Clinical utility of EBV DNA testing of blood in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients: A single-center experience.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae143
Simran Gupta, Sarah E Turbett, Erik Klontz, Camille N Kotton
{"title":"Clinical utility of EBV DNA testing of blood in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients: A single-center experience.","authors":"Simran Gupta, Sarah E Turbett, Erik Klontz, Camille N Kotton","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes different clinical presentations in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons, and thus indications for testing vary between these populations. We reviewed our institution's EBV DNA testing across these populations to understand its clinical utility and appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive EBV nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) testing from November 2022 to 2023. We recorded demographics, indications for testing, EBV-related diagnosis, laboratory results, and whether testing influenced patient treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3560 EBV NAAT tests, 187 (5.3%) were positive, representing 124 unique adult patients (51 immunocompetent and 73 immunocompromised). Reactivation of EBV was the most common diagnosis in both populations, followed by acute EBV infection in the immunocompetent and non-posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder malignancies in the immunocompromised. In immunocompromised patients, positive tests led to treatment changes more frequently than in immunocompetent patients (27.4% vs 11.7%, P = .06). Testing affected clinical management in 0% to 2% of cases when sent for sepsis/shock and nonspecific viral syndromes compared to 37% to 49% of cases when sent for posttransplant and malignancy screening/monitoring.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EBV NAAT testing infrequently influenced clinical management in immunocompetent individuals but had a notable impact in immunocompromised patients, particularly those undergoing posttransplant or malignancy screening. This underscores the need for targeted testing to optimize resource utilization and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes different clinical presentations in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons, and thus indications for testing vary between these populations. We reviewed our institution's EBV DNA testing across these populations to understand its clinical utility and appropriateness.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive EBV nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) testing from November 2022 to 2023. We recorded demographics, indications for testing, EBV-related diagnosis, laboratory results, and whether testing influenced patient treatment.

Results: Of 3560 EBV NAAT tests, 187 (5.3%) were positive, representing 124 unique adult patients (51 immunocompetent and 73 immunocompromised). Reactivation of EBV was the most common diagnosis in both populations, followed by acute EBV infection in the immunocompetent and non-posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder malignancies in the immunocompromised. In immunocompromised patients, positive tests led to treatment changes more frequently than in immunocompetent patients (27.4% vs 11.7%, P = .06). Testing affected clinical management in 0% to 2% of cases when sent for sepsis/shock and nonspecific viral syndromes compared to 37% to 49% of cases when sent for posttransplant and malignancy screening/monitoring.

Discussion: EBV NAAT testing infrequently influenced clinical management in immunocompetent individuals but had a notable impact in immunocompromised patients, particularly those undergoing posttransplant or malignancy screening. This underscores the need for targeted testing to optimize resource utilization and cost-effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下患者血液中 EBV DNA 检测的临床实用性:单中心经验。
目的:Epstein-Barr 病毒(EBV)会导致免疫功能健全者和免疫功能低下者出现不同的临床表现,因此这些人群的检测适应症也各不相同。我们回顾了本机构在这些人群中进行的 EBV DNA 检测,以了解其临床实用性和适宜性:我们对 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年期间 EBV 核酸扩增(NAAT)检测呈阳性的成年患者进行了回顾性病历审查。我们记录了人口统计学特征、检测适应症、EBV 相关诊断、实验室结果以及检测是否影响患者治疗:在 3560 例 EBV NAAT 检测中,有 187 例(5.3%)呈阳性,代表 124 例成年患者(51 例免疫功能正常,73 例免疫功能低下)。在这两种人群中,EB病毒再激活是最常见的诊断,其次是免疫功能健全者的急性EB病毒感染和免疫功能低下者的非移植后淋巴增生性疾病恶性肿瘤。在免疫功能低下的患者中,检测结果呈阳性导致治疗方案改变的比例高于免疫功能正常的患者(27.4% vs 11.7%,P = .06)。因败血症/休克和非特异性病毒综合征而送检的病例中,0% 到 2% 的检测结果会影响临床治疗,而因移植后和恶性肿瘤筛查/监测而送检的病例中,37% 到 49% 的检测结果会影响临床治疗:EBV NAAT检测很少影响免疫功能正常者的临床治疗,但对免疫功能低下患者,尤其是接受移植后或恶性肿瘤筛查的患者有显著影响。这强调了有必要进行有针对性的检测,以优化资源利用率和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1