Combining CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major imaging features: diagnostic accuracy for classification of indeterminate liver observations in patients at risk for HCC.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04625-w
Tania Siu Xiao, Cristina Mariuxi Kuon Yeng Escalante, Aylin Tahmasebi, Yuko Kono, Fabio Piscaglia, Stephanie R Wilson, Alexandra Medellin-Kowalewski, Shuchi K Rodgers, Virginia Planz, Aya Kamaya, David T Fetzer, Annalisa Berzigotti, Iuliana-Pompilia Radu, Paul S Sidhu, Corinne E Wessner, Kristen Bradigan, John R Eisenbrey, Flemming Forsberg, Andrej Lyshchik
{"title":"Combining CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major imaging features: diagnostic accuracy for classification of indeterminate liver observations in patients at risk for HCC.","authors":"Tania Siu Xiao, Cristina Mariuxi Kuon Yeng Escalante, Aylin Tahmasebi, Yuko Kono, Fabio Piscaglia, Stephanie R Wilson, Alexandra Medellin-Kowalewski, Shuchi K Rodgers, Virginia Planz, Aya Kamaya, David T Fetzer, Annalisa Berzigotti, Iuliana-Pompilia Radu, Paul S Sidhu, Corinne E Wessner, Kristen Bradigan, John R Eisenbrey, Flemming Forsberg, Andrej Lyshchik","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04625-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of combining CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major imaging features for the improved categorization of liver observations indeterminate on both CT/MRI and CEUS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis using a database from a prospective study conducted at 11 centers in North America and Europe from 2018 to 2022 included a total of 109 participants at risk for HCC who had liver observations with indeterminate characterization (LR3, LR-4, and LR-M) on both CEUS and CT/MRI. The individual CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major features were extracted from the original study and analyzed in various combinations. Reference standards included biopsy, explant histology, and follow-up CT/MRI. The diagnostic performance of the combinations of LI-RADS major features for definitive diagnosis of HCC was calculated. A reverse, stepwise logistical regression sub-analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 114 observations indeterminate on both CT/MRI and CEUS. These observations were categorized as LR-3 (n = 37), LR-4 (n = 41), and LR-M (n = 36) on CT/MRI and LR-3 (n = 48), LR-4 (n = 36), LR-M (n = 29), and LR-TIV (n = 1) on CEUS. Of them, 43.0% (49/114) were confirmed as HCC, 37.3% (43/114) non-malignant, and 19.3% (22/114) non-hepatocellular malignancies. The highest diagnostic accuracy among the combinations of imaging features was achieved in CT/MRI LR-3 observations, where the combination of CEUS arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) + CT/MRI APHE had 96.7% specificity, 75.0% positive predictive value (PPV), and 86.5% accuracy for HCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of LI-RADS major features on CT/MRI and CEUS showed higher specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to individual modalities' assessments, particularly for CT/MRI LR-3 observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04625-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of combining CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major imaging features for the improved categorization of liver observations indeterminate on both CT/MRI and CEUS.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis using a database from a prospective study conducted at 11 centers in North America and Europe from 2018 to 2022 included a total of 109 participants at risk for HCC who had liver observations with indeterminate characterization (LR3, LR-4, and LR-M) on both CEUS and CT/MRI. The individual CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS major features were extracted from the original study and analyzed in various combinations. Reference standards included biopsy, explant histology, and follow-up CT/MRI. The diagnostic performance of the combinations of LI-RADS major features for definitive diagnosis of HCC was calculated. A reverse, stepwise logistical regression sub-analysis was also performed.

Results: This study included 114 observations indeterminate on both CT/MRI and CEUS. These observations were categorized as LR-3 (n = 37), LR-4 (n = 41), and LR-M (n = 36) on CT/MRI and LR-3 (n = 48), LR-4 (n = 36), LR-M (n = 29), and LR-TIV (n = 1) on CEUS. Of them, 43.0% (49/114) were confirmed as HCC, 37.3% (43/114) non-malignant, and 19.3% (22/114) non-hepatocellular malignancies. The highest diagnostic accuracy among the combinations of imaging features was achieved in CT/MRI LR-3 observations, where the combination of CEUS arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) + CT/MRI APHE had 96.7% specificity, 75.0% positive predictive value (PPV), and 86.5% accuracy for HCC.

Conclusion: The combination of LI-RADS major features on CT/MRI and CEUS showed higher specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to individual modalities' assessments, particularly for CT/MRI LR-3 observations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合 CEUS 和 CT/MRI LI-RADS 主要成像特征:对有 HCC 风险的患者进行不确定肝脏观察分类的诊断准确性。
目的:确定结合CEUS和CT/MRI LI-RADS主要成像特征对CT/MRI和CEUS均不确定的肝脏观察结果进行改进分类的诊断准确性:利用2018年至2022年在北美和欧洲11个中心开展的一项前瞻性研究的数据库进行回顾性分析,共纳入109名HCC风险参与者,他们的肝脏观察结果在CEUS和CT/MRI上均为不确定特征(LR3、LR-4和LR-M)。CEUS和CT/MRI LI-RADS的各个主要特征均从原始研究中提取,并以不同的组合进行分析。参考标准包括活组织检查、病理组织学检查和随访 CT/MRI。计算了LI-RADS主要特征组合对明确诊断HCC的诊断性能。同时还进行了反向逐步统计回归子分析:本研究纳入了 114 例 CT/MRI 和 CEUS 均无法确定诊断的病例。这些观察结果在 CT/MRI 上被分为 LR-3(n = 37)、LR-4(n = 41)和 LR-M(n = 36),在 CEUS 上被分为 LR-3(n = 48)、LR-4(n = 36)、LR-M(n = 29)和 LR-TIV (n = 1)。其中,43.0%(49/114)被确诊为 HCC,37.3%(43/114)为非恶性肿瘤,19.3%(22/114)为非肝细胞恶性肿瘤。在CT/MRI LR-3观察结果中,CEUS动脉期高增强(APHE)+CT/MRI APHE的组合对HCC的特异性为96.7%,阳性预测值(PPV)为75.0%,准确率为86.5%:结论:CT/MRI和CEUS的LI-RADS主要特征组合与单个模式的评估相比,显示出更高的特异性、PPV和准确性,尤其是CT/MRI LR-3观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Renovascular hypertension - a primer for the radiologist. Assessment of high-risk gastroesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients using quantitative parameters from dual-source dual-energy CT. Dynamic changes of radiological and radiomics patterns based on MRI in viable hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization. Enhancing bone metastasis prediction in prostate cancer using quantitative mpMRI features, ISUP grade and PSA density: a machine learning approach. Exam quality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI and impact on early-stage HCC detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1