Elucidating Protein Structures in the Gas Phase: Traversing Configuration Space with Biasing Methods

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00288
Viraj D. Gandhi, Leyan Hua, Morgan Lawrenz, Mohsen Latif, Amber D. Rolland, Iain D. G. Campuzano, Carlos Larriba-Andaluz
{"title":"Elucidating Protein Structures in the Gas Phase: Traversing Configuration Space with Biasing Methods","authors":"Viraj D. Gandhi, Leyan Hua, Morgan Lawrenz, Mohsen Latif, Amber D. Rolland, Iain D. G. Campuzano, Carlos Larriba-Andaluz","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving accurate characterization of protein structures in the gas phase continues to be a formidable challenge. To tackle this issue, the present study employs Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations in tandem with enhanced sampling techniques (methods designed to efficiently explore protein conformations). The objective is to identify suitable structures of proteins by contrasting their calculated Collision Cross-Section (CCS) with those observed experimentally. Significant discrepancies were observed between the initial MD-simulated and experimentally measured CCS values through Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). To bridge this gap, we employed two distinct enhanced sampling methods, Harmonic Biasing Potential and Adaptive Biasing Force, which help the proteins overcome energy barriers to adopt more compact configurations. These techniques leverage the radius of gyration as a reaction coordinate (guiding parameter), guiding the system toward compressed states that potentially match experimental configurations more closely. The guiding forces are only employed to overcome existing barriers and are removed to allow the protein to naturally arrive at a potential gas phase configuration. The results demonstrated close alignment (within ∼4%) between simulated and experimental CCS values despite using different strengths and/or methods, validating their efficacy. This work lays the groundwork for future studies aimed at optimizing biasing methods and expanding the collective variables used for more accurate gas-phase structural predictions.","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving accurate characterization of protein structures in the gas phase continues to be a formidable challenge. To tackle this issue, the present study employs Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations in tandem with enhanced sampling techniques (methods designed to efficiently explore protein conformations). The objective is to identify suitable structures of proteins by contrasting their calculated Collision Cross-Section (CCS) with those observed experimentally. Significant discrepancies were observed between the initial MD-simulated and experimentally measured CCS values through Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). To bridge this gap, we employed two distinct enhanced sampling methods, Harmonic Biasing Potential and Adaptive Biasing Force, which help the proteins overcome energy barriers to adopt more compact configurations. These techniques leverage the radius of gyration as a reaction coordinate (guiding parameter), guiding the system toward compressed states that potentially match experimental configurations more closely. The guiding forces are only employed to overcome existing barriers and are removed to allow the protein to naturally arrive at a potential gas phase configuration. The results demonstrated close alignment (within ∼4%) between simulated and experimental CCS values despite using different strengths and/or methods, validating their efficacy. This work lays the groundwork for future studies aimed at optimizing biasing methods and expanding the collective variables used for more accurate gas-phase structural predictions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阐明气相中的蛋白质结构:用偏置方法穿越构型空间
准确描述气相中的蛋白质结构仍然是一项艰巨的挑战。为解决这一问题,本研究采用分子动力学(MD)模拟与增强采样技术(旨在有效探索蛋白质构象的方法)相结合的方法。目的是通过对比计算出的碰撞截面(CCS)和实验观察到的碰撞截面,确定合适的蛋白质结构。通过离子迁移质谱法(IMS-MS),我们发现最初的 MD 模拟值与实验测量的 CCS 值之间存在显著差异。为了弥补这一差距,我们采用了两种不同的增强采样方法,即谐波偏置势能和自适应偏置力,它们可以帮助蛋白质克服能量障碍,采用更紧凑的构型。这些技术利用回旋半径作为反应坐标(引导参数),引导系统进入压缩状态,从而可能与实验构型更加匹配。引导力仅用于克服现有障碍,并在蛋白质自然到达潜在气相构型时被移除。结果表明,尽管使用了不同的强度和/或方法,模拟和实验的 CCS 值还是非常接近(在 ∼4% 以内),验证了它们的有效性。这项工作为今后的研究奠定了基础,这些研究旨在优化偏置方法,扩大用于更准确气相结构预测的集体变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
期刊最新文献
Electron-Spin Relaxation in Boron-Doped Graphene Nanoribbons. Does the Traditional Band Picture Correctly Describe the Electronic Structure of n-Doped Conjugated Polymers? A TD-DFT and Natural Transition Orbital Study. Determining the N-Representability of a Reduced Density Matrix via Unitary Evolution and Stochastic Sampling. Host-Guest Binding Free Energies à la Carte: An Automated OneOPES Protocol. How Sophisticated Are Neural Networks Needed to Predict Long-Term Nonadiabatic Dynamics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1