Radiographic Analysis of Scoliosis Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Practice.

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2023.0111
Ha Yun Oh, Tae Kun Kim, Yun Sun Choi, Mira Park, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Jin Kyung An
{"title":"Radiographic Analysis of Scoliosis Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Ha Yun Oh, Tae Kun Kim, Yun Sun Choi, Mira Park, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Jin Kyung An","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2023.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reliability and accuracy of an automated Cobb angle measurement (ACAM) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for scoliosis evaluation and to compare measurement times.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ACAM was applied to spine radiographs in 411 patients suspected of scoliosis. Observer 1 (consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists) and observer 2 (a radiology resident) measured Cobb angle (CA). CA measurements were categorized using observer 1's measurements as the reference standard. Inter-observer reliability and correlation were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, respectively. Accuracy and measurement time of ACAM and observers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACAM demonstrated excellent reliability and very high correlation with observer 1 (ICC = 0.976, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.948), with a mean CA difference of 1.1. Overall accuracy was high (88.2%), particularly in mild (92.2%) and moderate (96%) scoliosis. Accuracy was lower in spinal asymmetry (77.1%) and higher in severe scoliosis (95%), although the CA was lower compared to the observers. ACAM significantly reduced measurement time by nearly half compared to the observers (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACAM using CNN enhances CA measurement for assessing mild or moderate scoliosis, despite limitations in spinal asymmetry or severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, it substantially decreases measurement time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"85 5","pages":"926-936"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reliability and accuracy of an automated Cobb angle measurement (ACAM) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for scoliosis evaluation and to compare measurement times.

Materials and methods: ACAM was applied to spine radiographs in 411 patients suspected of scoliosis. Observer 1 (consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists) and observer 2 (a radiology resident) measured Cobb angle (CA). CA measurements were categorized using observer 1's measurements as the reference standard. Inter-observer reliability and correlation were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, respectively. Accuracy and measurement time of ACAM and observers were evaluated.

Results: ACAM demonstrated excellent reliability and very high correlation with observer 1 (ICC = 0.976, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.948), with a mean CA difference of 1.1. Overall accuracy was high (88.2%), particularly in mild (92.2%) and moderate (96%) scoliosis. Accuracy was lower in spinal asymmetry (77.1%) and higher in severe scoliosis (95%), although the CA was lower compared to the observers. ACAM significantly reduced measurement time by nearly half compared to the observers (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: ACAM using CNN enhances CA measurement for assessing mild or moderate scoliosis, despite limitations in spinal asymmetry or severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, it substantially decreases measurement time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床实践中使用卷积神经网络对脊柱侧凸进行放射学分析
目的:评估使用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行脊柱侧弯评估的自动Cobb角测量(ACAM)的可靠性和准确性,并比较测量时间:将 ACAM 应用于 411 名脊柱侧弯疑似患者的脊柱 X 光片。观察者 1(两名肌肉骨骼放射科医师的共识)和观察者 2(一名放射科住院医师)测量了 Cobb 角 (CA)。以观察者 1 的测量结果为参考标准,对 CA 测量结果进行分类。观察者之间的可靠性和相关性分别使用类内相关系数(ICC)和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数进行评估。对 ACAM 和观察者的准确性和测量时间进行了评估:ACAM 的可靠性极佳,与观察者 1 的相关性极高(ICC = 0.976,Spearman秩相关系数 = 0.948),平均 CA 差值为 1.1。总体准确率很高(88.2%),尤其是轻度(92.2%)和中度(96%)脊柱侧弯。脊柱不对称的准确率较低(77.1%),而重度脊柱侧凸的准确率较高(95%),但与观察者相比,CA 值较低。与观察者相比,ACAM 大大减少了近一半的测量时间(p < 0.001):结论:使用 CNN 的 ACAM 增强了评估轻度或中度脊柱侧凸的 CA 测量,尽管在脊柱不对称或严重脊柱侧凸方面存在局限性。结论:使用 CNN 的 ACAM 在评估轻度或中度脊柱侧弯时可增强 CA 测量效果,但在脊柱不对称或重度脊柱侧弯方面存在局限性,而且还能大幅缩短测量时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Announcement of the Establishment of the 'Healthcare Policy' Section and Introduction of the New Section Editor]. [Annual Report of J Korean Soc Radiol in the 80th Korean Congress of Radiology, 2024]. [Medical Radiation Safety: Are We Doing It Right?] [Preface for Special Issue on Medical Policy and Radiology]. [Rules Regarding Special Medical Equipment and Exclusively Affiliated Radiologists in Korea].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1