Assessment of diagnostic performance and complication rate in percutaneous lung biopsy based on target nodule size

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04648-3
Andrew W. Bowman, Zhuo Li
{"title":"Assessment of diagnostic performance and complication rate in percutaneous lung biopsy based on target nodule size","authors":"Andrew W. Bowman,&nbsp;Zhuo Li","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04648-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>\n Percutaneous lung biopsies are a common radiologic procedure, although they are not without risk. As imaging techniques continue to increase in sophistication, referring providers may request lung biopsies on smaller and smaller targets. Our purpose is to better understand when we should expect lung biopsies to yield diagnostic results of lung nodules of varying sizes and how size impacts the complication rate of the procedure.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>\n We retrospectively reviewed all outpatient lung biopsies performed at our institution between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020. For all procedures, target nodule size, location, diagnostic performance, and complication rates were recorded.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>\n We found that diagnostic yield increased with increasing nodule size, with ROC analysis indicating that the best threshold size to predict a diagnostic sample is 1.4 cm. Pneumothorax rate significantly increased with decreasing target size, but there was no significant association between target size and the need for either chest tube placement or hospital admission.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>\n The smaller a lung nodule is, the harder it is to obtain a diagnostic sample, and the more likely it is to develop a post-biopsy pneumothorax. However, smaller target size is not associated with an increased risk of chest tube placement or hospital admission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 5","pages":"2286 - 2293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04648-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous lung biopsies are a common radiologic procedure, although they are not without risk. As imaging techniques continue to increase in sophistication, referring providers may request lung biopsies on smaller and smaller targets. Our purpose is to better understand when we should expect lung biopsies to yield diagnostic results of lung nodules of varying sizes and how size impacts the complication rate of the procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all outpatient lung biopsies performed at our institution between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020. For all procedures, target nodule size, location, diagnostic performance, and complication rates were recorded.

Results

We found that diagnostic yield increased with increasing nodule size, with ROC analysis indicating that the best threshold size to predict a diagnostic sample is 1.4 cm. Pneumothorax rate significantly increased with decreasing target size, but there was no significant association between target size and the need for either chest tube placement or hospital admission.

Conclusion

The smaller a lung nodule is, the harder it is to obtain a diagnostic sample, and the more likely it is to develop a post-biopsy pneumothorax. However, smaller target size is not associated with an increased risk of chest tube placement or hospital admission.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据目标结节大小评估经皮肺活检的诊断性能和并发症发生率
目的:经皮肺活检是一种常见的放射学检查,尽管它并非没有风险。随着成像技术的不断提高,转诊医生可能会要求在越来越小的目标上进行肺活检。我们的目的是为了更好地了解我们何时应该期望肺活检产生不同大小的肺结节的诊断结果,以及大小如何影响手术的并发症发生率。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月1日至2020年6月30日期间在我院进行的所有门诊肺活检。所有手术均记录目标结节大小、位置、诊断表现和并发症发生率。结果:我们发现诊断率随着结节大小的增加而增加,ROC分析表明预测诊断样本的最佳阈值大小为1.4 cm。气胸发生率随着靶尺寸的减小而显著增加,但靶尺寸与胸管置放或住院之间没有显著相关性。结论:肺结节越小,越难获得诊断样本,活检后发生气胸的可能性越大。然而,较小的靶尺寸与胸管置入或住院的风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 Correction to: Pictorial review of multiparametric MRI in bladder urothelial carcinoma with variant histology: pearls and pitfalls. Correction to: A case of immunoglobulin G4-related disease with a urethral lesion diagnosed by radiological imaging before biopsy. Correction to: Impact of anatomical features of non-thrombotic left iliac venous compression on the development of venous leg ulcers based on CT venography. Imaging of esophageal perforation including in the postoperative patient: a contemporary review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1