Can satellite products monitor solar brightening in Europe?

IF 11.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Remote Sensing of Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114472
Ruben Urraca , Jörg Trentmann , Uwe Pfeifroth , Nadine Gobron
{"title":"Can satellite products monitor solar brightening in Europe?","authors":"Ruben Urraca ,&nbsp;Jörg Trentmann ,&nbsp;Uwe Pfeifroth ,&nbsp;Nadine Gobron","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2024.114472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Satellite products provide the best way to monitor the solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface on a global scale. However, their capability to monitor solar radiation trends needs to be constantly evaluated. This depends on their temporal stability and the accurate representation of all processes driving solar radiation. This study evaluates these aspects by comparing and cross-comparing different solar radiation products (ERA5, CAMS-RAD 4.6, SARAH-3, CLARA-A3, CERES-EBAF 4.2) against in-situ measurements over Europe.</div><div>All products show a moderate positive bias over Europe but strong differences in their root mean squared deviation (RMSD) related to their different cloud transmittance models. Geostationary-based products (SARAH-3, CAMS-RAD 4.6) provide the smallest RMSD closely followed by CLARA-A3, whereas ERA5 shows a large RMSD due to random errors in cloud transmittance.</div><div>All products show an increase in surface solar radiation, or brightening, over the last 40 years over Europe, but the magnitude of the trends and their spatiotemporal variability differ between products. Despite finding temporal inhomogeneities in some products, the different trends are mostly due to different aerosol modeling approaches implemented by each product. Both SARAH-3 (+2.3 <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>W/m</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>decade</mi></mrow></math></span>, 2001–22) and CERES-EBAF 4.2 (+2.2 <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>W/m</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>decade</mi></mrow></math></span>, 2001–22) provide the most consistent trends compared to in-situ data, showing that after stabilizing in the late 2000s, brightening is particularly recovering in Western Europe. In-situ measurements show a reduction of aerosol optical depth from 2001 to 2022 that has been accentuated in the last 10 years, particularly in Western Europe. This would be consistent with the hypothesis that brightening recovery is driven by an aerosol reduction, though other analyses suggest that clouds also play a role in this recovery. More work is needed to understand the contribution of aerosols to solar radiation trends and the exact aerosol effects represented by each solar radiation product.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 114472"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003442572400498X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satellite products provide the best way to monitor the solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface on a global scale. However, their capability to monitor solar radiation trends needs to be constantly evaluated. This depends on their temporal stability and the accurate representation of all processes driving solar radiation. This study evaluates these aspects by comparing and cross-comparing different solar radiation products (ERA5, CAMS-RAD 4.6, SARAH-3, CLARA-A3, CERES-EBAF 4.2) against in-situ measurements over Europe.
All products show a moderate positive bias over Europe but strong differences in their root mean squared deviation (RMSD) related to their different cloud transmittance models. Geostationary-based products (SARAH-3, CAMS-RAD 4.6) provide the smallest RMSD closely followed by CLARA-A3, whereas ERA5 shows a large RMSD due to random errors in cloud transmittance.
All products show an increase in surface solar radiation, or brightening, over the last 40 years over Europe, but the magnitude of the trends and their spatiotemporal variability differ between products. Despite finding temporal inhomogeneities in some products, the different trends are mostly due to different aerosol modeling approaches implemented by each product. Both SARAH-3 (+2.3 W/m2/decade, 2001–22) and CERES-EBAF 4.2 (+2.2 W/m2/decade, 2001–22) provide the most consistent trends compared to in-situ data, showing that after stabilizing in the late 2000s, brightening is particularly recovering in Western Europe. In-situ measurements show a reduction of aerosol optical depth from 2001 to 2022 that has been accentuated in the last 10 years, particularly in Western Europe. This would be consistent with the hypothesis that brightening recovery is driven by an aerosol reduction, though other analyses suggest that clouds also play a role in this recovery. More work is needed to understand the contribution of aerosols to solar radiation trends and the exact aerosol effects represented by each solar radiation product.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫星产品能否监测欧洲的太阳亮度?
卫星产品为监测全球范围内到达地球表面的太阳辐射提供了最佳途径。然而,它们监测太阳辐射趋势的能力需要不断评估。这取决于卫星产品的时间稳定性和对太阳辐射所有驱动过程的准确呈现。本研究通过将不同的太阳辐射产品(ERA5、CAMS-RAD 4.6、SARAH-3、CLARA-A3、CERES-EBAF 4.2)与欧洲上空的实地测量数据进行比较和交叉比较,对这些方面进行了评估。基于地球静止轨道的产品(SARAH-3、CAMS-RAD 4.6)提供的均方根偏差最小,紧随其后的是 CLARA-A3,而 ERA5 则由于云层透射率的随机误差而显示出较大的均方根偏差。尽管在一些产品中发现了时间上的不均匀性,但不同的趋势主要是由于每个产品采用的气溶胶建模方法不同造成的。SARAH-3(+2.3 W/m2/decadeW/m2/decade,2001-22 年)和 CERES-EBAF 4.2(+2.2 W/m2/decadeW/m2/decade,2001-22 年)都提供了与原地数据最一致的趋势,表明在 2000 年代后期趋于稳定之后,西欧的增亮正在恢复。原位测量结果表明,从 2001 年到 2022 年,气溶胶光学深度有所下降,而在过去 10 年中,这种下降趋势更加明显,尤其是在西欧。这与亮度恢复是由气溶胶减少驱动的假设是一致的,尽管其他分析表明云也在亮度恢复中发挥了作用。要了解气溶胶对太阳辐射趋势的贡献以及每种太阳辐射产品所代表的气溶胶效应,还需要做更多的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
期刊最新文献
Two-decade surface ozone (O3) pollution in China: Enhanced fine-scale estimations and environmental health implications Assessing lead fraction derived from passive microwave images and improving estimates at pixel-wise level Estimating anthropogenic CO2 emissions from China's Yangtze River Delta using OCO-2 observations and WRF-Chem simulations A dual-branch network for crop-type mapping of scattered small agricultural fields in time series remote sensing images From theory to hydrological practice: Leveraging CYGNSS data over seven years for advanced soil moisture monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1