Bacterial profile of wound site infections and evaluation of risk factors for sepsis among road traffic accident patients from Apex Trauma Centre, Northern India.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000836.v4
Aparna Singh, Sangram Singh Patel, Chinmoy Sahu, Amit Kumar Singh, Nidhi Tejan, Gerlin Varghese, Ashima Jamwal, Pooja Singh, Malay Ghar
{"title":"Bacterial profile of wound site infections and evaluation of risk factors for sepsis among road traffic accident patients from Apex Trauma Centre, Northern India.","authors":"Aparna Singh, Sangram Singh Patel, Chinmoy Sahu, Amit Kumar Singh, Nidhi Tejan, Gerlin Varghese, Ashima Jamwal, Pooja Singh, Malay Ghar","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000836.v4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Among the most significant yet often ignored health issues worldwide are trauma and accidental injuries. India accounts for 11% of global deaths in road accidents, the highest in the world, according to the World Bank report. There are limited data about the bacterial contamination of road traffic accident (RTA) wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. <b>Materials and Methods.</b> This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre in northern India from January 2023 to January 2024. Wound deep swabs or aspirates were collected from RTA patients with traumatic injuries at different time intervals. Gram stain and culture were performed, and positive aerobic culture was subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. Organism identification was done using MALDI-TOF MS and routine biochemical tests. Blood samples were also collected to rule out bloodstream infections during follow-up if the patient became febrile or showed symptoms of systemic infection. Sepsis was defined in those patients who had two or more scores in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria with a positive microbiological culture. Risk factors were evaluated for sepsis on the basis of the patient's vitals, injury characteristics, procalcitonin, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, need for mechanical ventilation and complete blood count, which were obtained from the patient's admission file. <b>Results.</b> A total of 189 wound samples were collected, of which 99 (52.38%) samples showed the growth of microorganisms. The aerobic isolates included 69 (69.69%) Gram-negative bacilli, of which the majority were <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, 28 (28.28%) Gram-positive cocci, of which the majority were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and 2 (2.02%) anaerobic isolates. Among the Gram-negative isolates, none of the isolates were resistant to colistin. All <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and levonadifloxacin. Sepsis developed in 50 (26.45 %) patients. Significant risk factors evaluated for sepsis were a raised procalcitonin level, a low GCS score, a higher injury severity score, the need for mechanical ventilation and a raised quick sequential organ failure assessment score. <b>Conclusion.</b> It is essential to ascertain the profile of microorganisms isolated from RTA wounds in order to reduce antibiotic resistance and deliver efficient treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000836.v4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Among the most significant yet often ignored health issues worldwide are trauma and accidental injuries. India accounts for 11% of global deaths in road accidents, the highest in the world, according to the World Bank report. There are limited data about the bacterial contamination of road traffic accident (RTA) wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Materials and Methods. This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care centre in northern India from January 2023 to January 2024. Wound deep swabs or aspirates were collected from RTA patients with traumatic injuries at different time intervals. Gram stain and culture were performed, and positive aerobic culture was subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. Organism identification was done using MALDI-TOF MS and routine biochemical tests. Blood samples were also collected to rule out bloodstream infections during follow-up if the patient became febrile or showed symptoms of systemic infection. Sepsis was defined in those patients who had two or more scores in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria with a positive microbiological culture. Risk factors were evaluated for sepsis on the basis of the patient's vitals, injury characteristics, procalcitonin, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, need for mechanical ventilation and complete blood count, which were obtained from the patient's admission file. Results. A total of 189 wound samples were collected, of which 99 (52.38%) samples showed the growth of microorganisms. The aerobic isolates included 69 (69.69%) Gram-negative bacilli, of which the majority were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 28 (28.28%) Gram-positive cocci, of which the majority were Staphylococcus aureus and 2 (2.02%) anaerobic isolates. Among the Gram-negative isolates, none of the isolates were resistant to colistin. All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and levonadifloxacin. Sepsis developed in 50 (26.45 %) patients. Significant risk factors evaluated for sepsis were a raised procalcitonin level, a low GCS score, a higher injury severity score, the need for mechanical ventilation and a raised quick sequential organ failure assessment score. Conclusion. It is essential to ascertain the profile of microorganisms isolated from RTA wounds in order to reduce antibiotic resistance and deliver efficient treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度北部 Apex 外伤中心道路交通事故患者伤口感染的细菌概况及败血症风险因素评估。
背景。创伤和意外伤害是全球最重要的健康问题之一,但却常常被忽视。根据世界银行的报告,印度占全球道路交通事故死亡人数的 11%,居世界首位。有关道路交通事故(RTA)伤口细菌污染及其抗生素敏感性模式的数据十分有限。材料和方法。这项前瞻性研究于 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月在印度北部的一家三级医疗中心进行。研究人员在不同时间间隔从外伤的 RTA 患者身上采集伤口深部拭子或抽吸物。进行革兰氏染色和培养,对阳性需氧培养物进行抗生素药敏试验。使用 MALDI-TOF MS 和常规生化检验进行微生物鉴定。在随访期间,如果患者出现发热或全身感染症状,也会采集血样以排除血流感染。全身炎症反应综合征标准中有两项或两项以上评分且微生物培养呈阳性的患者被定义为败血症。根据患者的生命体征、损伤特征、降钙素原、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、机械通气需求和全血细胞计数评估败血症的风险因素,这些信息均来自患者的入院档案。结果共采集了 189 个伤口样本,其中 99 个样本(52.38%)显示有微生物生长。需氧菌分离物包括 69 个(69.69%)革兰氏阴性杆菌,其中大部分是肺炎克雷伯氏菌;28 个(28.28%)革兰氏阳性球菌,其中大部分是金黄色葡萄球菌;2 个(2.02%)厌氧菌分离物。在革兰氏阴性分离株中,没有一个对可乐定产生耐药性。所有分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌均对万古霉素、替考拉宁和左氧氟沙星敏感。50名患者(26.45%)出现败血症。脓毒症的重要风险因素包括降钙素原水平升高、GCS评分较低、损伤严重程度评分较高、需要机械通气以及快速器官功能衰竭评估评分升高。结论必须确定从 RTA 伤口中分离出的微生物的特征,以减少抗生素耐药性并提供有效治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii lung mono-challenge models in mice using oropharyngeal aspiration. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Blantyre, Malawi. Whole genome sequencing assisted outbreak investigation of Salmonella enteritidis, at a hospital in South Africa, September 2022. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between neglected tropical diseases and malnutrition: more research needed on diseases other than intestinal parasites, leishmaniasis and leprosy. Cell division cycle fluctuation of Pal concentration in Escherichia coli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1