Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia

Patrick T Donahue, Aparna Balasubramanian, Qian-Li Xue, Jennifer A Schrack, Michelle C Carlson
{"title":"Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia","authors":"Patrick T Donahue, Aparna Balasubramanian, Qian-Li Xue, Jennifer A Schrack, Michelle C Carlson","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Impaired respiratory function, measured via peak expiratory flow (PEF), has been associated with increased dementia risk. However, much of the current literature uses cross-sectional measures of PEF, whereas longitudinal relationships between changes in respiratory function and dementia risk are underexplored. Methods Using 10 years of data (2011-2021) from 2,439 adults ages 65 and older in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we examined whether 5-year changes in PEF (2011-2016) were associated with risk for incident dementia over the subsequent 5-year period (2017-2021). PEF slopes for each participant were estimated using linear mixed-effects models and then grouped into quartiles: rapid, moderate, mild, and no declines. Discrete-time Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk for incident dementia by PEF slope category, while controlling for several health and sociodemographic characteristics. Results After excluding dementia cases during the exposure window (2011-2016), we identified 338 cases of incident dementia (13.9%) between 2017-2021. Rapid PEF declines between 2011-2016 were associated with 85% higher risk for incident dementia between 2017-2021 compared to those with no declines in PEF (HR=1.85; 95% CI [1.24, 2.76]). Results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that declines in PEF may precede declines in cognition, suggesting that respiratory function may be an important dementia risk factor in older adults. Additionally, these findings highlight the utility of measuring PEF via a peak flow meter, which is a simple and inexpensive measure of respiratory function.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Impaired respiratory function, measured via peak expiratory flow (PEF), has been associated with increased dementia risk. However, much of the current literature uses cross-sectional measures of PEF, whereas longitudinal relationships between changes in respiratory function and dementia risk are underexplored. Methods Using 10 years of data (2011-2021) from 2,439 adults ages 65 and older in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we examined whether 5-year changes in PEF (2011-2016) were associated with risk for incident dementia over the subsequent 5-year period (2017-2021). PEF slopes for each participant were estimated using linear mixed-effects models and then grouped into quartiles: rapid, moderate, mild, and no declines. Discrete-time Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk for incident dementia by PEF slope category, while controlling for several health and sociodemographic characteristics. Results After excluding dementia cases during the exposure window (2011-2016), we identified 338 cases of incident dementia (13.9%) between 2017-2021. Rapid PEF declines between 2011-2016 were associated with 85% higher risk for incident dementia between 2017-2021 compared to those with no declines in PEF (HR=1.85; 95% CI [1.24, 2.76]). Results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that declines in PEF may precede declines in cognition, suggesting that respiratory function may be an important dementia risk factor in older adults. Additionally, these findings highlight the utility of measuring PEF via a peak flow meter, which is a simple and inexpensive measure of respiratory function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
峰值呼气流量的纵向变化可预测痴呆症的发病风险
背景 通过呼气峰流速(PEF)测量的呼吸功能受损与痴呆风险增加有关。然而,目前大部分文献使用的都是横断面的呼气峰值流量测量方法,而对呼吸功能变化与痴呆症风险之间的纵向关系却缺乏深入研究。方法 我们利用全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)中 2439 名 65 岁及以上成年人的 10 年数据(2011-2021 年),研究了 PEF 的 5 年变化(2011-2016 年)是否与随后 5 年(2017-2021 年)的痴呆症发病风险相关。我们使用线性混合效应模型估算了每位参与者的 PEF 斜率,然后将其分为四等分:快速下降、中度下降、轻度下降和无下降。离散时间 Cox 比例危险模型用于估算按 PEF 斜率类别划分的痴呆症发病风险,同时控制若干健康和社会人口特征。结果 在排除了暴露窗口期(2011-2016 年)的痴呆病例后,我们发现在 2017-2021 年间有 338 例痴呆病例(13.9%)。与 PEF 没有下降的病例相比,2011-2016 年间 PEF 快速下降与 2017-2021 年间发生痴呆症的风险增加 85% 相关(HR=1.85;95% CI [1.24,2.76])。几项敏感性分析的结果都很可靠。结论 这些研究结果表明,PEF 的下降可能先于认知能力的下降,这表明呼吸功能可能是老年人痴呆症的一个重要风险因素。此外,这些研究结果还强调了通过峰值流量计测量 PEF 的实用性,因为这是一种简单而廉价的呼吸功能测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does sleep moderate the effects of exercise training or complex mental and social activities on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke? Secondary analysis of a randomized trial The influence of body mass index on biomarkers of cellular senescence in older adults Late-onset caloric restriction improves cognitive performance and restores circadian patterns of neurotrophic, clock and epigenetic factors in the hippocampus of male old rats Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia Association between TTV viremia, chronic inflammation, and ischemic heart disease risk: Insights from MARK-AGE and Report-Age projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1