Mary Carol Burkhardt,Landon Krantz,Rachel B Herbst,Jennifer Hardie,Samuel Eggers,Tracy Huentelman,Allison Reyner,Cynthia White,William B Brinkman
{"title":"Increasing Follow-up for Adolescents With Depressive Symptoms.","authors":"Mary Carol Burkhardt,Landon Krantz,Rachel B Herbst,Jennifer Hardie,Samuel Eggers,Tracy Huentelman,Allison Reyner,Cynthia White,William B Brinkman","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPrompt follow-up for positive depression screen results is important in providing high-quality care for adolescents. We sought to improve follow-up within 30 days for adolescents (≥12 years) with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ≥10, or those with a positive question 9, from 25% to 40%.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a quality improvement project at 6 primary care locations serving ∼33,300 patients (70% Black, 7.3% Hispanic, 80% Medicaid-enrolled). Our team identified key drivers and iteratively tested interventions, including contacting patients after antidepressant medication initiation, scheduling patients for follow-up during index visits, collaborating with integrated psychologists to expedite therapy for higher-risk patients, and reaching out to patients without scheduled follow-ups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPre-intervention, 13.3% (589 of 4427) of adolescent encounters met the criteria for follow-up within 30 days, and 25.8% had a documented follow-up within 30 days. During the intervention period, 12.3% (764 of 6224) of adolescent encounters met the criteria for follow-up within 30 days, and the mean follow-up rate increased to 43.1%. By monitoring process measures, we scheduled follow-up visits for 18.9% of patients during the index encounter. Outreach to the remainder led to 32.6% of these patients completing follow-up. Our balancing measure of monitoring integrated psychology visit volumes remained stable.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe application of quality improvement methods in primary care practices increased the frequency of follow-up care for high-risk adolescents after a positive depression screen.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Prompt follow-up for positive depression screen results is important in providing high-quality care for adolescents. We sought to improve follow-up within 30 days for adolescents (≥12 years) with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ≥10, or those with a positive question 9, from 25% to 40%.
METHODS
We conducted a quality improvement project at 6 primary care locations serving ∼33,300 patients (70% Black, 7.3% Hispanic, 80% Medicaid-enrolled). Our team identified key drivers and iteratively tested interventions, including contacting patients after antidepressant medication initiation, scheduling patients for follow-up during index visits, collaborating with integrated psychologists to expedite therapy for higher-risk patients, and reaching out to patients without scheduled follow-ups.
RESULTS
Pre-intervention, 13.3% (589 of 4427) of adolescent encounters met the criteria for follow-up within 30 days, and 25.8% had a documented follow-up within 30 days. During the intervention period, 12.3% (764 of 6224) of adolescent encounters met the criteria for follow-up within 30 days, and the mean follow-up rate increased to 43.1%. By monitoring process measures, we scheduled follow-up visits for 18.9% of patients during the index encounter. Outreach to the remainder led to 32.6% of these patients completing follow-up. Our balancing measure of monitoring integrated psychology visit volumes remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS
The application of quality improvement methods in primary care practices increased the frequency of follow-up care for high-risk adolescents after a positive depression screen.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.