Clinical consequences of development of resistance to third generation cephalosporins.

F Follath, E Costa, A Thommen, R Frei, A Burdeska, J Meyer
{"title":"Clinical consequences of development of resistance to third generation cephalosporins.","authors":"F Follath,&nbsp;E Costa,&nbsp;A Thommen,&nbsp;R Frei,&nbsp;A Burdeska,&nbsp;J Meyer","doi":"10.1007/BF02013108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eighteen patients are described in whom initially sensitive microorganisms were replaced by resistant isolates during administration of ceftriaxone (n = 8), cefoperazone (n = 5), moxalactam (n = 4), cefotaxime (n = 2) or ceftazidime (n = 1), despite combination with aminoglycosides. All patients had documented gram-negative infections; in 12 patients underlying haematological diseases were present. Resistant strains of Enterobacter cloacae (14), Serratia marcescens (4), Klebsiella oxytoca (3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2) and Citrobacter freundii (2) emerged within 2 to 19 (mean 9) days after the beginning of treatment. In 12 patients relapse or secondary infections occurred. Seven of the patients with haematological disorders died. Resistance development was seen in 8 of 29 patients on ceftriaxone and 4 of 10 patients on moxalactam during prospective evaluations; the other drugs were used sporadically. Thus, selection of resistant bacteria is relatively frequent and may have serious clinical consequences in patients with impaired host-defense mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11958,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02013108","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Eighteen patients are described in whom initially sensitive microorganisms were replaced by resistant isolates during administration of ceftriaxone (n = 8), cefoperazone (n = 5), moxalactam (n = 4), cefotaxime (n = 2) or ceftazidime (n = 1), despite combination with aminoglycosides. All patients had documented gram-negative infections; in 12 patients underlying haematological diseases were present. Resistant strains of Enterobacter cloacae (14), Serratia marcescens (4), Klebsiella oxytoca (3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2) and Citrobacter freundii (2) emerged within 2 to 19 (mean 9) days after the beginning of treatment. In 12 patients relapse or secondary infections occurred. Seven of the patients with haematological disorders died. Resistance development was seen in 8 of 29 patients on ceftriaxone and 4 of 10 patients on moxalactam during prospective evaluations; the other drugs were used sporadically. Thus, selection of resistant bacteria is relatively frequent and may have serious clinical consequences in patients with impaired host-defense mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三代头孢菌素耐药性发展的临床后果。
18例患者在使用头孢曲松(n = 8)、头孢哌酮(n = 5)、莫拉西坦(n = 4)、头孢噻肟(n = 2)或头孢他啶(n = 1)期间,尽管与氨基糖苷类药物联合使用,但最初敏感的微生物被耐药菌株所取代。所有患者均有革兰氏阴性感染记录;12例患者存在潜在的血液系统疾病。在开始治疗后的2 ~ 19天(平均9天)内出现了耐药菌株:阴沟肠杆菌(14株)、粘质沙雷菌(4株)、氧化克雷伯菌(3株)、铜绿假单胞菌(2株)和弗伦地柠檬酸杆菌(2株)。12例患者出现复发或继发感染。7名患有血液病的患者死亡。在前瞻性评估中,使用头孢曲松的29例患者中有8例出现耐药性,使用莫拉西坦的10例患者中有4例出现耐药性;其他药物是偶尔使用的。因此,耐药菌的选择相对频繁,并可能对宿主防御机制受损的患者产生严重的临床后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modulation of human neutrophil and monocyte oxidative burst by Legionella pneumophila sonic extract. Evaluation of three methods for typing herpes simplex virus. Comparative activity of LY146032 against anaerobic cocci. Comparative in vitro activity of the new peptolide antibiotic LY146032 against staphylococci. LY146032 treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in hamsters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1