Experiences of pain communication in endometriosis: A meta-synthesis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14995
Nastasja Robstad, Anita Paulsen, Ingvild Vistad, Alexandra Christine Hott, Kari Hansen Berg, Anita Øgård-Repål, Jannicke Rabben, Eirunn Wallevik Kristoffersen, Gudrun Rohde
{"title":"Experiences of pain communication in endometriosis: A meta-synthesis.","authors":"Nastasja Robstad, Anita Paulsen, Ingvild Vistad, Alexandra Christine Hott, Kari Hansen Berg, Anita Øgård-Repål, Jannicke Rabben, Eirunn Wallevik Kristoffersen, Gudrun Rohde","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometriosis is the leading cause of chronic pelvic pain among women. The pain associated with endometriosis significantly impacts various aspects of patients' quality of life. A notable void in the literature is the absence of a systematic review exploring pain communication between patients with endometriosis and healthcare professionals. Hence, the aim of this qualitative systematic review was to synthesize findings on how patients with endometriosis experience communicating with healthcare professionals about pain and how healthcare professionals experience these interactions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted related to patients with endometriosis and pain communication in CINAHL PLUS with full text and MEDLINE (via EBSCO host) on May 12, 2023, and updated January 26, 2024. Searches were supplemented by backward searching reference lists and forward searching citations of included reports in Scopus and Google Scholar. The review was guided by the four-step meta-synthesis methodology by Sandelowski and Barosso. Critical appraisal of included studies was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CASP). Findings were analyzed thematically, using the approach described by Thomas and Harden. The meta-synthesis was based on a registered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD 42023425430), and the study is reported adhering to the PRISMA 2020 checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 37 reports published from 2003 until 2023 contributed to the review, including 4842 participants. Through thematic analysis, we developed the following themes: \"Navigating the double burden,\" \"Lack of mutual understanding,\" and \"The complexities of conveying pain.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The communication of pain between patients with endometriosis and healthcare professionals is complex, encompassing patterns of disbelief, normalization, and psychological attribution. Engaging in discussions about pain presents diverse challenges stemming from insufficient communication skills and assessment tools. Further research is warranted to comprehensively explore the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals, aiming to devise strategies that enhance communication and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endometriosis is the leading cause of chronic pelvic pain among women. The pain associated with endometriosis significantly impacts various aspects of patients' quality of life. A notable void in the literature is the absence of a systematic review exploring pain communication between patients with endometriosis and healthcare professionals. Hence, the aim of this qualitative systematic review was to synthesize findings on how patients with endometriosis experience communicating with healthcare professionals about pain and how healthcare professionals experience these interactions.

Material and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted related to patients with endometriosis and pain communication in CINAHL PLUS with full text and MEDLINE (via EBSCO host) on May 12, 2023, and updated January 26, 2024. Searches were supplemented by backward searching reference lists and forward searching citations of included reports in Scopus and Google Scholar. The review was guided by the four-step meta-synthesis methodology by Sandelowski and Barosso. Critical appraisal of included studies was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CASP). Findings were analyzed thematically, using the approach described by Thomas and Harden. The meta-synthesis was based on a registered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD 42023425430), and the study is reported adhering to the PRISMA 2020 checklist.

Results: Overall, 37 reports published from 2003 until 2023 contributed to the review, including 4842 participants. Through thematic analysis, we developed the following themes: "Navigating the double burden," "Lack of mutual understanding," and "The complexities of conveying pain."

Conclusions: The communication of pain between patients with endometriosis and healthcare professionals is complex, encompassing patterns of disbelief, normalization, and psychological attribution. Engaging in discussions about pain presents diverse challenges stemming from insufficient communication skills and assessment tools. Further research is warranted to comprehensively explore the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals, aiming to devise strategies that enhance communication and patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症患者的疼痛沟通体验:元综合。
简介子宫内膜异位症是导致妇女慢性盆腔疼痛的主要原因。与子宫内膜异位症相关的疼痛严重影响了患者各方面的生活质量。文献中一个明显的空白是没有系统性综述探讨子宫内膜异位症患者与医护人员之间的疼痛沟通。因此,本定性系统综述旨在总结子宫内膜异位症患者如何与医护人员就疼痛问题进行沟通,以及医护人员如何体验这些互动的研究结果:2023年5月12日,在CINAHL PLUS全文和MEDLINE(通过EBSCO主机)中进行了有关子宫内膜异位症患者和疼痛交流的系统性文献检索,并于2024年1月26日进行了更新。此外,还在 Scopus 和 Google Scholar 中对纳入报告的参考文献列表进行了反向检索,并对引文进行了正向检索。综述以 Sandelowski 和 Barosso 的四步元综合法为指导。采用批判性评估技能程序(CASP)对纳入的研究进行批判性评估。采用托马斯和哈登描述的方法对研究结果进行了专题分析。荟萃综合以 PROSPERO(CRD 42023425430)中的注册方案为基础,研究报告遵循 PRISMA 2020 核对表:从 2003 年到 2023 年共发表了 37 篇报告,其中包括 4842 名参与者。通过主题分析,我们提出了以下主题:"双重负担"、"缺乏相互理解 "和 "传递疼痛的复杂性":子宫内膜异位症患者与医护人员之间的疼痛交流是复杂的,包括不相信、正常化和心理归因等模式。由于沟通技巧和评估工具的不足,参与有关疼痛的讨论面临着各种挑战。有必要开展进一步的研究,以全面探讨患者和医护人员的观点,从而制定出加强沟通和患者护理的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1