to have no constipation on P-LUTSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A relationship between LUTD and bowel symptoms, as well as the positive correlation between P-LUTSS and CFISS was demonstrated in this study. Patients presenting with LUTD should undergo meticulous evaluation using special questionnaires for bowel symptoms. Only by then, a complete treatment approach can be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 5","pages":"373-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.59827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is a known association between lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and constipation. The objective of this study was to investigate any correlation between voiding and bowel symptoms in children with LUTD.

Methods: Children presenting with LUTD to our pediatric urology unit were prospectively included. Demographic data were recorded. All patients filled out the "Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score" (P-LUTSS) and "Constipation and Fecal Incontinence Symptom Severity" (CFISS) questionnaires. Symptom score correlation and associations with clinical findings were evaluated.

Results: 76 patients were included. The mean P-LUTSS was 11±7.1; mean CFISS was 7.7±7.5. According to P-LUTSS risk groups, median CFISS score increased as the risk group was increased. There was direct correlation between P-LUTSS and CFISS for all patients. 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 13th questions of P-LUTSS were correlated with CFISS; the 1st and 7th questions of CFISS were correlated with P-LUTSS. Patients who responded not to have constipation on P-LUTSS had lower CFISS scores compared to those who had constipation. Patients who had a 0 score on CFISS had a mean P-LUTSS of 7.7±6.2, which put the majority of patients in low-risk group. Also, out of these 11 patients, 10 of them responded to have no constipation on P-LUTSS.

Conclusion: A relationship between LUTD and bowel symptoms, as well as the positive correlation between P-LUTSS and CFISS was demonstrated in this study. Patients presenting with LUTD should undergo meticulous evaluation using special questionnaires for bowel symptoms. Only by then, a complete treatment approach can be provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对患有下尿路功能障碍的儿童进行便秘定量评估的重要性。
目的:众所周知,下尿路功能障碍(LUTD)与便秘之间存在关联。本研究旨在调查下尿路功能障碍患儿的排尿和排便症状之间是否存在关联:方法:前瞻性地纳入在本院儿科泌尿科就诊的 LUTD 患儿。记录人口统计学数据。所有患者都填写了 "小儿下尿路症状评分"(P-LUTSS)和 "便秘和大便失禁症状严重程度"(CFISS)问卷。评估了症状评分与临床结果的相关性和关联性:共纳入 76 名患者。平均 P-LUTSS 为 11±7.1;平均 CFISS 为 7.7±7.5。根据 P-LUTSS 风险组别,CFISS 中位数得分随着风险组别的增加而增加。所有患者的 P-LUTSS 和 CFISS 之间存在直接相关性。P-LUTSS的第6、7、8、9、10和13个问题与CFISS相关;CFISS的第1和7个问题与P-LUTSS相关。与有便秘的患者相比,对 P-LUTSS 回答无便秘的患者的 CFISS 分数较低。CFISS 得分为 0 的患者的 P-LUTSS 平均值为 7.7±6.2,因此大多数患者属于低风险组。此外,在这 11 名患者中,有 10 人在 P-LUTSS 评分中没有便秘症状:本研究证实了 LUTD 与肠道症状之间的关系,以及 P-LUTSS 与 CFISS 之间的正相关性。LUTD 患者应使用专门的肠道症状问卷进行细致评估。只有这样,才能提供完整的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can HALP (Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score distinguish malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic cholestasis in patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction? Do we know about dynapenia? Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye. Investigation of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in patients who had Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Contact Lesions with Real-time PCR method in serum, tissue, and saliva samples. Vena cava and renal vein thrombosis with pheochromocytoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1