Gaze and hand behaviors during haptic abilities testing—An update to multimedia learning theory

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1002/ase.2526
Michelle A. Sveistrup, Jean Langlois, Timothy D. Wilson
{"title":"Gaze and hand behaviors during haptic abilities testing—An update to multimedia learning theory","authors":"Michelle A. Sveistrup,&nbsp;Jean Langlois,&nbsp;Timothy D. Wilson","doi":"10.1002/ase.2526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) suggests humans learn through visual and auditory sensory channels. Haptics represent a third channel within CTML and a missing component for experiential learning. The objective was to measure visual and haptic behaviors during spatial tasks. The haptic abilities test (HAT) quantifies results in several realms, accuracy, time, and strategy. The HAT was completed under three sensory conditions using sight (S), haptics (H), and sight with haptics (SH). Subjects (<i>n</i> = 22, 13 females (F), 20–28 years) completed the MRT (10.6 ± 5.0, mean ± <i>SD</i>) and were classified as high or low spatial abilities scores with respect to mean MRT: high spatial abilities (HSA) (<i>n</i> = 12, 6F, MRT = 13.7 ± 3.0), and low spatial ability (LSA) groups (<i>n</i> = 10, 7F, MRT = 5.6 ± 2.0). Video recordings gaze and hand behaviors were compared between HSA and LSA groups across HAT conditions. The HSA group spent less time fixating on mirrored objects, an erroneous answer option, of HAT compared to the LSA group (11.0 ± 4.7 vs. 17.8 ± 7.3 s, <i>p</i> = 0.020) in S conditions. In haptic conditions, HSA utilized a hand–object interaction strategy characterized as palpation, significantly less than the LSA group (23.2 ± 16.0 vs. 43.1 ± 21.5 percent, <i>p</i> = 0.022). Before this study, it was unclear whether haptic sensory inputs appended to the mental schema models of the CTML. These data suggest that if spatial abilities are challenged, LSA persons both benefit and utilize strategies beyond the classic CTML framework by using their hands as a third input channel. This data suggest haptic behaviors offer a third type of sensory memory resulting in improved cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"32-47"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) suggests humans learn through visual and auditory sensory channels. Haptics represent a third channel within CTML and a missing component for experiential learning. The objective was to measure visual and haptic behaviors during spatial tasks. The haptic abilities test (HAT) quantifies results in several realms, accuracy, time, and strategy. The HAT was completed under three sensory conditions using sight (S), haptics (H), and sight with haptics (SH). Subjects (n = 22, 13 females (F), 20–28 years) completed the MRT (10.6 ± 5.0, mean ± SD) and were classified as high or low spatial abilities scores with respect to mean MRT: high spatial abilities (HSA) (n = 12, 6F, MRT = 13.7 ± 3.0), and low spatial ability (LSA) groups (n = 10, 7F, MRT = 5.6 ± 2.0). Video recordings gaze and hand behaviors were compared between HSA and LSA groups across HAT conditions. The HSA group spent less time fixating on mirrored objects, an erroneous answer option, of HAT compared to the LSA group (11.0 ± 4.7 vs. 17.8 ± 7.3 s, p = 0.020) in S conditions. In haptic conditions, HSA utilized a hand–object interaction strategy characterized as palpation, significantly less than the LSA group (23.2 ± 16.0 vs. 43.1 ± 21.5 percent, p = 0.022). Before this study, it was unclear whether haptic sensory inputs appended to the mental schema models of the CTML. These data suggest that if spatial abilities are challenged, LSA persons both benefit and utilize strategies beyond the classic CTML framework by using their hands as a third input channel. This data suggest haptic behaviors offer a third type of sensory memory resulting in improved cognitive performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
触觉能力测试过程中的目光和手部行为--多媒体学习理论的最新进展。
多媒体学习认知理论(CTML)认为,人类通过视觉和听觉感官渠道进行学习。触觉是 CTML 的第三个渠道,也是体验式学习所缺少的组成部分。我们的目标是测量空间任务中的视觉和触觉行为。触觉能力测试(HAT)可量化准确性、时间和策略等几个方面的结果。触觉能力测试在三种感官条件下完成:视觉(S)、触觉(H)和视觉加触觉(SH)。受试者(n = 22,13 名女性(F),20-28 岁)完成了 MRT(10.6 ± 5.0,平均 ± SD),并根据平均 MRT 分为高空间能力组和低空间能力组:高空间能力组(HSA)(n = 12,6 名女性,MRT = 13.7 ± 3.0)和低空间能力组(LSA)(n = 10,7 名女性,MRT = 5.6 ± 2.0)。通过视频记录,比较了 HSA 组和 LSA 组在不同 HAT 条件下的注视和手部行为。与 LSA 组相比,在 S 条件下,HSA 组在 HAT 的错误答案选项镜像物体上花费的固定时间较少(11.0 ± 4.7 秒 vs. 17.8 ± 7.3 秒,p = 0.020)。在触觉条件下,HSA 使用以触觉为特征的手-物互动策略,明显少于 LSA 组(23.2 ± 16.0 vs. 43.1 ± 21.5%,p = 0.022)。在这项研究之前,人们还不清楚触觉输入是否会附加到 CTML 的心理图式模型中。这些数据表明,如果空间能力受到挑战,LSA 患者既能从中获益,又能通过使用双手作为第三输入渠道,利用经典 CTML 框架之外的策略。这些数据表明,触觉行为提供了第三种感官记忆,从而提高了认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Legal and ethical considerations around the use of existing illustrations to generate new illustrations in the anatomical sciences. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 18, Issue 1, 2025 Cover Image Editorial Board and Table of Contents The history of anatomical engagement. 21st Annual Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Clinical Anatomists (ANZACA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1