Discrepancies in CDE and Measured Phaco Tip Energy: Comparison of Energy Produced in Longitudinal and Torsional Ultrasound Using Calorimetry.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S484843
Reiker G Ricks, Ivan A Cardenas, Jenna L Jensen, Tanner K Nelson, Randall J Olson, Jeff H Pettey
{"title":"Discrepancies in CDE and Measured Phaco Tip Energy: Comparison of Energy Produced in Longitudinal and Torsional Ultrasound Using Calorimetry.","authors":"Reiker G Ricks, Ivan A Cardenas, Jenna L Jensen, Tanner K Nelson, Randall J Olson, Jeff H Pettey","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S484843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the differences between the heat energy produced during cataract surgery and Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE). CDE is often used as a medium for understanding the energy delivered to the eye during cataract surgery. However, the actual energy produced at the tip level of the tip is not well understood. We propose that a discrepancy may exist between the CDE reported by the surgical machine and the actual energy delivered to the eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>About 50 mL of distilled water were degassed and placed in an isobaric calorimeter. Using the Alcon Centurion and Ozil handpiece fitted with the balanced tip, an investigator immersed the phaco tip into the water and pressed the foot pedal to position 3. The device was set to 100% continuous power, vacuum to 0 mmHg, with aspiration 12 mL/min aspiration. To prevent system changes in the system within the calorimeter, the aspiration tubing was occluded. Temperature change recorded by another investigator was observed from 0 to 60 seconds. After 60 seconds the first researcher immediately released the pedal and removed the phaco tip from the water. Trials were performed 10 times using solely torsional or longitudinal settings and averaged. CDE also was recorded and averaged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in the temperature change or energy calculated in Joules between ultrasound modalities, with torsional producing a magnitude of 163 J and longitudinal producing 172 J (P = 0.2). However, the CDE generated in the 60 seconds period was significantly different, with a magnitude of 61 for longitudinal compared to 24 for torsional (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significantly more energy was generated using torsional ultrasound than longitudinal at the tip level of the tip. CDE did not appear to accurately reflect these differences. This suggests that other factors should be considered when evaluating CDE and surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"339-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S484843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences between the heat energy produced during cataract surgery and Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE). CDE is often used as a medium for understanding the energy delivered to the eye during cataract surgery. However, the actual energy produced at the tip level of the tip is not well understood. We propose that a discrepancy may exist between the CDE reported by the surgical machine and the actual energy delivered to the eye.

Methods: About 50 mL of distilled water were degassed and placed in an isobaric calorimeter. Using the Alcon Centurion and Ozil handpiece fitted with the balanced tip, an investigator immersed the phaco tip into the water and pressed the foot pedal to position 3. The device was set to 100% continuous power, vacuum to 0 mmHg, with aspiration 12 mL/min aspiration. To prevent system changes in the system within the calorimeter, the aspiration tubing was occluded. Temperature change recorded by another investigator was observed from 0 to 60 seconds. After 60 seconds the first researcher immediately released the pedal and removed the phaco tip from the water. Trials were performed 10 times using solely torsional or longitudinal settings and averaged. CDE also was recorded and averaged.

Results: No significant difference was seen in the temperature change or energy calculated in Joules between ultrasound modalities, with torsional producing a magnitude of 163 J and longitudinal producing 172 J (P = 0.2). However, the CDE generated in the 60 seconds period was significantly different, with a magnitude of 61 for longitudinal compared to 24 for torsional (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Significantly more energy was generated using torsional ultrasound than longitudinal at the tip level of the tip. CDE did not appear to accurately reflect these differences. This suggests that other factors should be considered when evaluating CDE and surgical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CDE 与测量的 Phaco 刀尖能量之间的差异:使用量热法比较纵向和扭转超声波产生的能量。
目的:本研究旨在调查白内障手术过程中产生的热能与累积耗散能量(CDE)之间的差异。CDE 通常被用作了解白内障手术过程中输送到眼球的能量的媒介。然而,人们对针尖水平产生的实际能量却不甚了解。我们认为,手术机器报告的 CDE 与实际输送到眼球的能量之间可能存在差异:方法:将约 50 毫升蒸馏水脱气后放入等压量热计。研究人员使用装有平衡刀头的 Alcon Centurion 和 Ozil 手机,将 phaco 刀头浸入水中,然后将脚踏板踩到位置 3。设备设置为 100% 持续功率,真空度为 0 mmHg,吸液速度为 12 mL/min。为防止热量计内的系统发生变化,吸液管被堵塞。另一名研究人员记录的温度变化时间为 0 至 60 秒。60 秒后,第一位研究人员立即松开踏板,并从水中移除 phaco 尖端。仅使用扭转或纵向设置进行 10 次测试并取平均值。同时记录 CDE 并取平均值:结果:不同超声模式的温度变化或以焦耳为单位计算的能量没有明显差异,扭转模式产生的能量为 163 焦耳,纵向模式产生的能量为 172 焦耳(P = 0.2)。然而,60 秒内产生的 CDE 有显著差异,纵向产生 61 焦耳,而扭转产生 24 焦耳(P < 0.001):结论:在尖端水平,扭转超声波产生的能量明显多于纵向超声波。CDE 似乎不能准确反映这些差异。这表明在评估 CDE 和手术结果时还应考虑其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Initial Validation of the NOL Nociception Level Index® Monitoring System in Black and Multiracial People. Potential of Aluminum Drug Packages with Press-Through Packaging Considering Usability for a Wide Range of Users. The Application Effect of Fine Management Combined with Man-Machine Fixation Mode in Reducing the Attrition Rate of Laparoscopic Instruments-A Non-Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Study. Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections. May Glymphatic Drainage Improve Life Quality in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Outpatients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1