Analysis of self-monitoring of blood glucose metrics in gestational diabetes mellitus and their association with infants born large for gestational age: A historical observational cohort study of 879 pregnancies.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14997
Nael Shaat, Omar Akel, Karl Kristensen, Anton Nilsson, Kerstin Berntorp, Anastasia Katsarou
{"title":"Analysis of self-monitoring of blood glucose metrics in gestational diabetes mellitus and their association with infants born large for gestational age: A historical observational cohort study of 879 pregnancies.","authors":"Nael Shaat, Omar Akel, Karl Kristensen, Anton Nilsson, Kerstin Berntorp, Anastasia Katsarou","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the standard of care for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to review SMBG profiles in women with GDM and to examine how glucose metrics derived from SMBG relate to fetal overgrowth and infants born large for gestational age (LGA, >90th percentile).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, historical, observational cohort study of 879 GDM pregnancies in Sweden. The diagnosis of GDM was based on a universal 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at gestational week 28 or 12 in high-risk women. The glucose metrics derived from the SMBG profiles were calculated. Treatment targets for glucose were <5.3 mmol/L fasting, and ≤7.8 mmol/L 1-h postprandial. The median (interquartile range) number of glucose measurements in the analysis for each woman was 318 (216-471), including 53 (38-79) fasting glucose measurements. Associations between glucose metrics and LGA were analyzed using binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, smoking, nulliparity, and European/non-European origin. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate glucose levels for LGA prediction. Differences in means were tested using analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of LGA infants was 14.6%. Higher mean glucose levels and smaller proportion of readings in target (glucose 3.5-7.8 mmol/L) were significantly associated with LGA (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.06 [2.05-4.57] and 0.94 [0.92-0.96], respectively). The strongest association was found with mean fasting glucose (3.84 [2.55-5.77]). The ability of mean fasting glucose and overall mean glucose to predict LGA infants in the ROC curves was fair, with areas under the curve of 0.738 and 0.697, respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding discriminating thresholds were 5.3 and 6.1 mmol/L, respectively. Mean glucose levels increased and readings in target decreased with increasing body mass index category and at each step of adding pharmacological treatment, from diet alone to metformin and insulin (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher mean glucose levels and a smaller proportion of readings within the target range were associated with an increased risk of LGA. Suboptimal glucose control is associated with obesity and the need for pharmacological treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the standard of care for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to review SMBG profiles in women with GDM and to examine how glucose metrics derived from SMBG relate to fetal overgrowth and infants born large for gestational age (LGA, >90th percentile).

Material and methods: This was a single-center, historical, observational cohort study of 879 GDM pregnancies in Sweden. The diagnosis of GDM was based on a universal 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at gestational week 28 or 12 in high-risk women. The glucose metrics derived from the SMBG profiles were calculated. Treatment targets for glucose were <5.3 mmol/L fasting, and ≤7.8 mmol/L 1-h postprandial. The median (interquartile range) number of glucose measurements in the analysis for each woman was 318 (216-471), including 53 (38-79) fasting glucose measurements. Associations between glucose metrics and LGA were analyzed using binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, smoking, nulliparity, and European/non-European origin. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate glucose levels for LGA prediction. Differences in means were tested using analysis of variance.

Results: The proportion of LGA infants was 14.6%. Higher mean glucose levels and smaller proportion of readings in target (glucose 3.5-7.8 mmol/L) were significantly associated with LGA (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.06 [2.05-4.57] and 0.94 [0.92-0.96], respectively). The strongest association was found with mean fasting glucose (3.84 [2.55-5.77]). The ability of mean fasting glucose and overall mean glucose to predict LGA infants in the ROC curves was fair, with areas under the curve of 0.738 and 0.697, respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding discriminating thresholds were 5.3 and 6.1 mmol/L, respectively. Mean glucose levels increased and readings in target decreased with increasing body mass index category and at each step of adding pharmacological treatment, from diet alone to metformin and insulin (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Higher mean glucose levels and a smaller proportion of readings within the target range were associated with an increased risk of LGA. Suboptimal glucose control is associated with obesity and the need for pharmacological treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期糖尿病患者自我监测血糖指标的分析及其与胎龄偏大婴儿的关系:对 879 例妊娠的历史观察队列研究。
导言:自我血糖监测(SMBG)是妊娠糖尿病(GDM)妇女的标准护理方法。本研究旨在回顾 GDM 妇女的 SMBG 情况,并探讨 SMBG 得出的血糖指标与胎儿过度生长和胎龄儿巨大儿(LGA,大于第 90 百分位数)之间的关系:这是一项针对瑞典 879 例 GDM 孕妇的单中心、历史性、观察性队列研究。GDM 的诊断依据是在妊娠第 28 周或第 12 周对高危孕妇进行的通用 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验。根据 SMBG 图谱计算出血糖指标。结果:LGA 婴儿的比例为 14.6%。较高的平均血糖水平和较小的目标读数比例(血糖 3.5-7.8 mmol/L)与 LGA 有显著相关性(几率比 [95% 置信区间]:3.06 [2.05-4.8 mmol/L]):分别为 3.06 [2.05-4.57] 和 0.94 [0.92-0.96])。平均空腹血糖的相关性最强(3.84 [2.55-5.77] )。在 ROC 曲线中,平均空腹血糖和总平均血糖预测 LGA 婴儿的能力尚可,曲线下面积分别为 0.738 和 0.697(p 结论:平均血糖水平越高,预测 LGA 婴儿的能力越强:平均血糖水平越高、读数在目标范围内的比例越小,患 LGA 的风险就越高。血糖控制不理想与肥胖和需要药物治疗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Decreased expression of Syndecan- 1 (CD138) in the endometrium of adenomyosis patients suggests a potential pathogenetic role. Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound in a sub-Saharan population: A longitudinal cohort study. The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival. Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1