Comparison of tucidinostat with CHOP-like versus CHOP-like in first-line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a single-center real-world study.

Abstract

Tucidinostat has been approved by the Chinese FDA for relapsed/refractory Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL), but its efficacy in newly diagnosed PTCL has not been confirmed. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of tucidinostat combined with CHOP-like (C + CHT) versus CHOP-like alone (CHT) in newly diagnosed PTCL patients. Of the PTCL patients, 109 were newly diagnosed. Patients in the C + CHT group who achieved objective response received tucidinostat maintenance therapy. A total of 36 pairs (n = 72) were matched at a ratio of 1:1 using propensity scoring. The matching criteria included: whether the Prognostic index for the peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified subtype (PIT) was ≥ 2, the pathological subtype, age > 60 years, and gender (matching tolerance = 0.024). A significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (P = 0.016), 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.026), and 2-year survival rate (P = 0.017) was observed for the C + CHT group as compared to the CHT group. After propensity score matching (PSM), the C + CHT group as compared to the CHT group displayed significantly longer PFS (P = 0.035) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.029). For the C + CHT group in the per-protocol set, the effect values showed a significant benefit in terms of both PFS (P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.019). Common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events (AEs), had comparable incidence in each group; while common non-haematological AEs, including elevated AST and ALT were higher in the C + CHT group than in the CHT group. Our study suggests that the tucidinostat with CHOP-like regimen and sequential tucidinostat maintenance after objective remission provides a promising therapeutic approach for treating newly diagnosed PTCL patients.