Does sedentary behaviour cause spinal pain in children and adolescents? A systematic review with meta-analysis

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES British Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108648
Laura R C Montgomery, Michael Swain, Amabile B Dario, Mary O'Keeffe, Tie P Yamato, Jan Hartvigsen, Simon French, Christopher Williams, Steve Kamper
{"title":"Does sedentary behaviour cause spinal pain in children and adolescents? A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"Laura R C Montgomery, Michael Swain, Amabile B Dario, Mary O'Keeffe, Tie P Yamato, Jan Hartvigsen, Simon French, Christopher Williams, Steve Kamper","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate whether sedentary behaviour is a risk or prognostic factor for spinal pain in children and adolescents. Specifically, to estimate the (1) direction and strength of the association; (2) risk of spinal pain onset and (3) effect on spinal pain prognosis. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources Electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 23 March 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Reports estimating the effect of sedentary behaviour on spinal pain in young people (≤19 years). Results We included 129 reports, 14 were longitudinal (n = 8 433) and 115 were cross-sectional (n > 697 590). We incorporated 86 studies into meta-analyses. (1) From cross-sectional data, we found low certainty evidence of a small positive association between sedentary behaviour and spinal pain (adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.33), k = 44, n > 92 617). (2) From longitudinal data, we found low certainty evidence of no increased risk for the onset of spinal pain due to sedentary behaviour (adjusted risk ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.35), k = 4, n = 1 292). (3) No studies assessed prognosis. Conclusion Cross-sectional data suggest minimally higher odds of spinal pain for children and adolescents who engage in greater sedentary behaviours. However, longitudinal data do not support a causal relationship, indicating that sedentary behaviour does not increase the risk for onset of spinal pain. Due to the low certainty of evidence, these findings must be interpreted with caution. We found no evidence of the effect sedentary behaviour has on spinal pain prognosis in children and adolescents, highlighting a considerable gap in the literature. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether sedentary behaviour is a risk or prognostic factor for spinal pain in children and adolescents. Specifically, to estimate the (1) direction and strength of the association; (2) risk of spinal pain onset and (3) effect on spinal pain prognosis. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources Electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 23 March 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Reports estimating the effect of sedentary behaviour on spinal pain in young people (≤19 years). Results We included 129 reports, 14 were longitudinal (n = 8 433) and 115 were cross-sectional (n > 697 590). We incorporated 86 studies into meta-analyses. (1) From cross-sectional data, we found low certainty evidence of a small positive association between sedentary behaviour and spinal pain (adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.33), k = 44, n > 92 617). (2) From longitudinal data, we found low certainty evidence of no increased risk for the onset of spinal pain due to sedentary behaviour (adjusted risk ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.35), k = 4, n = 1 292). (3) No studies assessed prognosis. Conclusion Cross-sectional data suggest minimally higher odds of spinal pain for children and adolescents who engage in greater sedentary behaviours. However, longitudinal data do not support a causal relationship, indicating that sedentary behaviour does not increase the risk for onset of spinal pain. Due to the low certainty of evidence, these findings must be interpreted with caution. We found no evidence of the effect sedentary behaviour has on spinal pain prognosis in children and adolescents, highlighting a considerable gap in the literature. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
久坐会导致儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛吗?系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的 评估久坐是否是儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛的风险或预后因素。具体来说,评估(1)相关性的方向和强度;(2)脊柱疼痛的发病风险和(3)对脊柱疼痛预后的影响。设计 系统回顾与荟萃分析。数据来源 对截至 2023 年 3 月 23 日的 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 进行电子检索。选择研究的资格标准 报告估计了久坐行为对年轻人(19 岁以下)脊柱疼痛的影响。结果 我们纳入了 129 篇报告,其中 14 篇为纵向研究(n = 8 433),115 篇为横截面研究(n > 697 590)。我们将 86 项研究纳入荟萃分析。(1)从横断面数据中,我们发现了久坐行为与脊柱疼痛之间存在微小正相关关系的低确定性证据(调整后的几率比1.25(95% CI 1.17至1.33),k = 44,n > 92 617)。(2)从纵向数据中,我们发现低确定性证据表明,久坐行为不会增加脊柱疼痛的发病风险(调整风险比 1.07(95% CI 0.84 至 1.35),k = 4,n = 1 292)。(3) 没有研究对预后进行评估。结论 横断面数据表明,久坐行为较多的儿童和青少年出现脊柱疼痛的几率略高。然而,纵向数据并不支持这种因果关系,表明久坐行为并不会增加脊柱疼痛的发病风险。由于证据的确定性较低,必须谨慎解释这些发现。我们没有发现久坐行为对儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛预后影响的证据,这凸显了文献中的巨大空白。与该研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为在线补充信息上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
期刊最新文献
Refining the recipe or spoiling the broth? Reframing perceptions of programme adaptation in sports injury prevention Elevating the games: the future of the Olympics and Paralympics at higher altitudes Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community-based longitudinal study Physical activity and life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1