Associations between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and second-pregnancy preterm delivery.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14996
Anders Einum, Quaker E Harmon, Linn Marie Sørbye, Roy Miodini Nilsen, Nils-Halvdan Morken
{"title":"Associations between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and second-pregnancy preterm delivery.","authors":"Anders Einum, Quaker E Harmon, Linn Marie Sørbye, Roy Miodini Nilsen, Nils-Halvdan Morken","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cesarean delivery has been shown to increase the risk of preterm delivery in future pregnancies. The association could be a direct result of the procedure, or because the indications that led to the cesarean delivery also increase the risk of preterm delivery in later pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>298 901 mothers with first and second singleton deliveries from 1999 to 2020 were investigated using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway linked with Statistics Norway. The mothers were categorized by mode of cesarean delivery (total, emergency and planned) and vaginal delivery at term in the first pregnancy. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm delivery <37 gestational weeks in the second pregnancy. Second, we explored the role of recurrent placental disease in preterm delivery by comparing estimates in mothers with placental disease in neither or both pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8243 mothers (2.8%) had a preterm delivery in the second pregnancy. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of preterm delivery was 1.24 (95% CI 1.17-1.32) after cesarean compared with vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. The association was stronger in previous planned compared with emergency cesarean delivery (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.77 and aRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.29, respectively). Spontaneous preterm delivery was not associated with the previous mode of delivery; the risk was confined to iatrogenic preterm delivery after both emergency and planned cesarean delivery (aRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.52-1.87 and aRR 2.65, 95% CI 2.12-3.30, respectively). Mothers with placental disease in both pregnancies had a sixfold increased risk of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy compared with mothers with no placental disease, however, the association between mode of delivery and subsequent preterm delivery was similar in mothers with and without placental disease in the pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with vaginal term delivery in the first pregnancy, cesarean delivery increases the risk of iatrogenic, but not spontaneous preterm delivery in the next pregnancy. Although strongly associated with preterm delivery, placental disease had limited influence on the estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean delivery has been shown to increase the risk of preterm delivery in future pregnancies. The association could be a direct result of the procedure, or because the indications that led to the cesarean delivery also increase the risk of preterm delivery in later pregnancies.

Material and methods: 298 901 mothers with first and second singleton deliveries from 1999 to 2020 were investigated using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway linked with Statistics Norway. The mothers were categorized by mode of cesarean delivery (total, emergency and planned) and vaginal delivery at term in the first pregnancy. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm delivery <37 gestational weeks in the second pregnancy. Second, we explored the role of recurrent placental disease in preterm delivery by comparing estimates in mothers with placental disease in neither or both pregnancies.

Results: 8243 mothers (2.8%) had a preterm delivery in the second pregnancy. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of preterm delivery was 1.24 (95% CI 1.17-1.32) after cesarean compared with vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. The association was stronger in previous planned compared with emergency cesarean delivery (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.77 and aRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.29, respectively). Spontaneous preterm delivery was not associated with the previous mode of delivery; the risk was confined to iatrogenic preterm delivery after both emergency and planned cesarean delivery (aRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.52-1.87 and aRR 2.65, 95% CI 2.12-3.30, respectively). Mothers with placental disease in both pregnancies had a sixfold increased risk of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy compared with mothers with no placental disease, however, the association between mode of delivery and subsequent preterm delivery was similar in mothers with and without placental disease in the pregnancies.

Conclusions: Compared with vaginal term delivery in the first pregnancy, cesarean delivery increases the risk of iatrogenic, but not spontaneous preterm delivery in the next pregnancy. Although strongly associated with preterm delivery, placental disease had limited influence on the estimates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头胎剖宫产与二胎早产之间的关系。
导言事实证明,剖宫产会增加未来妊娠中早产的风险。这种关联可能是手术的直接结果,也可能是因为导致剖宫产的适应症也会增加以后怀孕的早产风险。材料和方法:研究人员利用与挪威统计局联网的挪威出生医学登记处的数据,对1999年至2020年期间298 901名第一胎和第二胎单胎分娩的母亲进行了调查。这些母亲按剖宫产方式(完全剖宫产、紧急剖宫产和计划剖宫产)和首次妊娠足月阴道分娩方式进行分类。我们使用对数二项式回归模型来估算先天性早产和自然早产的相对风险及 95% 的置信区间(CI):8243 名母亲(2.8%)在第二次怀孕时发生早产。与第一次妊娠经阴道分娩相比,剖宫产后早产的调整相对风险(aRR)为 1.24(95% CI 1.17-1.32)。与紧急剖宫产相比,计划剖宫产与早产的关系更为密切(aRR 分别为 1.52,95% CI 1.30-1.77 和 aRR 1.21,95% CI 1.14-1.29)。自然早产与之前的分娩方式无关;其风险仅限于急诊和计划剖宫产后的先天性早产(aRR 分别为 1.69,95% CI 1.52-1.87 和 aRR 2.65,95% CI 2.12-3.30)。与没有胎盘疾病的母亲相比,两次妊娠均有胎盘疾病的母亲在第二次妊娠时发生早产的风险增加了六倍,但是,两次妊娠均有胎盘疾病的母亲和没有胎盘疾病的母亲的分娩方式与随后的早产之间的关系相似:结论:与第一次妊娠经阴道足月分娩相比,剖宫产会增加下一次妊娠发生先天性早产的风险,但不会增加自发性早产的风险。胎盘疾病虽然与早产密切相关,但对估计值的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Decreased expression of Syndecan- 1 (CD138) in the endometrium of adenomyosis patients suggests a potential pathogenetic role. Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound in a sub-Saharan population: A longitudinal cohort study. The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival. Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1