Pelvic floor-related sexual functioning in the first 24 months postpartum: Findings of a large cross-sectional study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14990
Carsten Hagenbeck, Jan Kössendrup, Johannes Soff, Fabinshy Thangarajah, Nadine Scholten
{"title":"Pelvic floor-related sexual functioning in the first 24 months postpartum: Findings of a large cross-sectional study.","authors":"Carsten Hagenbeck, Jan Kössendrup, Johannes Soff, Fabinshy Thangarajah, Nadine Scholten","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pelvic floor is exposed to differing stresses and trauma depending on the mode of birth. At the same time, the pelvic floor plays a crucial role in female sexual functioning (FSF). Whereby FSF encompasses different dimensions, from subjective satisfaction to physiological aspects, such as lack of pain and orgasm ability. The aim of the study presented here is to assess FSF in relationship to postpartum pelvic floor disorder based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR), in a large convenience sample and to identify whether there is an association between mode of birth as well as perineal injuries and FSF of women up to 24 months postpartum.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and recruited via social media women up to 24 months after birth of their last child. FSF was surveyed using the PISQ-IR. Details were also collected on all previous births and birth-related perineal trauma, as well as current breastfeeding, obesity, and socio-demographics. Multivariate models were then calculated to determine a possible association between FSF and birth mode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data basis is the responses of 2106 survey participants within the first 24 months postpartum. Even 12-24 months postpartum, 21% of respondents are not sexually active, which burdens almost 44% of these women. With regard to mode of delivery, differences in FSF are only evident in individual dimensions of the PISQ-IR. The dimensions \"Condition Impact\" and \"Condition Specific\" were significantly associated with more impairments in sexually active respondents up to 12 months postpartum whose last mode of delivery was forceps or vacuum extraction. If a perineal tear had occurred during last birth, this was significantly associated with a lower PISQ-IR subscore in the \"Condition Impact,\" \"Condition-Specific,\" \"Global Quality,\" \"Partner-Related,\" and \"Arousal\" models. The low variance explanation shows that further relevant factors on female sexuality may exist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The issue of impairments in FSF following childbirth, persisting for an extended period of time, is a significant postpartum concern. Due to the very different dimensions of FSF, the influence of the mode of delivery must be considered in a differentiated way.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The pelvic floor is exposed to differing stresses and trauma depending on the mode of birth. At the same time, the pelvic floor plays a crucial role in female sexual functioning (FSF). Whereby FSF encompasses different dimensions, from subjective satisfaction to physiological aspects, such as lack of pain and orgasm ability. The aim of the study presented here is to assess FSF in relationship to postpartum pelvic floor disorder based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR), in a large convenience sample and to identify whether there is an association between mode of birth as well as perineal injuries and FSF of women up to 24 months postpartum.

Material and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and recruited via social media women up to 24 months after birth of their last child. FSF was surveyed using the PISQ-IR. Details were also collected on all previous births and birth-related perineal trauma, as well as current breastfeeding, obesity, and socio-demographics. Multivariate models were then calculated to determine a possible association between FSF and birth mode.

Results: The data basis is the responses of 2106 survey participants within the first 24 months postpartum. Even 12-24 months postpartum, 21% of respondents are not sexually active, which burdens almost 44% of these women. With regard to mode of delivery, differences in FSF are only evident in individual dimensions of the PISQ-IR. The dimensions "Condition Impact" and "Condition Specific" were significantly associated with more impairments in sexually active respondents up to 12 months postpartum whose last mode of delivery was forceps or vacuum extraction. If a perineal tear had occurred during last birth, this was significantly associated with a lower PISQ-IR subscore in the "Condition Impact," "Condition-Specific," "Global Quality," "Partner-Related," and "Arousal" models. The low variance explanation shows that further relevant factors on female sexuality may exist.

Conclusions: The issue of impairments in FSF following childbirth, persisting for an extended period of time, is a significant postpartum concern. Due to the very different dimensions of FSF, the influence of the mode of delivery must be considered in a differentiated way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后 24 个月内与盆底相关的性功能:一项大型横断面研究的结果。
简介盆底因分娩方式的不同而承受着不同的压力和创伤。与此同时,盆底在女性性功能(FSF)中扮演着至关重要的角色。女性性功能包括不同的方面,从主观满意度到生理方面,如无痛苦和性高潮能力。本研究的目的是根据盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷(PISQ-IR),在一个大型便利样本中评估产后盆底功能障碍与产后性功能障碍的关系,并确定分娩方式以及会阴损伤与产后 24 个月内女性的性功能障碍之间是否存在关联:我们进行了一项横断面在线调查,并通过社交媒体招募了产后 24 个月内的妇女。我们使用 PISQ-IR 对 FSF 进行了调查。此外,我们还收集了以往所有分娩和分娩相关会阴创伤的详细情况,以及目前的母乳喂养情况、肥胖情况和社会人口统计数据。然后计算多变量模型,以确定FSF与分娩方式之间可能存在的关联:数据基础是产后 24 个月内 2106 名调查参与者的回答。即使在产后 12-24 个月内,也有 21% 的受访者没有性生活,这给其中近 44% 的妇女造成了负担。关于分娩方式,FSF 的差异仅在 PISQ-IR 的个别维度上表现明显。在产后 12 个月内性生活活跃的受访者中,如果最后一次分娩方式是产钳助产或真空吸引,那么 "情况影响 "和 "具体情况 "这两个维度与更多损伤有明显关联。如果最后一次分娩时发生会阴撕裂,则在 "状况影响"、"特定状况"、"总体质量"、"伴侣相关 "和 "唤醒 "模型中,这与较低的 PISQ-IR 子分数明显相关。低方差解释表明,可能还存在其他与女性性行为相关的因素:产后性功能障碍持续时间较长,是产后关注的一个重要问题。由于性功能障碍的程度各不相同,因此必须区别考虑分娩方式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1