Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae517
Andre C Kalil, Aastha Chandak, Luke S P Moore, Neera Ahuja, Martin Kolditz, Roman Casciano, Ananth Kadambi, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Sotirios Tsiodras, Jakob J Malin, Essy Mozaffari, Michele Bartoletti
{"title":"Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19","authors":"Andre C Kalil, Aastha Chandak, Luke S P Moore, Neera Ahuja, Martin Kolditz, Roman Casciano, Ananth Kadambi, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Sotirios Tsiodras, Jakob J Malin, Essy Mozaffari, Michele Bartoletti","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background As COVID-19-related mortality remains a concern, optimal management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 continues to evolve. We developed a population model based on real-world evidence to quantify the clinical impact of increased utilization of remdesivir, the effectiveness of which has been well established in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods The PINC AI healthcare database records for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2023 were stratified by those treated with or without remdesivir (“RDV” and “No RDV”) and by supplemental oxygen requirements: no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc), low-flow oxygen (LFO), and high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (HFO/NIV). Key vulnerable subgroups such as elderly and immunocompromised patients were also evaluated. The model applied previously published hazard ratios (HRs) to 28-day in-hospital mortality incidence to determine the number of potential lives saved if additional “No RDV” patients had been treated with remdesivir upon hospital admission. Results Of 84,810 hospitalizations for COVID-19 in 2023, 13,233 “No RDV” patients were similar in terms of characteristics and clinical presentation to the “RDV” patients. The model predicted that initiation of remdesivir in these patients could have saved 231 lives. Projected nationally, this translates to >800 potential lives saved (95% CI: 469-1,126). Eighty-nine percent of potential lives saved were elderly and 19% were immunocompromised individuals. Seventy-one percent were among NSOc or LFO patients. Conclusions This public health model underscores the value of initiating remdesivir upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in accordance with evidence-based best practices, to minimize lives lost due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background As COVID-19-related mortality remains a concern, optimal management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 continues to evolve. We developed a population model based on real-world evidence to quantify the clinical impact of increased utilization of remdesivir, the effectiveness of which has been well established in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods The PINC AI healthcare database records for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2023 were stratified by those treated with or without remdesivir (“RDV” and “No RDV”) and by supplemental oxygen requirements: no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc), low-flow oxygen (LFO), and high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (HFO/NIV). Key vulnerable subgroups such as elderly and immunocompromised patients were also evaluated. The model applied previously published hazard ratios (HRs) to 28-day in-hospital mortality incidence to determine the number of potential lives saved if additional “No RDV” patients had been treated with remdesivir upon hospital admission. Results Of 84,810 hospitalizations for COVID-19 in 2023, 13,233 “No RDV” patients were similar in terms of characteristics and clinical presentation to the “RDV” patients. The model predicted that initiation of remdesivir in these patients could have saved 231 lives. Projected nationally, this translates to >800 potential lives saved (95% CI: 469-1,126). Eighty-nine percent of potential lives saved were elderly and 19% were immunocompromised individuals. Seventy-one percent were among NSOc or LFO patients. Conclusions This public health model underscores the value of initiating remdesivir upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in accordance with evidence-based best practices, to minimize lives lost due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用循证最佳实践管理 COVID-19 住院患者的公共卫生效益
背景 由于 COVID-19 相关死亡率仍是一个令人担忧的问题,因此对 COVID-19 住院患者的最佳管理仍在不断发展。我们根据现实世界的证据建立了一个人群模型,以量化增加使用雷米替韦的临床影响,雷米替韦对 COVID-19 住院患者的有效性已得到充分证实。方法 将 2023 年 1 月至 12 月期间因 COVID-19 住院患者的 PINC AI 医疗数据库记录按使用或未使用雷米替韦治疗("RDV "和 "无 RDV")以及补充氧需求进行分层:无补充氧费用 (NSOc)、低流量吸氧 (LFO) 和高流量吸氧/无创通气 (HFO/NIV)。此外,还对老年人和免疫力低下患者等主要易感亚组进行了评估。该模型将之前公布的危险比(HRs)应用于 28 天院内死亡率,以确定如果更多 "无 RDV "患者在入院时接受雷米替韦治疗,可能挽救的生命数量。结果 在2023年因COVID-19住院的84810例患者中,有13233例 "无RDV "患者的特征和临床表现与 "RDV "患者相似。根据模型预测,对这些患者使用雷米替韦可挽救 231 条生命。在全国范围内推算,这相当于>800个潜在挽救的生命(95% CI:469-1,126)。在可能挽救的生命中,89% 是老年人,19% 是免疫力低下者。71%为非传染性疾病或低氧血症患者。结论 这一公共卫生模式强调了根据循证最佳实践在 COVID-19 住院患者入院时开始使用雷米替韦的价值,以最大限度地减少因感染 SARS-CoV-2 而导致的生命损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/European Respiratory Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA) Updated guideline on the treatment of tuberculosis. Correction to: State-of-the-Art Review: Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Implant Infections. The importance of antibiofilm antibiotics in hardware-associated infections. A Biosocial Roadmap to Tackle the Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infections That Ensures Health Equity for All. Addressing Spinal Implant Infections: Emerging Options and Unresolved Challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1