Data Quality in State Registry Reports of Medical Cannabis Patients in the United States.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.2105/ajph.2024.307728
Kevin F Boehnke,Rachel Sinclair,Felicia Gordon,Douglas R Roehler,Tristin Smith,Brooke Hoots
{"title":"Data Quality in State Registry Reports of Medical Cannabis Patients in the United States.","authors":"Kevin F Boehnke,Rachel Sinclair,Felicia Gordon,Douglas R Roehler,Tristin Smith,Brooke Hoots","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2024.307728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. To investigate characteristics of data reported in US medical cannabis registries across states. Methods. Data included 2021 medical cannabis registry reports from 34 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (hereafter, states) with active medical cannabis programs. The data from the reports were manually coded into domains and subcategories, including information related to patients (e.g., number, demographics), authorizing clinicians, sales (e.g., content, revenue), license tracking, and health and safety outcomes. Results. Among 36 states, 97% reported total patient number and 75% reported number of authorizing clinicians. Least reported subcategories included patient race/ethnicity (8%), adverse events (11%), therapeutic benefits (6%), and product recalls (6%). States that recently legalized medical cannabis (2013-2018) reported a higher number of subcategories overall, with a median of 11 versus 8 for early adopting states (1996-2012). More medical-use states reported data on authorizing clinicians compared with nonmedical adult-use states but were otherwise similar. Conclusions. Medical cannabis state registries generally reported data on consumers, clinicians, and sales rather than health and safety outcomes. More comprehensive and uniform medical cannabis public health surveillance is needed. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S8):S685-S693. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307728).","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"S685-S693"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2024.307728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate characteristics of data reported in US medical cannabis registries across states. Methods. Data included 2021 medical cannabis registry reports from 34 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (hereafter, states) with active medical cannabis programs. The data from the reports were manually coded into domains and subcategories, including information related to patients (e.g., number, demographics), authorizing clinicians, sales (e.g., content, revenue), license tracking, and health and safety outcomes. Results. Among 36 states, 97% reported total patient number and 75% reported number of authorizing clinicians. Least reported subcategories included patient race/ethnicity (8%), adverse events (11%), therapeutic benefits (6%), and product recalls (6%). States that recently legalized medical cannabis (2013-2018) reported a higher number of subcategories overall, with a median of 11 versus 8 for early adopting states (1996-2012). More medical-use states reported data on authorizing clinicians compared with nonmedical adult-use states but were otherwise similar. Conclusions. Medical cannabis state registries generally reported data on consumers, clinicians, and sales rather than health and safety outcomes. More comprehensive and uniform medical cannabis public health surveillance is needed. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S8):S685-S693. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307728).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国各州医用大麻患者登记报告的数据质量。
目的。调查美国各州医用大麻登记处报告数据的特征。方法。数据包括来自 34 个州、波多黎各和哥伦比亚特区(以下简称 "各州")的 2021 份医用大麻登记报告,这些州都有活跃的医用大麻计划。报告中的数据经人工编码后分为领域和子类,包括与患者(如人数、人口统计学特征)、授权临床医生、销售(如内容、收入)、许可证跟踪以及健康和安全结果相关的信息。结果。在 36 个州中,97% 的州报告了患者总人数,75% 的州报告了授权临床医生人数。报告最少的子类别包括患者种族/族裔(8%)、不良事件(11%)、治疗效果(6%)和产品召回(6%)。最近(2013-2018 年)实现医用大麻合法化的州报告的子类别数量总体较多,中位数为 11 个,而早期采用医用大麻的州(1996-2012 年)报告的子类别数量为 8 个。与非医用大麻州相比,医用大麻州报告的授权临床医生数据更多,但其他方面类似。结论。医用大麻州登记处一般报告的是消费者、临床医生和销售数据,而不是健康和安全结果。需要对医用大麻进行更全面、更统一的公共卫生监测。(Am J Public Health.2024;114(S8):S685-S693. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307728).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Health Disparities and Sexual Orientation Response Choices Used in Two US National Population-Based Health Surveys, 2020‒2021. Bridging the Gap: Aligning Education for Public Health With Emerging Workforce Demands. Mastheads. Subscription Form. Table of Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1